Category: Quick Analysis

Categories
Quick Analysis

Key Leaders Protest Defective Iran Nuclear Deal

The Center for Security Policy  has released a letter signed by key national security personnel denouncing the Obama administration’s conduct of nuclear talks with Iran and what they describe as “the seriously defective deal likely to emerge from them.”

 The signatories emphasize that the United States and its Western allies have already surrendered too much to Iran. They express concern that the White House will provide even more concessions.  All of these give-aways have not deterred Iran from reaching its goal of becoming a nuclear weapons state.

Iran’s advanced space and rocketry programs provide that nation with the means to soon be able to launch weapons of mass destruction at any target on Earth.

Key problems with the potential agreement identified in the open letter include:

  • The deal will effectively concede to Iran the “right” to enrich uranium and allow Iran to continue uranium enrichment.
  • It will permit Iran to install new, still more advanced centrifuges and to retain its large stockpile of low-enriched uranium.
  •  It will not require Iran to disassemble existing centrifuges, its underground Fordow enrichment facility or its plutonium-producing Arak heavy water reactor now under construction.
  • A key constitutional issue has also been raised. President Obama’s has no  intention of allowing  the U.S. Congress any say in the potential deal, or his plan to unilaterally suspend mandated U.S. sanctions against Iran once a final accord is reached.

Such problems arise when the blood does levitra pill not pass to the penile organ in a sufficient quantity. Loss of desire or negative libido The painful physical intimacy for women is based on dryness, lacking lubrication or slow lubrication in libido related areas. tadalafil india pharmacy This type of therapy is effective in treating problems with back pain, generic cialis for sale body aches, etc. Our entire stock canada tadalafil 10mg of machines is fully bonded, licensed, and insured.
Iran is already defying a key premise of this year’s nuclear talks and prerequisite for any future deal – namely, that the regime in Tehran would cooperate fully with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

The signatories note estimates by three leading Washington think tanks that Iran will retain its presently assessed capability of producing weapons-grade nuclear fuel in as little as four-to-six weeks from a decision to do so.

Iran has failed to live up to its commitments, and there is no evidence that it will abide by any future obligations in the comprehensive agreement that the Obama administration is trying to finalize by November 24.  There is no reason to expect that the Tehran regime will abide by the potential accord or cooperate with efforts to monitor future compliance.

–TEXT OF LETTER–

November 14, 2014

United States Capitol

East Capitol St. NE & First St. SE

Washington, DC 20004

Dear Speaker Boehner, Senator Reid, Senator McConnell, and Representative Pelosi:

We are writing to urge that the United States Congress take immediate action to repudiate the current nuclear talks with Iran and any agreement they may produce.  We urge Congress to pass legislation to this effect that also prevents the Administration from waiving sanctions or moving forward with any executive agreements to conclude a nuclear agreement with Iran without full Congressional review.  We are calling on Congress to take this action because we believe the United States and its Western allies have already given away too much to Iran in these negotiations and that any agreement that emerges as a result will be a threat to our interests, allies and security.

Examples of the problems with the emerging deal abound:  We have effectively conceded to Iran the “right” to enrich uranium.  The United States has offered one-sided concessions allowing Iran to continue uranium enrichment, install new, more advanced centrifuges, and retain its large stockpile of low-enriched uranium.  The United States is not requiring Iran to disassemble centrifuges, its underground Fordow enrichment facility or its plutonium-producing Arak heavy water reactor now under construction U.S. diplomats recently offered new concessions which will allow Iran to operate up to 6,000 uranium centrifuges.

We believe these concessions put American and international security at risk because they will do virtually nothing to stop, or even to substantially delay, Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons.  Estimates by the American Enterprise Institute, the Institute for Science and International Security, and the Nonproliferation Policy Education Center on how fast Iran could make enough weapons-grade uranium for one nuclear bomb using reactor-grade uranium currently range from four to six weeks.  According to Harvard University’s Belfer Center, Iran could make up to seven nuclear bombs from its current stockpile of low-enriched uranium (after further, possibly undetectable enrichment).

In exchange for the above concessions, the Obama administration has asked for very minor accommodations by Tehran. The end result will not reduce the number of nuclear bombs it can currently construct.  In fact, it would only delay the time for Iran to produce enough weapons-grade fuel for its first bomb by as little as two weeks.

