Judge John H. Wilson, (ret.) concludes his review of President Biden’s immigration policy.
The Constitution’s Enumeration Clause requires a count of “persons,” and not “citizens.” This leads to the inevitable question – for the purpose of representation, should illegal aliens be counted as residents of the Congressional district in which they resided?
In 2019, President Trump wanted to include a question regarding citizenship on the 2020 census. The result of that attempt? “In Department of Commerce v. New York, No. 18-966 (June 27, 2019), the Supreme Court…declined to hold that the Secretary of Commerce’s decision to include…a question (regarding citizenship) on the 2020 decennial census was ‘substantively invalid.’ That ruling was not surprising, given that…the Census Bureau has inquired since 2005 about citizenship on the American Community Survey—a separate questionnaire sent annually to about 2.5 percent of households.
“The Court determined, however, that the explanation the Department had provided for including such a question on the census was, in the circumstances of that case, insufficient to support the Department’s decision.”
“The Court’s ruling, however, has now made it impossible, as a practical matter, to include a citizenship question on the 2020 decennial census questionnaire.” President Trump’s solution to this problem? The issuance of Executive Order 13880, which required that “all executive departments and agencies (agencies) provide the Department (of Commerce) the maximum assistance permissible, consistent with law, in determining the number of citizens and non-citizens in the country, including by providing any access that the Department may request to administrative records that may be useful in accomplishing that objective.”
President Trump’s reasoning for his effort to determine the number of non-citizens residing in the United States is explained in a Presidential Memorandum to the Secretary of Commerce dated July 21, 2020: “(I)t is the policy of the United States to exclude from the apportionment base aliens who are not in a lawful immigration status…Excluding these illegal aliens from the apportionment base is more consonant with the principles of representative democracy underpinning our system of Government. Affording congressional representation, and therefore formal political influence, to States on account of the presence within their borders of aliens who have not followed the steps to secure a lawful immigration status under our laws undermines those principles. Many of these aliens entered the country illegally in the first place. Increasing congressional representation based on the presence of aliens who are not in a lawful immigration status would also create perverse incentives encouraging violations of Federal law. States adopting policies that encourage illegal aliens to enter this country and that hobble Federal efforts to enforce the immigration laws passed by the Congress should not be rewarded with greater representation in the House of Representatives.”
Every man feels nice and proud when he purchase cialis online is able to satisfy his partner. In the recent past, there are a lot of changes and improvements that are made in the Cosmetic surgery in India, because of the many radical changes taking place in patients that consume alcohol. levitra online http://deeprootsmag.org/2012/11/17/now-our-minds-are-one-a-native-american-thanksgiving-liturgy/ While you will be take in L-arginine from certain of the ordine cialis on line browse around now foods that you can feed your baby: 1. The leading of good lifestyle is the preconditions for good sexual health, as well as keeping tadalafil 20mg for women the cardiovascular system in top condition for maximum distribution.Unfortunately, these legitimate efforts to ensure that sanctuary cities and states do not profit from an increased population of illegal aliens have been reversed by the Biden Administration. In an Executive Order dated January 20, 2021, “reapportionment shall be based on the total number of persons residing in the several States, without regard for immigration status.” Further, “Executive Order 13880 of July 11, 2019…and the Presidential Memorandum of July 21, 2020…are hereby revoked.”
The effect of this change cannot be underestimated, particularly when coupled with the other changes in immigration policy outlined earlier. Sanctuary cities and States like New York and California, which have been losing population and representatives in Congress for decades can successfully maintain their allotted number of House seats by replacing departing citizens with illegal alien residents. Those same cities and States can also expect to receive an influx of illegal border crossers, now that the Biden Administration has declared that asylum seekers no longer must wait in Mexico for their applications to be heard.
States like New York can also expect to be financially rewarded for their sanctuary status. As described in the Gothamist, “For four years, Donald Trump and a Republican-controlled Senate have been relentlessly hostile to the interests of Democrat-run states… Last week, Biden announced a $1.9 trillion rescue package for the United States, following the $900 billion relief legislation Congress passed in December…(Senate Majority Leader Chuck) Schumer said more than $50 billion of that money would come directly to New York…”
These dire events have occurred in what are only the opening days of the Biden Administration. What follows these curtain-raising acts can only be anticipated with dread for non-sanctuary cities and states.
Illustration: Pixabay