Iran has vocally dismissed any potential of living up to the promises it made regarding its nuclear weapons program. Russia has stolen territory from Ukraine, moved tactical nuclear missiles to its European border, and established military ties with Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua. China, too, has established military ties in Latin America, openly threatens its Asian neighbors, steals offshore assets from the Philippines, attacks Vietnamese ships, and, lest we forget, continues to occupy Tibet. Both Moscow and Beijing continue to dramatically build up their militaries to levels far higher than what they possessed during the Cold War. Al Qaeda has expanded its influence in the Middle East, and grows stronger in Africa. North Korea has developed the capacity to launch a nuclear-armed missile at the United States, and the resulting EMP blast could literally destroy all modern infrastructure in the contiguous 48 states.
In reply, the President, in his West Point speech, called for a less military-centric U.S. foreign policy, and continues to cut military funding. He does, however, continue to defend his intervention in Libya and calls for more US assistance to Syrian rebels, two moves that have absolutely nothing to do with American interests or national security.
Approved by the Food & Drug Association (FDA), this medicinal product is widely utilized by tadalafil free the elderly group. It india generic tadalafil takes time to act and therefore should be handled with care. The kamagra pills viagra free sample for sale that is available online are clinically tested to guarantee satisfactory results at much affordable cost. So by ignoring female viagra uk the root cause these symptoms can continue to exist undetected. It is neither overtly political nor needlessly confrontational to ask Mr. Obama what he seeks to accomplish with his foreign policy, other than a less influential America, and why, despite the manifest failures of his actions (the “Russian Reset,” his support for the Arab Spring which strengthened the Moslem Brotherhood, his pivot to Asia that failed because the Navy lacked sufficient ships, his soft position on anti-U.S. states in Latin America, his withdrawal of all US tanks from Europe, his refusal to back our Asian allies victimized by China, etc.) he refuses to change course.
An elected leader in a free nation always owes an explanation of his actions and goals to the citizenry, particularly when those actions have resulted in dramatic setbacks for the national interests. Mr. Obama and his supporters continue to allege that those very legitimate questions are mere political bickering. They are not.