Mobacracy – USA Gov Policy

There is an underlying tone in the discussions that journalists, politicians, academics, business leaders, and everyday citizens have among themselves. It is the fear of the mob.

It began first on college campuses, where mobs have prevented non-leftist speakers from addressing students, and discouraged such individuals from even being invited on campus. The problem rapidly grew from attacking free speech to attacking people.

Jeremiah Poff, writing in The College Fix in 2019, reported: “Throughout this fall semester, conservative activists at campuses across the nation have continued to be physically attacked — and had their displays destroyed — by aggressive student peers inflamed by right-of-center messaging…“[The] most recent incidents are just the latest in a long line of campus bullying and intimidation targeting conservatives.”

The trend spread to the streets, which have become unsafe for people expressing support for non-leftist causes. The matter was recently evident when participants in a pro-Trump rally in Washington were attacked.

Making the problem far worse is the almost total refusal of the mainstream media to adequately report its existence. “When violent far left-wing extremists organize violence online, you can always count on the Twitter hall monitors to ignore it,” Mike Cernovich, political commentator, has written.

Coverage of even the most serious acts committed by Progressive perpetrators fairly quickly leave the news cycle. Barely remembered now, due to this intentional news coverup, is the 2017 attempt at the mass assassination of Republican congressmen at a baseball practice, in which four individuals were shot, the most serious being Rep. Steve Scalise. (R-Louisiana), by James Hodgkinson, a left-wing activist.

The refusal to acknowledge left wing violence can be discerned in Hollywood’s popular entertainment venues. There is a common plot in many television dramas. A horrible crime or act of terror is committed, and all indications point to a left-wing extremist group. But in the final moments, the real culprit is exposed to be a right-wing businessman or conservative politician. The message is clear: those in the center and on the right are bad guys, and it’s OK to attack them. After all, as Hillary Clinton proclaimed during a 2016 Democrat primary debate, Republicans are “the enemy.”

There are a lot of treatment options viagra free delivery available today to treat erectile dysfunction. Apparently, the solutions would be proper driver’s training, cialis generico canada stricter laws on driving, traffic rules and regulations and so on. Simal Soin, at cosmetic dermatology India, have a special name to themselves but nevertheless, compromise the identical brand name mixture which makes buy cheap cialis click for source now it useful , safe and less expensive simultaneously . Once they are a few weeks generic tadalafil cipla into their regimens, they will have a much better idea of whether or not the drugs seem to be working.

Antifa, the left-wing masked stormtroopers who specialize in street rioting, property damage, and physical assaults, have continuously received protected status despite their vivid record of mass violence, mayhem and serious physical assaults. The mayor of one city they have victimized, Portland, Oregon, has encouraged the police to essentially stand down and surrender the streets to them during their outbreaks. As a consequence, nothing was done when journalist Andy Ngo was beaten so severely by an Antifa mob that he required hospitalization, to cite just one example.

The response to this and Antifa’s other outrages? As reported by the Daily Wire “Democrat Rep. Debra Haaland (D-NM) proclaimed that far-left extremist group Antifa consists of ‘peaceful protesters’ who are just trying to protect Portland from ‘domestic terrorism.’”

Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Ca.) instructed her followers to assault Trump cabinet members in public places. Individuals have been threatened and beaten merely for wearing “MAGA” apparel expressing support for the incumbent president. Despite the blatant, extensive, prolonged and nationwide employment of large-scale violence, leftist groups continue to be condoned and even celebrated by many politicians.

During the 2020 presidential campaign, Biden was famously reluctant to even acknowledge the Left’s penchant for violence.

All of this is particularly important in the discussions about the irregularities in the 2020 presidential campaign. Americans may argue about whether the evidence of misdeeds and the appearance of middle-of-the night Biden ballots was sufficient to overturn any particular state’s results. But it’s not just the 2020 campaign that is involved. If misdeeds are to be tolerated because the mob will riot if exposed, will there ever be a truly honest campaign in the future?

Welcome to the Mobacracy.