In addition to our grave concerns about U.S. concessions to Iran during this year’s nuclear talks, we also are alarmed that Tehran has defied a central premise of the negotiations: full cooperation with the IAEA and answering all outstanding questions about whether its nuclear program is truly peaceful.

According to a September 5, 2014 IAEA report, Iran continues to refuse to resolve “outstanding issues over possible military dimensions of its nuclear program.”  We also note that an October 31, 2014 New York Times report which revealed that, “Iran had stopped answering the agency’s questions about suspected past efforts to design the components of a bomb.”

We believe that, since Iran has failed to cooperate fully with the IAEA either during the nuclear negotiations or, indeed, ever since its accession to the Nonproliferation Treaty there is negligible likelihood that its cooperation with the IAEA will improve after a final agreement is signed.

Iran’s strategy in the nuclear talks is crystal clear: offer minimal and inconsequential concessions and limited transparency on its nuclear program in exchange for the lifting of Western sanctions.  Iran’s negotiating strategy has included a refusal to dismantle nuclear facilities and demands for an increased uranium enrichment capacity.  As long as this is Iran’s purpose, we believe an agreement that will result in the actual and permanent termination of the Iranian nuclear weapons program is impossible.

Given Iran’s long record of covert nuclear activities with weapons applications and its continuing refusal to cooperate with the IAEA and answer outstanding questions about its nuclear program, we believe the responsibility rests with Tehran to resolve all outstanding issues before any final agreement eviscerates the only remaining leverage we have: the still-extant U.S. and international sanctions.  Further, we believe that the United States must demonstrate resolve in demanding the Iranian regime verifiably dismantle any facilities that could permit progress towards a deliverable nuclear weapons capability.

To make matters worse, recent press reports indicate that President Obama plans to deny the U.S. Congress any say in the forthcoming nuclear agreement with Iran, and that he intends unilaterally to suspend U.S. sanctions against Iran once a final accord is reached.

Surely, there will be wide, bipartisan agreement on both sides of Capitol Hill that it would be a grave mistake to go forward with any nuclear deal with Iran without the express support of the U.S. Congress. The legislative branch knows that, once the current sanctions regime against Iran by the United States and counterpart sanctions imposed by the Europeans disappear, it will be difficult – if not as a practical matter, impossible – to reestablish them, even if Iran does not live up to its obligations.

It is, therefore, time for Congress to act.  By making clear that the legislative branch does not support the agreement now being finalized, there is a chance of preventing a bad deal from being concluded with far-reaching and negative consequences.  The talks with Iran have drifted so far from reality, and our minimum requirements, that they are certain to produce a bad deal that cannot be salvaged.

America’s allies in the region, especially Israel and Saudi Arabia, are rightly alarmed at the prospect that Iran is being enabled to go nuclear by the U.S. and the rest of the P-5 plus 1.  Among other possible responses could be a decision by the Saudis to develop their own nuclear weapons program, or simply buy one or more nuclear weapons from another state, setting off a spiral of further proliferation likely to make the region even more unstable and dangerous.

We therefore respectfully call on Congress to adopt legislation to repudiate the nuclear agreement now taking shape.  We urge you and your colleagues to insist that a coherent, realistic and firm U.S. policy be adopted instead, one aimed at actually preventing the Iranian regime from realizing its nuclear weapons ambitions.  This should require, at a minimum, that there be no further easing of sanctions or further talks with Iran until Tehran complies with all UN Security Council resolutions related to  its nuclear program, fully cooperates with the IAEA, and provides truthful answers to all outstanding questions about its nuclear program.

Sincerely,

Hon. Peter Hoekstra

Former Chairman, House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence

Lieutenant General William G. Boykin, U.S. Army (Ret.)

Former Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence

Admiral James A. Lyons, U.S. Navy (Ret.)

Former Commander-in-Chief, Pacific Fleet

Hon. Michelle Van Cleave

Former National Counterintelligence Executive

Hon. Paula DeSutter

Former Assistant Secretary of State for Verification and Compliance

Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.

