Why is America so close to being ripped apart, with differences that appear to be irreconcilable?
The United States, with its vast diversity in ethnic and religious groups as well as political perspectives, has not, with the exception of when the Union was divided by those who sought to preserve slavery, been torn asunder.
That reason is twofold.
The First Amendment allowed contentious perspectives to play out to the fullest extent. All the shouting and arguing resulted in volatile differences being aired out and defused.
A fair election system, invigorated and fueled by journalism, made solving differences at the ballot box instead of the battlefield a viable alternative to violence and division.
These attributes have been misunderstood abroad. According to one former State Department official, The Chinese government believed that during the 2000 “hanging chad” election, the nation was about to be tossed into massive disorder.
Those two unique civic virtues are now being threatened.
The censorship imposed by social media giants, and the “cancel culture” throughout academia, the media, and corporate America has prevented honest and thorough discourse in the public square. Those challenges are magnified by a journalistic environment that has changed emphasis from informing the public, to telling the public what to think.
For such individuals and section of the society, pharmaceutical market has come up with a cheaper yet effective option viagra levitra online is to purchase Silagra pills. It has a number of minerals as well as organic mushrooms (which are neither on line cialis use this link creatures nor plants) revealed to ultraviolet-B (UVB) rays [2, 2a]. So, the mentioned drugs are of purchase generic levitra devensec.com same genre of the main branded medicine. The online drug suppliers deliver these products in order purchase generic viagra to satisfy your specific needs in just few months.A study in Tablet found that “Between 2017 and 2018, trust in media…dropped from 47% to 42%. Trust in government declined even more precipitously, with a 14-percentage-point drop in the number of people who said they trusted the U.S. to ‘do what is right.’ While those numbers rebounded by a few points in 2019, Americans’ overall faith in the country remained dismal: A mere 20%…And that’s the insidious thing about a culture where trust is eroding: A majority of people don’t even have to support or participate in cancel culture for it to wreak havoc on society at large…Without trust, we become fearful and desperate to exert control. Instead of terrorism or violence or a boogeyman lurking in the bushes with a gun and a roll of duct tape, we suspect the ordinary person sitting next to us, who suspects us in return. We are less charitable, more judgmental, and more likely to go to extremes—including violence…”
It is undeniable that the 2020 election has torn America further apart than at any time since the 1860’s. The harsh divide did not end with the conclusion of the balloting and the inauguration of the new president. The reasons for that are due to both censorship and cancel culture, as well as the appropriate loss of confidence in the electoral system itself.
Terrified editors of both print and electric media mandate that writers and newscasters preface remarks about the very real irregularities in the 2020 ballot with disclaimers that the complaints are false, despite an almost overwhelming abundance of evidence that procedures were changed without the required legislative approval. A mere mention of the phrase “Stolen Election” may get one kicked off of YouTube and Facebook.
Journalists, who in the past have been so vital a part of the electoral system by keeping the people informed and allowing discourse to replace discord, utterly failed in their duty during the last presidential election. Their extreme partisanship in favor of Biden was undeniable. That trait was made far worse by their willingness to lie on his behalf, and obscure key facts concerning major issues that were damaging to his candidacy.
The United States Supreme Court’s refusal to hear the complaints about irregularities in the election procedures could have accomplished what journalists were unwilling to do: provide a forum for both sides to be heard in a fair manner. The highest court’s failure to do so, including on one petition from a majority of the states, ended the last, best chance to lower tensions and restore some semblance of national unity.
The Journalism, state election systems, and the Supreme Court must examine their consciouses and their actions in order to bring America back together.
Illustration: Pixabay