The New York Analysis concludes its report on President Obama’s approach to terrorism
Henry Miller, writing in Forbes, noted: “ When Air Force Lt. Col. Robert “Buzz” Patterson describes President Clinton’s gross irresponsibility toward national security… in the fall of 1998, the watch officer in the White House Situation Room notified the president’s national security adviser, Sandy Berger, that they had located bin Laden and had “a two-hour window to strike.”…Berger picked up the phone…Amazingly, President Clinton was not available…Finally, the president accepted Berger’s call. There was discussion, there were pauses – and no decision. The president wanted to talk with his secretaries of Defense and State. He wanted to study the issue further. Berger was forced to wait. The clock was ticking. The president eventually called back. He was still indecisive. He wanted more discussion. Berger alternated between phone calls and watching the clock. The dithering continued until it was too late–and bin Laden lived to fight another day….That was not an isolated incident. On Sept. 13, 1996, while on the golf course…President Clinton had refused to take repeated urgent phone calls from Berger, who needed the president’s approval for air strikes on Iraq…He never got it. The protective cover of night lifted, and the mission was aborted.
The Results of President Obama’s policies have been disastrous
The results of President Obama’s approach have not been successful. In a Hearing before the House Homeland Security Committee in July, Nicholas J. Rasmussen Director National Counterterrorism Center testified:
“Unfortunately, the range of threats we face has become increasingly diverse and geographically expansive, as we saw with ISIL’s recent wave of attacks in Bangladesh, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey… In addition to the attacks overseas, we are no doubt reminded by the shooting in Orlando, Florida, last month that homegrown violent extremists, or HVEs, who are inspired by groups such as ISIL remain an unpredictable threat we face in the Homeland. …As we approach 15 years since 9/11, the array of terrorist actors around the globe is broader, wider, and deeper than it has been at any time since that day. ISIL’s narrative, rooted in unceasing warfare against all enemies, extends beyond the Syria-Iraq battlefield. ISIL has conducted attacks ranging in tactics and targets—the bombing of a Russian airliner in Egypt; the attacks in Paris at restaurants, a sports stadium, and a concert venue; the killing of hostages and Bangladeshi law enforcement officials in a café in Bangladesh; and the bombing of a crowded commercial district in Baghdad—all of which demonstrate how ISIL can capitalize on local affiliates on the ground for attacks.”
Erections viagra sales in canada are caused by excitement in brain, physical stimulation or both. Restoring the spine to its normal functioning position, a patient can enjoy: Renewed vitality and sense of well-being Increased ability to focus Improved immune viagra uk function Better sleep quality Greater range of motion And it’s achieved naturally, without the need for potentially addictive drugs. It is important to give time to a woman and sildenafil 100mg tab build up a strong relationship. Set the relationship goals- It may sound somewhat weird, but the setting viagra properien relationship goal is more important for both of you to schedule couple time with each other without the little ones around.
Former Vice President Dick Cheney writes in the World Street Journal:
“Winning this war will require an effort of greater scale and commitment than anything we have seen since World War II, calling on every element of our national power. Defeating our enemies has been made significantly more difficult by the policies of Barack Obama… the threat from global terrorist organizations has grown… Despite Mr. Obama’s claim that ISIS has been diminished, John Brennan,Mr. Obama’s CIA director, told the Senate Intelligence Committee in June that, “Our efforts have not reduced the group’s terrorism capability or global reach.”
The president’s policies have contributed to our enemies’ advance. In his first days in office, Mr. Obama moved to take the nation off a war footing and return to the failed policies of the 1990s when terrorism was treated as a law-enforcement matter… As he released terrorists to return to the field of battle, Mr. Obama was simultaneously withdrawing American forces from Iraq and Afghanistan. He calls this policy “ending wars.” Most reasonable people recognize this approach as losing wars… President Obama and Secretaries of State Hillary Clinton and John Kerry were so concerned with pleasing Iran’s ruling mullahs that they were willing to overlook the American blood on Iranian hands and decades of Iran’s activities as the world’s leading state sponsor of terror.”
The day before President Obama took the Oath of Office in his first term, Iraq was a nation slowly moving towards a stable democracy, despite the existence or numerous challenges. ISIS barely existed. There had been no serious successful assaults on U.S. assets for a significant period of time. Since his Administration began, notes Paul Sperry in the New York Post, “America has…averaged one serious Islamic terrorist attack a year …yet he still insists the threat from radical Islam is overblown and that he’s successfully protecting the nation.”