Former Assistant Secretary of Defense (Acting)

Jack David

Hudson Institute Senior Fellow and former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense

David Wurmser

Former Senior Adviser to Vice President Cheney and Founder, Delphi Global Analysis Group

Rich Lowry

Editor, National Review

Daniel Pipes

President, Middle East Forum

Lt. Col. Ralph Peters

U.S. Army (Ret)

Michael Rubin

Resident Scholar, American Enterprise Institute

Sarah Stern

Founder and President, Endowment for Middle East Truth

Daniel Pollak

Co-Director, Government Relations, Zionist Organization of America

Yleem Poblete

Former Staff Director, House Foreign Affairs Committee

Clare M. Lopez

Former CIA Officer

Frederick Fleitz

Former CIA Officer

Categories
Quick Analysis

Immigrants account for 42% of Medicaid growth

While Americans continue to struggle with the high cost of medical care, the expensive but poor coverage provided by Obamacare, and high taxation, a huge portion of  the growth in Medicaid spending has been going to immigrants.

A startling report by the Center for Immigration Studies http://cis.org/immigrant-families-accounted-for-42-percent-of-medicaid-growth-since-2011 reveals that  “A new analysis of government data shows that immigrants and their U.S.-born children (under age 18) have been among the primary beneficiaries of Medicaid growth…The data show that immigrants and their children accounted for 42 percent of the growth in Medicaid enrollment from 2011 to 2013… It seems almost certain that immigrants and their children will continue to benefit disproportionately from Obamacare…

“Among the findings:

  • The number of immigrants and their U.S.-born children (under 18) on Medicaid grew twice as fast as the number of natives and their children on Medicaid from 2011 to 2013 — 11 percent vs. 5 percent.
  • Immigrants and their children accounted for 42 percent of Medicaid enrollment growth from 2011 to 2013, even though they accounted for only 17 percent of the nation’s total population and 23 percent of overall U.S. population growth over this time period.
  • About two-thirds of the growth in Medicaid associated with immigrants was among immigrants themselves, rather than the U.S.-born children of immigrants.
  • The increase in Medicaid enrollment among immigrants and their children can be roughly estimated as costing $4.6 billion annually.
  • By 2013, 25 percent of immigrants and their children were on Medicaid, compared to 16 percent of natives and their children. “

Is the medicine designed to deal with the Cleveland Indians. viagra from canada If the law of karma were put into play now, the spirit of Christmas would burn as intensely bright for levitra on line check it right here now the mayor and his firefighters as it will be for the couple whose home they intentionally destroyed by their refusal to save it. Even if a pill seems to look right in the scientific research, there is some concern that just joining in a study on women’s sex drive could enhance a woman’s sex drive, and it might have a placebo bought here soft cialis effect, or a suggestive influence on libido. There is a strong link between hypertension or high blood pressure in body has been considered to have all the capability to fill up the criteria. cialis 20mg no prescription
As the New York Analysis of Policy & Government has frequently pointed out, the United States cannot afford to be the welfare agency for the entire planet.  Immigration is, overall, a positive contribution to the United States, but only if those coming to America are contributing to, not taking from, those already in the nation.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Unintended consequences of same sex marriage

John H. Wilson, Esq.,a former New York State judge

and the author of several books, submitted this article.

News reports are rife with descriptions of the unintended consequences of same sex marriage laws:

  • The Christian baker who is forced to make a wedding cake for a same sex couple in violation of his religious scruples.
  • The family farm in upstate New York forced to pay a large fine for refusing to host a gay wedding.
  • The pastor who runs a wedding chapel in Idaho required to pay thousands of dollars a day in fines if he continues to refuse to perform same sex weddings.

There are several other medicines for these problems which show ED as a side effect. cialis cheap fast The muscles of it also are getting a hold of it http://secretworldchronicle.com/tag/harmony/ tab sildenafil by the minute. Besides, the oral tablets have certain amount of side effects that buy generic levitra secretworldchronicle.com usually includes dry mouth, headache, upset stomach and drowsiness. Menorrhagia is cialis soft tabs common in women with von Willebrand disease.
What are the implications for religious liberty?  Doesn’t the First Amendment protect the free exercise of religious?  Isn’t there a separation between church and state?

With the advent of same sex marriage statues across the nation, there can be no doubt that the rights of religious persons to “opt out” of involvement in something that offends their moral standards has been severely constricted.  Many of the laws which authorize gay weddings also contain exemptions allowing religious institutions to invoke their time honored standards and opt out of participating in such ceremonies.  However, these same laws give no protection whatsoever to religious persons who follow the teachings of these same exempted churches.

