Ignoring Bipartisanship – USA Gov Policy

The news media hasn’t dwelled very much on the near-unanimous bipartisan success of two legislative items concerning Hong Kong and animal cruelty, discussed in a prior New York Analysis of Policy and Government article. One concerned the prevention of animal cruelty. The other, actually a collection of two bills, dealt with measures aimed at Beijing for its attempts to illegally deprive the people of Hong Kong of their civil rights.

Bipartisanship can occur. There is another version of America, not covered by the media, desperately wishing that the nation’s business would start to take precedence over party politics. But the news media doesn’t like that idea—it’s not controversial, and doesn’t provide ratings or clickbait. Nor does it comply with its hard-left political leanings.

There is clearly a cancer in the news business. Recently, the Washington Times reported that Bloomberg News has blatantly stated that they would not cover investigate Democrat candidates, while continuing to examine President Trump. “Shortly after the billionaire jumped Sunday into the 2020 race, Bloomberg News Editor-in-Chief John Micklethwait said in a staff memo that the news division would refrain from investigating Mr. Bloomberg, his finances and his family, describing that policy as part of its journalism ‘tradition.’ In addition, he said, Bloomberg News will refrain from conducting investigations into Mr. Bloomberg’s Democratic rivals — but will continue to investigate President Trump and his administration — and that several Bloomberg editors and editorial board members will jump temporarily to the campaign.

While dwelling almost pathologically on any inartful use of language or Twitter decorum by Republicans, extremely bizarre statement by Democrats are barely mentioned. Former presidential candidate, Senator, Secretary of State and First Lady Hillary Clinton was a virtual production line for statements that would have ruined any GOP career, but she remained largely shielded by many key media sites. Just one example: “Who is going to find out? These women are trash. Nobody’s going to believe them,” speaking of the accusing statements made by women her husband molested or raped.

All of which brings former Vice President Joe Biden into the discussion. Biden has a long history of truly weird acts and comments, which have received more play on Saturday Night Live then they have in establishment news sources. His invasion of the personal space of females young and old has been caught numerous times on camera. His antics, most notably in the vice-presidential debate with Paul Ryan, were outside the bounds of any definition of normality. But these have received scant notice.

Assists with shorter work for eager moms, and additionally essentially less need for medicine, a great deal less despondency and nervousness, and shorter healing center remains. viagra soft tablet If you are depressed or having anxieties, stay away from situations that amerikabulteni.com generic tadalafil cause these emotional unbalances. However, there is an tadalafil in canada added bonus to this method since it also helps you achieve and maintain a solid erection. UK citizens have been struggling to come to terms with the fact and investigate the viagra free consultation cause of the impotence in men.

Now, however, Biden is, according to some estimates, a front runner for the 2020 presidential election. According to some estimates, he is far ahead of his rivals in national ratings. There are serious questions about his mental fitness for the position. America has survived presidents lacking personal scruples (think Bill Clinton), odd personalities (Richard Nixon) and many who were ineloquent. But there are serious questions about his mental fitness, and that is whole other level of concern.

These concerns are not just the criticism of Republicans or conservatives, or even his Democratic primary opponents. (By the way, the portrayal of Biden as a moderate are as far off as the attempts to characterize him as a “blue collar” guy. His policies are solidly on the elite left. He only looks less radical when compared to the most extreme elements of his party.) They come from individuals who one would reasonably assume would be firmly in Biden’s camp.

Biden served as President Obama’s Vice President, and was wholly supportive of him and his policies. Obama’s refusal to endorse Biden or support his campaign in any way speaks volumes. It gets worse for the ex-VP. Obama campaign strategist and key Democrat operative David Axelrod has been especially critical.

Many in the media see Biden as the strongest candidate to defeat President Trump, and so reporting on the possibility of mental fitness issues has been light. The barons of the media seem to prefer partisanship to the safety of the nation.

