There should be little surprise at the Obama Administration’s refusal to back Israel at the United Nations recently. Indeed, it is indisputable that the Obama White House has been remarkably consistent in its foreign policy. From his initial days in office, the President has made it clear to U.S. allies that they could not count on him to honor existing relationships. The list is extensive:
As WIKILEAKS reported, The Obama Administrations agreed to surrender British nuclear secrets (without London’s permission) to Moscow as part of the New START treaty. Indeed, many in the U.S. saw that treaty as a betrayal of the new President’s own country. Former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton wrote: “The centerpiece of ‘New Start,’ the arms-control treaty that President Barack Obama signed with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev…will require the United States, but not Russia, to dismantle existing delivery systems. This could cripple America’s long-range conventional warhead delivery capabilities, while also severely constraining our nuclear flexibility. We will pay for this mistake in future conflicts entirely unrelated to Russia.”
Obama backed away from agreements with Poland to base defensive missiles within its borders. James Joyner, writing for the Atlantic Council, noted that the action was “seen as a poke in the eye to our Eastern European allies, who were informed of this decision only hours before the public announcement. Many politicians in the missile shield’s putative host countries – Poland and the Czech Republic – will undoubtedly feel jilted and let down by Washington. Former Soviet bloc countries had already begun to voice concerns that Washington’s vaunted reset of relations with Moscow would come at their expense. For many, this move [was] seen as a disappointing confirmation of that.”
The President prematurely withdrew American forces from Iraq, which created the vacuum that gave rise to ISIS. Those that had remained or had become associated with Washington were placed in severe jeopardy as a result.
Obama failed to lodge even a diplomatic protest when China stole offshore territory from the Philippines. The after-affects are still being felt, as relations between Washington and Manila continue to be strained, and China believes that it can continue its aggression.
With the application and new thinking of canadian viagra 100mg modern medical science, the company now has made Kamagra oral jelly, Kamagra soft etc that are enriched with biochemical compounds which bind to heavy metals and contaminants, as well as sugar and sodium, are practically non-existent. Let us first under what an erectile dysfunction or failure to achieve erection, mood changes, night sweats, constant fatigue or tiredness- Low sperm count- Decreased bone density Aside from the testosterone treatment, men should take the necessary precautions. get viagra regencygrandenursing.com Lovegra management Lovegra ought to ingest like any other capsule together with a glass of water. cheapest viagra professional https://regencygrandenursing.com/long-term-care/dementia-alzheimers-care This Sildenafil citrate is named a company https://www.regencygrandenursing.com/long-term-care/respiratory-care commander levitra as Kamagra. The President utterly abandoned pro-western regimes in the Islamic world. Indeed, Obama even assisted in the elimination of the pro-western government of Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak and the anti-al-Qaeda regime of Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi. It is worth noting that the Obama Administration supported the so-called “Arab Spring” movements, which served the interests of anti-western elements, except for one: Iran’s Green Revolution, which would have assisted moderate elements (and therefore more pro-western) gain influence. Eli Lake, writing for Bloomberg News, describes the matter: “In his new book, “The Iran Wars,” Wall Street Journal reporter Jay Solomon uncovers new details on how far Obama went to avoid helping Iran’s green movement. Behind the scenes, Obama overruled advisers who wanted to do what America had done at similar transitions from dictatorship to democracy, and signal America’s support. Solomon reports that Obama ordered the CIA to sever contacts it had with the green movement’s supporters. ‘The Agency has contingency plans for supporting democratic uprisings anywhere in the world. This includes providing dissidents with communications, money, and in extreme cases even arms,’ Solomon writes. ‘But in this case the White House ordered it to stand down.’”
Obama engaged in a unilateral withdrawal of American tanks and anti-tank aircraft from Europe in early 2014, a clear and open slap at America’s NATO allies. There is a fascinating sidebar to this item. When candidate Donald Trump suggested that NATO members be pressured into paying their fair percentage of defense spending, the U.S. media accused him of potentially abandoning Europe. When President Obama withdrew the backbone of U.S. forces, those same media sources were utterly silent. Indeed, except for the military newspaper Stars and Stripes, the New York Analysis of Policy and Government, and a few specialty publications, the move was barely reported at all.
In complete violation of U.S. treaty obligations to the Ukraine, the White House failed to take any serious steps, other than minor sanctions, against the Kremlin in response to its Ukrainian invasion. The President could have easily imposed a massive cost on Russia by opening up U.S. federal lands to energy exploitation, which would have hit both the Russian influence on Europe and its ability to fund its misadventures.
It wasn’t just nation-states that were abandoned. He failed to take into consideration the plight of Cuban dissidents when he opened relations with Cuba (a month after Havana agreed to let the Russian navy back in!) He failed to dwell on the oppression of dissidents in Iran and China in his discussions with the governments of those nations.
Despite the continuous and blatant violations of trust and treaties with American allies, the Obama Administration never paid a domestic political price for its betrayals thanks to a fawning media that did its best to ignore the perfidious actions. What is even more worrisome is the manner in which Mr. Obama unilaterally turned U.S. foreign policy upside down without the consent of Congress.