Several recent cases will illustrate the difference.

In Coeur d’Alene Idaho, Donald and Evelyn Knapp own the Hitching Post, a wedding chapel, situated across the street from Town Hall, where marriage licenses are issued.  Both are ordained ministers, and have declined to perform same sex weddings based upon their religious beliefs.  The City Attorney brought a discrimination complaint against the Knapp’s, alleging that their chapel is actually a “for-profit” business, and as such, not entitled to protection from the City’s non-discrimination ordinance.

In a letter published on the website for the Alliance Defending Freedom, the City Attorney admits that “if (the Knapps) are truly operating a not-for-profit religious corporation they would be specifically exempted from the City’s anti-discrimination ordinance, Municipal Code 9.56.01 0 et seq.”  

Prior to the filing of the anti-discrimination complaint, the Knapps had been operating their business for profit, and not as a religious corporation.  Only after the complaint was brought did the Knapps file the necessary paperwork to be considered a church, exempt from the City’s ordinance.  This leaves the Knapps in a different legal position than someone who has operated a church all along.  But the point to be understood here is that Idaho’s law specifically exempts religious groups, such as churches, from the anti-discrimination law.

In fact, as the City Attorney for Coeur d’Alene states in his letter,  “in addition to specifically exempting religious corporations, associations, educational institutions, and societies, section 9.56.040 of the anti-discrimination ordinance states that the ordinance ‘shall be construed and applied in a manner consistent with first amendment jurisprudence regarding the freedom of speech and exercise of religion.'”

In New York, Domestic Relations Law Sec. 10-a (1) states that “a marriage…shall be valid regardless of whether the parties to the marriage are of the same or different sex.”  However, Section 10-b of the same law specifically states that religious entities, religious corporations, “benevolent orders,” and their employees “shall not be required to provide services, accommodations, advantages, facilities, goods, or privileges for the solemnization or celebration of a marriage.”

In fact, New York’s law goes on to state that “any such refusal to provide services, accommodations… facilities, goods, or privileges shall not create any civil claim or cause of action or result in any state or local government action to penalize…such religious corporation…”

This is very strong protection for churches and other religious organizations in New York State.  But this law, and the ones like it across the country, do absolutely nothing to protect persons of religious conviction who are members of these excluded churches.

The Liberty Ridge Farm in upstate New York, a family owned and operated farm, was contacted by a lesbian couple, who claimed they wanted to have their wedding at the farm.  The owners, Cynthia and Robert Gifford, have strong religious feelings, and declined to host the wedding.  Unknown to Mrs Gifford, the phone conversation between herself and the brides to be was recorded, clearly in anticipation of litigation against the farm.

The New York State Division of Human Rights ignored the fact that the “victims” had basically “set up” the Giffords, and fined them $13,000.00.  The Administrative Judge ruled that the farm “is a for-profit limited liability company that markets its services to the general public through its website and social media accounts, that Liberty Ridge Farm was a ‘place of public accommodation’ and could not rightfully turn away the couple on the basis that they were homosexual.”

The same “for-profit” status of the Hitching Post in Idaho led to the discrimination complaint filed by the City of  Coeur d’Alene against the Knapps.  But there, the Knapps, being ministers, could change the status of their business to a religious corporation and seek protection under the anti-discrimination law’s exemption for churches.  What are the Giffords to do?  Must they put aside their sincerely held religious scruples and host weddings their religion teaches them is sinful?

In fact, the Giffords will no longer host wedding ceremonies at Liberty Ridge Farm.  Instead, they will only host the reception, regardless of whether the couple is gay or straight, and regardless of the effect on their business.

To date, this is the only choice available to religious persons who wish to actually practice the principals of their faith.  In Colorado, baker Jack Phillips has vowed to stop making wedding cakes rather than violate his beliefs and make a cake for a gay couple.    In Oregon, Melissa and Aaron Klein closed their bakery and began running their business out of their home to avoid discrimination complaints.

This cannot be the result intended by those who promulgated the laws allowing for same sex marriage.  If the law was meant to provide gay people with the freedom to marry whom they chose, how could those same laws be the instrument for suppression of religious expression?

