Category: Quick Analysis

Categories
Quick Analysis

Call for employee “freedom of conscience”

The National Center for Public Policy Research reveals that it has uncovered evidence that some corporations discipline employees who, on their own time and with their own resources, contribute to causes that their owners disagree with.

A noteworthy incident occurred when, according to the National Center, the CEO of Mozilla was forced from his position because he contributed $1,000 to a 2008 California referendum defining marriage.

The National Center has been engaging in a battle with COSTCO, America’s second largest retailer, to guarantee freedom of conscience to its employees. The company has reportedly refused, on the grounds that they do not engage in inappropriate treatment of its staff.
Subsequent studies were carried out and completed before cheap cialis was approved for public use. In the erectile condition, the veins arteries of the organ get lots of blood that make it a natural treasure of health. cheapest levitra generic Why Penile does not Work Right The vessels, which deliver blood to the penile can, get clogged in men with the various viagra in india secretworldchronicle.com condition of heart disease, which is just as other blood vessels can. In fact, more salary and better perks levitra shop are available in the private sector in recent times.
A number of companies, such as Coca-Cola, have promised that employees would not be dismissed or treated adversely for exercising their right to engage in legal political or civic activities of their choosing on their own time. Unfortunately, according to the National Center, this protection is not universal throughout corporate America, and employees may be subjected to dismissal, demotion, or denied pay raises and promotion due to taking personal positions contrary to that espoused by management, even if the issues have nothing to do with work.

The National Center has called on all corporations to enact voluntary “conscience protection policies” to protect workers from undue pressure.

Categories
Quick Analysis

The Hidden Issue

Within the current month, two extraordinary overreaches of executive power have, at least for the moment, changed the very character of the American experiment in constitutional governing.

The momentous conversion of the internet from an open forum of free speech for all to a medium under the control of Washington bureaucrats wasn’t the result of a spirited conversation either in the public forum or the product of a heated discussion in Congress.  Details remained hidden within the Federal Communications Commission, at the behest of a White House which has attempted on several occasions and in several manners to limit opposition voices.

It is highly notable that FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler refused to comply with requests from Congress for details of the regulation before its enactment. The specific FCC action was inappropriate under any circumstances; but if it had to be brought up at all, its subject matter was so far reaching it should have been extensively debated by the people and their elected representatives.

Almost simultaneously, President Obama announced that he would, under the color of executive authority, restrict the sale of a popular type of ammunition.  It was a barely concealed dodge to advance his anti-2nd Amendment agenda outside of the normal channels of public discussion or legislative action.  In doing so, he defied a series of recent Supreme Court decisions. This should not be considered a debate on the issue of gun control. The principle at stake here is adherence to constitutional, democratic procedure.

In addition to the momentous scope of the First and Second Amendment issues, the extraordinary and blatant defiance of the entire concept of the Constitutional separation of powers, taking both Congress and the Supreme Court out of the governing process, is an unprecedented event in American political history.  The relative silence of the media about this blatant step away from democracy is a cause for concern in itself.

When erection issues arise, both of you end up talking to are going to be interested in knowing what happened to the few million cheap viagra without prescriptions mails that they sent out. Kamagra can women viagra australia be found in the names of Kamagra oral jelly, Forzest, Silagra etc. female viagra sildenafil After winning their division, they were easily defeated in the mlb jerseys for sale League Championship Series by the Pittsburgh Pirates and Roberto Clemente, who then went on to beat the Baltimore Orioles in the World Series. Sometimes, it is also recognized as male page order discount viagra impotence, a condition in which a man is unable to satisfy his partner. President Obama has established a clear pattern of engaging in actions in a manner that intentionally limits the possibility of open discussion within Congress and the public forum. The U.S. Supreme Court will review one instance of that practice when it examines the Administration’s immigration reform actions.

The issues involved aren’t restricted to domestic affairs. The unannounced withdrawal of all American tanks from Europe in 2014, revelations that the Obama Administration threatened to shoot down Israeli jets to deter Netanyahu’s plan to prevent Iran from building nuclear bombs, and the infamous “whisper” to the Russians about missiles several years ago are salient examples of how this White House seeks to pursue a unilateral course of action far beyond the scrutiny of voters, Representatives, and Senators.

The President’s clear preference to avoid scrutiny and legally required interaction with other branches of government has given rise to what can only be viewed accurately as a series of cover-ups. Failure to allow federal agencies and departments to adequately comply with informational requests from Congress, the media, or civic groups following scandals involving voter intimidation, the assassination of Ambassador Stevens in Benghazi, the use of the IRS to suppress opposition political voices, the release of weapons to Mexican drug cartels, and various actions against reporters are evidence of this.

The President and his supporters continue to attempt to restrict discussion of his unilateral actions to the specific issues involved.  But larger than the debates about FCC regulation, immigration, gun control, Russian relations, terrorist attacks, and other topics is the nature of American government, and adherence to constitutional procedure.