Illustration: Pixabay

Quick Analysis

Ukraine’s Frozen Conflict

As we approach winter in the northern hemisphere, the war in Ukraine is beginning to resemble a “frozen conflict” from many perspectives. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky recently told the media he hopes the war will end faster once President-elect Trump takes over in January. Opinions in Moscow, however, differ from that of the Ukrainian leader. Russian President Vladimir Putin argues that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) needs to exclude Ukraine from joining in “exchange” for peace. If it does not, he says, then no end to the war is in sight. So far there is no Christmas solution. Several NATO countries, according to Vladimir Socor of the Jamestown Foundation, are tentatively considering “coalitions-of-the-willing” to provide security for Ukraine outside of the formal NATO framework. There is, however, no collective mechanism today under which such an arrangement is viable. According to the NATO Charter, while Ukraine is a NATO partner country, it may not join as a full member since it has not fulfilled the requirements for membership. That has not stopped NATO and allies from continuing “to provide Ukraine with unprecedented levels of support, helping to uphold its fundamental right to self-defence,” according to the organization. Socor says that keeping Ukraine out of NATO will not advance peace with Russia. Waiting for a peace settlement, he suggests, would only serve to encourage Moscow to continue the war indefinitely. Although the Biden Administration officially withdrew its support for Ukrainian membership in 2021, NATO maintains an “open door” policy toward membership-seeking countries. The current White House position led the way for European states to oppose Ukraine’s membership saying that a decision should be delayed until “conditions are met.” Biden pushed for changing “open door” to a “bridge” metaphor. It is not intended as an across-the-board NATO policy and has been implemented in the past on a case-by-case basis, says Socor. “The alliance’s open-door policy was not fully insulated from Russia’s non-statutory blocking power, and NATO-aspirant countries’ path toward membership was not always irreversible.” Russia has successfully blocked states like Georgia from joining, first in 2008 and again after the war in Ukraine began in 2014. Russia recognizes the value add of Ukraine to NATO is enormous and that Kyiv has a better case than some other nations. Putin’s invasion was, in part, intended to foreclose that option. By 2021, Moscow was pushing hard to maximize its war objectives, which included further annexations of Ukrainian territory. A main goal for Putin was, and is, to ensure there is no Ukraine left to join NATO. As President-elect Trump prepares to assume office in January, he is faced with the historical challenges presented by the war. Post-conflict security guarantees were the center of several proposals made during the 2023 military stalemate. The incoming Trump Administration has yet to outline how it intends to handle the Russia-Ukraine war. Analysts in Washington believe that the new Administration will expect its European allies to guarantee the majority of Ukraine’s security needs. As we approach 2025, several European nations have acknowledged that they do not view Ukraine as eligible for NATO membership as it would draw the organization into the middle of the conflict. Others want to wait until the war is over or pending a “peace” settlement before considering Ukrainian membership. Socor reports that some “influential voices” are suggesting that “Kyiv should join NATO after “freezing” the war along a stable armistice line, de facto accepting Ukraine’s partition, with NATO security guarantees applying de jure to the government-controlled territory only.” This would mean starting accession talks soon with the actual talks to commence only after a ceasefire is in place. Trump arrives in Washington at a time when Putin’s hybrid strategies of war in Ukraine have eviscerated commonly-held differences between war and peace. “Absent a political consensus in NATO over Ukrainian membership, certain European allies, including France’s President Emmanuel Macron, are holding informal consultations about post-conflict security guarantees to Kyiv by NATO members outside of NATO’s framework,” according to the Jamestown Foundation. The Biden Administration downplayed the discussions on possible forms of military assistance and defense industry cooperation by sending only an Assistant Secretary of State. For a European peace to hold the Trump Administration would need to formally extend the United States’ nuclear deterrence to Ukraine. Options under discussion in Europe include a “coalition of the resolute” to deploy forces to Ukraine as part of a possible armistice package, deterring further Russian attacks, says Secor. European officials are also debating, without any agreement, whether its military forces could perform non-combat logistical roles to free Ukrainian forces to fight. None of the possible courses of action has moved forward as all eyes are waiting on the incoming Trump Administration for clues about its intended level of support for a NATO framework and other non-NATO proposals. Daria Novak served in the U.S. State Dept.