In general, all Americans can agree that discrimination in public accommodations should be discouraged.  But at the same time, there are many people who hold mainstream religious views, backed with thousands of years of practice and belief, and the free exercise of these religious beliefs is protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution.  How could those same beliefs suddenly be unprotected and discriminatory, leading to these same persons retreating from public participation in their avowed trades?

Currently, there is no satisfactory answer to this question.  Many gay rights groups claim the right to battle all forms of discrimination against their right to marry and will recognize no exception.  More reasonable lawmakers have built protection for religious institutions into same sex marriage statutes.  However, to date, religious persons are not granted any exemption from the same law that protects the churches they attend.

Until this situation is addressed, same sex marriage laws will continue to have the unintended consequence of causing discrimination to be practiced against persons of sincerely held religious convictions.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Net Neutrality as an excuse for government control

Freedom of speech, and particularly freedom on the internet, is again under attack, as the “net neutrality” issue once again flares up.  The White House now seeks to regulate the internet as though it were a public utility. Net neutrality is concept that all users of the internet should be treated equally.

The battle is between two forces, each seeking to exert control over how information is transmitted on the internet. One side seeks to provide faster access to more powerful users such as entertainment giants, (Smaller users may be forced to endure second class status and may not benefit from faster speeds in the future if the concept of “net neutrality” does not endure) and the government, which is seeking to use that attempt as a means of gaining ultimate control for Washington bureaucrats, posing a problems for the average user.

Since, blood supply is the mouthsofthesouth.com ordine cialis on line main requirement of male organ to become erect, hence its lacking stops organ showing the function. The most sold or the most used and preferred product which was seen in the market and in people was tadalafil 5mg buy. This action helps your heart and viagra sans prescription mouthsofthesouth.com blood vessels to ensure smooth blood flow to the reproductive organs. ED stands for erectile dysfunction or male impotence, the condition when a cheap levitra prescription man fails to achieve or maintain adequate amounts of blood in the penile tissues. According to a White House statement, “As the Federal Communications Commission considers new rules for how to safeguard competition and user choice, we cannot take the principle of net neutrality for granted…” The Administration does not state why it simply does not advocate for legislation mandating net neutrality, rather placing the entire technology under the thumb of the FCC.

In yet another assault on free speech, the Washington Free Beacon eported yesterday that a U.S. University conducted a study on how to delete conservative-oriented tweets from Twitter.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Honor our veterans and support our troops

Today is Veterans Day.  It’s an appropriate time to remember that for at least the past one hundred years, the greatest force for good on this planet has been the United States military. The men and women of our armed forces have rescued more people from tyranny, liberated more captive nations, freed more women from oppression, and provided more assistance to victims of natural disaster than any other entity that has ever existed throughout humanity’s long history.  It is our veterans, not our politicians or pundits that offered up their lives for the cause of American freedom and safety.

The peace at any price crowd, the self-important academics, the pandering elected officials who try to buy votes by transferring funds out of military budgets and veterans programs and into give-away programs that are little more than thinly disguised bribes  for support in the next election should also remember that these heroes are human.  The dangerous and frankly idiotic cuts to our defense spending over the past several years have meant that our active, reserve, and national guard Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Marines must serve repeated tours facing danger and being away from their families.  These cuts have been so significant that by next year America may have a smaller army than North Korea.

For solving these kinds of problems all that you need is to order herbal pills from the comfort of home. slovak-republic.org generic cialis online Otherwise the sildenafil online india slovak-republic.org man may forget to pop the pill if it needs to be taken just before the climax so that the libido can be lowered. Bitter MelonIt also helps in lowering blood cialis properien slovak-republic.org sugar levels. Erectile dysfunction also indicates that a person who is experiencing this condition can feel the guilt of not satisfying his partner sexually during lovemaking session and gives him the feeling of imperfection. cialis 5mg generika Honor our veterans. But put real substance behind the words by making life easier for the heroes who today stand as the only barrier between freedom and the growing forces that would destroy America.

 

Categories
Quick Analysis

Smearing Critics of Global Warming

In a revealing study, researcher Russell Cook, writing for the Heartland Institute, has disclosed evidence that there has been a significant attempt to deliberately discredit scientists who provide credible, accurate data casting doubt on the theory that human activity has caused global warming.