Photo: Pixabay

Quick Analysis

Putin’s Saber Rattling

Earlier this week, President Biden reversed his 2022 decision, authorizing the provision of antipersonnel land mines to the Ukrainian government. It follows an earlier Administration authorization to allow the use of an advanced American missile system capable of striking as deep as 100 miles inside Russian territory. The US election season may be ending, but both Russia and the West show no indication of stepping down the conflict. Russian propaganda continues to swell as the Kremlin increases its threats to use nuclear weapons against the West. Last week Andrey Sushentsov, program director of the pro-Kremlin think tank Valdai Discussion Club (VDC), published an article on growing nuclear tensions in the region. Official Russian language in the last few years has been threatening. Since the US election, rhetoric like that in the Sushentsov article, has approached the level of nuclear blackmail. The VDC article’s main theme centers on Russia’s intent to directly confront the West militarily if the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) becomes involved in Russia’s conflict with Ukraine. “On the one hand, these threats are intended to frighten the West, but on the other, Russian propagandists themselves are starting to believe in the inevitability of escalation,” according to Ksenia Kirillova of the Jamestown Foundation. On November 11, Sushentsov wrote that “The conflict will reach a completely new level, with unpredictable consequences for Europe and the entire world.” Kirillova points out that Putin’s distorted image of the world is divorced from reality and is causing the Kremlin to issue demands that are impossible to fulfill. Financial and other Russian resources needed to support Putin’s war are growing scarcer at the same time. This week the Kremlin announced a reduction of payments to its soldiers. Recently North Korea acknowledged it was sending soldiers to fight in Ukraine as Putin is running out of bodies to use as cannon fire. The war is not going well for Russia. One question floating around the Washington intelligence community is whether Putin will act out of desperation before President-elect Trump assumes office. In recent months the Russian propaganda machine is spewing out materials from fairly reputable analytical platforms inside the country. Kirillova says that “Kremlin ‘experts’ do not conceal that such threats are only intended to break the West psychologically, as they themselves are not prepared for full-scale nuclear war.” Despite Russia’s lack of preparation for an all-out war with the West, the expanding nuclear rhetoric carries with it an increase in the threat of a full-scale war in multiple theaters of operation. In June 2023 a founder of the Russian Council on Foreign and Defense Policy, Sergey Karaganov, called for “delivering a pre-emptive strike of retaliation” on Poland to force the West to surrender. In the previous month, Dmitry Suslov, a direct of research programs at the policy center proposed organizing “a demonstration nuclear explosion” aimed at intimidating the West. In September, President Putin announced a reappraisal of Russian nuclear doctrine after speaking earlier in the year at the plenary session of the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum and jokingly calling Suslov a “scary person.” Pavel Baev, writing in the European Daily Monitor, says “Putin intends his announcement to mark an escalation of nuclear brinkmanship and influence the proceedings of future Ukrainian peace efforts.” Putin is expanding the list of environmental conditions that are acceptable for using a nuclear weapon and incorporating it into Russian military doctrine. Baev adds that “The ups and downs of Russian brinkmanship are disconnected from the kinetic battles of the war, correlating instead with Ukrainian peace offensives, such as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s first peace summit in Bürgenstock, Switzerland.” Despite the increase in vitriolic language, in a You Tube video published a week before the US presidential election, Karaganov openly assured the West the primary goal of the escalation is to break the American spirit and that of the West, not outright nuclear war. By Election Day in the US, with political prognosticators predicting a win for former president Trump, Karaganov changed his tune and called for an increased role in nuclear deterrence. Kirillova points out that Western concessions to Russia are unlikely to reduce the risk of nuclear escalation. The distorted reality inside the Kremlin continues to push that President-elect Trump is an adherent of “world government,” that Ukraine will create a nuclear weapon, and Russia must prepare for a nuclear conflagration to achieve its ambitions for a new world order. President-elect Trump has indicated he will not agree to concessions that destabilize Europe, the Middle East or other regions. Going forward a strong US foreign policy may be the most stabilizing course the West can count on to restrain Putin and his intent to rebuild the Russian empire. Daria Novak served in the U.S. State Dept. Illustration: Pixabay

Our Latest Television Program

New Era in World Affairs

There will be a dramatic change in Washington in the aftermath of the election. What will this mean for America’s national security and foreign affairs? Our guests, former CIA officer and Vice President at the Center for Security Policy Clair Lopez, along with ret. Col. John Mills, (author of The Nation Will Follow) provide extraordinary insights. If you missed the program on your local station, catch it here: https://rumble.com/v5oonnb-the-american-political-zone-november-12-2024.html