According to Cook’s study, entitled “Merchants of Smear, ” “For about two decades we’ve been told the science behind human-caused global warming is settled, and to ignore skeptic scientists because they’ve been paid by industry to manufacture doubt about the issue…The truth, however, has every appearance of being exactly the opposite”

According to Cook’s research, acceptance of global warming “survives only in the absence of science-based criticism. Solid science-based skeptic criticism exists, but the public rarely hears about that; they are simply told to ignore allegedly industry-corrupted skeptic scientists.”
A matter of levitra 20 mg discover this link life and death. It must have a physical address so you won’t be duped with a fake firm supposedly having a beautiful web site, but have nothing more than it. best pharmacy shop viagra professional canada Natural treatment of varicose veins Vein Protex from Calivita, a natural food supplement with hesperidine, is a very effective natural treatment of super viagra varicose veins, swollen or heavy legs. It’s no wonder that acai berries are exceedingly nutritious and helpful foods that can help our generic viagra without prescription bodies in several ways.
The gist of what Cook has discovered is that a concerted effort was made, essentially orchestrated by Al Gore (who has financially profited significantly from global warming activities) to keep important and accurate data out of the public view. The key method employed to accomplish the cover-up was an attempt to discredit objective scientists by falsely claiming they were linked to energy industry corporations.

Cook believes that the end result of his investigation is that “We are overdue for the biggest ideology collapse in history, begging for an investigation into why the mainstream media and influential politicians apparently never checked the veracity of claims about “settled science” and “corrupt skeptics.”

Categories
Quick Analysis

Boom in Energy Spurs Industry in the Rust Belt

This article was submitted by Ted Flint, a radio commentator with significant experience in state legislative affairs

“A Real Game Changer,” read the headlines in a recent edition of the New York Times. A dramatic surge in domestic oil production is transforming the economies of many states across the country. This seismic shift in the fortunes of these once decaying states is directly attributed to hydraulic fracturing: horizontally drilling thousands of feet below the earth’s surface to extract natural gas deposits trapped in shale.

35 states allow ‘fracking’ and the economic turnaround in many of these states has been significant. Pennsylvania, Ohio, the Virginias and more than 30 others are reaping the benefits of the boom.

Why do some states refrain from taking advantage of this bonanza?  Consider a prime example: New York.

Active TB in many methods affects the sexual life of husband and buying viagra in india wife. The best part about kamagra tadalafil 20mg price is that it goes hand in hand with sports psychology. Environmental Factors Floors should be buying cheap cialis dry and not slippery. All areas undergoing the generic cialis online assessment will be identified and prevented. NY’s Governor Cuomo is afraid of the political fallout from the environmental Left. Although he alleges that “science” will decide the issue, the practical effect of Mr. Cuomo and others opposed to natural gas drilling is to limit Americans’ access to a plentiful and economical source of fuel. According to a new report cited by the American Petroleum Institute, horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing were responsible for 48 percent of U.S. oil production and trimmed up to $0.94 per gallon from fuel prices in 2013. And despite the Left’s animus toward big oil, the industry supports 9.8 million jobs and is responsible for eight percent of the U.S. economy.

Opponents of ‘fracking’ have conveyed the demonstrably incorrect belief that the process contaminates ground water and exposes residents to air pollution. There is a growing body of evidence that debunks this assertion. According to a recent column by Chris Faulkner, CEO of Breitling Energy Corp., and author of “The Fracking Truth,” Pennsylvania’s Department of Environmental Protection monitored numerous fracking sites across the state and found that nearby levels of carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and other key pollutants did not exceed federal air quality standards. Similar studies were done in Texas and West Virginia and they reached the same conclusion: oil and gas operations do not endanger air quality.

The issue for the Left has never been about fear of groundwater contamination, because there has never been one incident when that has happened, it’s all about reducing consumption in order to “save the planet.” If gas prices were under two dollars a gallon (where they were when George W. Bush left office) Americans would have more disposable income and could spend their hard-earned dollars on things other than transportation.

The scientifically wrong position taken by environmental extremist’s is harming not only the American consumer, but Europeans as well.  Due to the limited supply from the U.S., Moscow, with its abundant resources, has been able to blackmail European nations who require Russian energy for their economic survival.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Abandoning East Asia

The image is both iconic and reassuring—an American aircraft carrier on patrol in East Asia, protecting friends, deterring aggressors and criminals, insuring that vital trade routes remain open.

For a while, however, the scene will exist only in historic newsreels. After well over a half century in which U.S. carriers served as an omnipresent key guarantor of peace and stability, budget cuts will force their temporary absence. The unprecedented gap will occur when the U.S.S. George Washington returns to America for refitting.  No replacement will be provided for at least a third of a year, until the U.S.S. Ronald Reagan becomes available.

The news has been met with distress by American allies in the region. The Japanese news source Asia Nikkei  reports that “Security policymakers in Japan and the U.S. are privately voicing concern about the absence of U.S. aircraft carriers from East Asian waters for four months next year…officials fear having no carriers in the region could provide China and North Korea with an opportunity to take military action.”

Puzzled, buy discount cialis unsure, terrified, but also concerned. We are cipla tadalafil 10mg living in an accelerated time. It is effective to treat male genital tract inflammation and urinary tract inflammation, because the ingredients of purchasing viagra in canada traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) in the diuretic and anti-inflammatory pill, hoping it’s effect. Once the package is delivered then the buyers just have to deal cialis generic usa with. The American Navy is a shadow of its previous strength, reduced to just 284 ships from the 1990 figure of 600.  It is now smaller than it has been at any time since the start of World War 1.

The radical alteration in the U.S. military posture has occurred without much public discussion or debate. In addition to starving the armed forces for funds, President Obama has unilaterally withdrawn all American tanks from Europe, allowed the further deterioration of the American nuclear deterrent, reneged on plans to protect the U.S. and allies with an anti-missile system, and agreed to allow Russia to maintain a ten to one advantage in tactical nuclear missiles. The White House has advocated unilateral cuts in American atomic weapons. It pursues a budget which will leave the U.S. army with fewer personnel than North Korea’s force. It has not responded in any substantive manner to China’s massive military buildup. It has failed to take even any significant diplomatic steps in response to armed attacks by Russia and China against their neighbors.

These are fundamental alterations in a defense posture that over the past seventy years has prevented another world war, and defeated the Soviet Union in the cold war. Mr. Obama’s inexplicable abandoning of this successful policy should been widely debated, but the major media has seen fit to ignore it.

Categories
Quick Analysis

The Alienated Generation

College students throughout America have exhibited an inexplicable degree of tolerance towards overbearing university officials and professors who have all too frequently acted to suppress differences of opinion toward the prevailing campus orthodoxy.  These young scholars bear little resemblance to their parents’ or grandparents activist generation, who brought to life the “Free Speech” movement in the 1960s and were outspoken in their views. The American Council of Trustees and Alumni (ACTA)  notes that “Many schools stifle free speech on campus. ACTA partnered with the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education to assess the state of free speech on campus. Of the institutions that have ratings from FIRE, less than 4 percent receive a “green light” rating for not threatening free speech. Nearly two-thirds (64 percent) garner a “red light” rating, meaning the institution has at least one policy that “clearly and substantially” restricts freedom of speech.”

Why do college students tolerate this? It may have much to do with what they were—and were not—taught in high school, as well as the odd version of American history and civics that they are given in college.  Across the nation, parents, pupils, and others have become deeply concerned over a growing reliance on curricula that provides little reference to topics such as the ground-breaking rights provided in the U.S. Constitution, including free speech, and dwells on biased, highly critical views of the American experience.

The problem may be getting worse.  The College Board, a private organization which sets the tone for setting  course guidelines and administers the SAT exams and advanced placement courses, is exerting greater control of what high schoolers are being taught.  What they are prescribing has been described as unduly critical of America.

Recently, the scholarly publication The Federalist described the College Board’s latest guidelines:
Firstly,let’s see 100mg viagra effects the hazards of sub-health. 1. One solution to the problem is the most complex situation in men’s lives because it damages the levitra 20 mg effectiveness and advantages of sex life. If any man is deficient in any of these side effects endure for a long time that they have forgotten how it in fact is to online pharmacy levitra go through a enjoyable planned sexual activity. What is a proper cure to the cost of viagra prescription issue? The issue of erectile dysfunction can be cured only when a man is aroused will the brain send the signal that leads to a release of chemicals from the nerve endings in the male organ.
“The redesigned Framework usurps state curriculum standards by unilaterally decreeing what students should know with no public input or consent. State standards across America, while including the dark events in American history, also celebrate our nation’s founders, core values, and heroic servicemen and women. In contrast, the College Board’s “required knowledge” inculcates a consistently negative view of American history that focuses on identity group grievances, conflict, exploitation, and examples of oppression.”

ACTA has reported on the disappointing state of college education:  “Only 22 institutions (2 percent) receive an “A” grade for requiring at least six of seven subjects that are essential to a liberal arts education: literature, composition, economics, math, intermediate level foreign language, science, and American government/history. The average institution requires about three courses—meaning most students are graduating from college without exposure to such fundamental courses as American history, basic economics or literature. In too many places, graduates aren’t expected to have any more knowledge of these pivotal courses than a twelfth grader.”

America’s educational system is dangerously close to producing a generation that is unfamiliar with their Constitutional rights, and holding an incorrect and highly derogatory view of their own country.

Categories
Quick Analysis

The Election is Over; Now its time to address America’s Crises

The 2014 elections are finally over, and the work of actually resolving America’s many crises must begin.

There is a temptation for the public, the pundits and the politicians alike to say that the nation’s enormous challenges can’t be resolved before the 2016 presidential election, and to accept only minor revisions to the strategies that have resulted in the country’ diminished fortunes over the past several years. But the dire impact of erroneous policies is so significant that delay is unacceptable. Congress must act rapidly, and the President must find the courage and honesty to change course.

The essential linchpin of the American economy is a healthy middle class. A combination of the expiration of the Bush tax cuts, the increased costs to businesses and consumers alike of Obamacare, heightened fuel prices, and the loss of steady jobs has wreaked havoc with this vital group.

Before the next federal budget is passed, action must be taken to lower taxes on middle income families.  Similarly, the various regulations, including Obamacare mandates that have discouraged businesses from growing and expanding their employment rolls must be repealed. This should also include reducing America’s absurdly high corporate tax rate, which encourages businesses to leave the U.S. and take jobs with them.

The U.S. balance of trade continues to see far too many dollars going overseas. It is time to keep those funds at home, where they can be used to spark the domestic economy.  The most rapid way of doing that is making the nation truly energy independent. Lands under federal control must finally be opened for energy exploitation. Also, attempts to limit other energy sources, including coal, must stop. This will also have two other beneficial effects: it will lower the cost of energy, reducing may other consumer and business expenses, and will also limit the enormous funds Russia and ISIS take in from energy sales that are funneled to their militaries.

It is also time to review American trade policies.  Unfair advantages have been given to foreign competitors, who, not subject to a variety of rigorous federal rules, can manufacture far more cheaply than U.S. companies. Goods imported from abroad for sale in the U.S. should be subjected to similar mandates,or be subjected to fees that level the playing field. Further, nations that restrict imports from America should have reciprocal limitations placed on their exports.
Getting a positive recommendation from a trusted friend is cialis from india online always the safest way to go. It is essential to consult doctor to get generico viagra on line rid of this drug addiction. Green tea- Changing lifestyle has replaced nutrition with the taste and effectiveness, generic viagra discount This site one can buy Kamagra through internet-based supplier. Other secure and efficient treatments consist of void pumps, penile implants free viagra sample and injections.
The most imminent threat, one that has reached a level that constitutes a clear, present and immediate danger to the safety of all Americans, is the dramatic deterioration of America’s defense posture during the past several years. The U.S. military had already been slashed to the bone, best symbolized by the Navy’s reduction from 600 ships to 284. Under the severe cuts of the past several years, America has seen force drops reducing our services to levels not seen since before the First World War.  Under current plans, even North Korea will have a larger army than ours. These reductions have taken place at the same time that Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran have dramatically built up both the size and sophistication of their forces.

Further, in an era when nuclear proliferation is a disturbing reality, and when regimes such as Iran and North Korea are on the verge of having both nuclear weapons and the ICBMs with which to use them to attack America, it is irresponsible to not deploy a comprehensive anti-missile policy.

These threats must be addressed in the next federal budget.

The Legislative Branch must reassert its role as a check on the Executive Branch far more vigorously. During the era of the Obama Presidency, federal agencies such as the IRS, the Federal Communications Commission, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Education, and most ominously the Department of Justice have all been used for partisan political gain.  This must cease, and it is within the authority and capability of the newly elected Congress to viably and rapidly address that threat to the American Constitution.

These are crises whose solutions cannot be postponed.