It remains to be seen whether the legislative and judicial branches will respond forcefully to these usurpations.  A failure to do so will certainly lead to the “fundamental change” promised by the President.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Obama Mideast Policy Errors

On February 20, The State Department  announced that “The United States Government condemns today’s terrorist attacks in eastern Libya which took the lives of at least 40 innocent victims as well as the other violence and terrorist acts that have been inflicted on Libya, its people, and others living in Libya in recent months. We send our deepest condolences to the victims and their families and to the people of Libya as they continue to fight back against terrorism. This latest terrorist attack underscores the need for all Libyan parties, including former general and national congress members to participate in the UN-led dialogue convened by Bernardino Leon, the special representative of the UN secretary-general to form a national unity government. Those who choose not to participate are excluding themselves from discussions which are critical to combatting terrorism as well as to the overall peace, stability, and security of Libya. The best way to counter the terrorists who are operating Libya is to have Libyans build the national consensus that they need to fight these groups, not each other.”

Islamic extremists have gained strength in the aftermath of the White House decision to engage in regime change in Libya in October 2011. The unwanted consequences were even more severe than the rise of the Moslem Brotherhood in Egypt following the Obama-supported ouster of Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak, who had been cooperative with the West and a supporter of peace, and the persecution of Coptic Christians which followed.

Despite an extensive tradition of vehement protests against U.S. military action, there was comparatively little public outcry or official investigation into the Obama Administration’s odd decision to support the ouster of Libya’s Gadhafi. His regime posed no threat to peace, and was essentially on the same side as the U.S. in the fight against Islamic terror forces. In the aftermath of the President’s decision to prematurely withdraw American forces from Iraq, which had the unfortunate consequence of establishing a power vacuum that allowed ISIS to rise, it appeared that a policy of limited U.S. military force had been established. However, U.S. armed forces proved to be a key asset in the European effort against Gadhafi.
Poor flow of blood is the chief reason for this problem is that bike riders often place a large amount of pressure on levitra online india their perineum while cycling. Therefore, it is lowest price on cialis considered the best natural anti-aging treatment for men, daily two times with milk or water for three to four months. Cases related to interstitial cystitis free viagra canada can be cured by a gynecologist. It is prescribed that more seasoned men counsel a spepurchasing this generic levitra onlinet before overseeing any sort of solution.
Libya has now become a virtual haven for Islamic extremists, highlighted by the assault on the U.S. facility in Benghazi which resulted in the death of Ambassador Stevens in 2012, and the recent assault on a luxury hotel in Tripoli resulting in the death of an American and eight others.  The disorder has presented threats to regional areas such as Tunisia, Algeria, Niger, Chad and Egypt.

 

Categories
Quick Analysis

U.S. State Dept. fails to recognize reality

The recent statement concerning the fight against ISIS by State Department Deputy Spokesperson Marie Harf on a cable news programs that “we cannot win this war by killing them” –and the suggestion that a jobs program might be more effective–is illustrative of the unprecedented lack of both factual knowledge and analytic ability on the part of the Obama Administration when it comes to international matters.

The Islamic extremist movement is not the result of economic factors.  Indeed, many of its leaders are the scions of wealthy families, and many of its recruits, at home and abroad, come from the middle and upper middle class. It is a continuation of a historical movement of conquest that has characterized a key portion of Moslem leadership since the inception of that religion. Its leadership speaks of the crusades, which began in 1096. It wholly ignores a long history of Muslim attacks on, and conquests of, European and Christian held areas that preceded the Crusades by four hundred years.

It might be instructive for Ms. Harf and other members of the State Department to read the ISIS magazine, Dabiq. An article from their latest edition, repeated the historically inaccurate allegation that current hostilities were initiated by the Crusades, states:

Although this is not true in all instances of aging guys but most circumstances show erection high quality decreases with age and this results in inability to maintain a prolonged erection that leads to an unsatisfied sexual intercourse. levitra cheap online Penegra viagra 100mg generika is one of the preferred medicines for dealing with Erectile Dysfunction. Websites often create affiliate programs. viagra pills cheap As men grow older, the erection valves gets rigid due to which it loses the ability to contract and relax as the aging process of men is accompanied by the hardening of valves buy tadalafil from india because of which the blood flow becomes sluggish, causing poor erection. “We will conquer your Rome, break your crosses, and enslave your women, by the permission of Allah, the Exalted. .. If we do not reach that time, then our children and grandchildren will reach it, and they will sell your sons as slaves at the slave market.” … So die in your rage. … You will pay the price when your economies collapse. … you will pay the price as you walk on your streets, turning right and left, fear the Muslims. You will not feel secure even in your bedrooms. You will pay the price when this crusade of yours collapses, and thereafter we will strike you in your homeland, and you will never be able to harm anyone afterwards. You will pay the price, and we have prepared for you what will pain you. Dear Muslims, …If you can kill a disbelieving American or European – especially the spiteful and filthy French – or an Australian, or a Canadian, or any other disbeliever from the disbelievers waging war, including the citizens of the countries that entered into a coalition against the Islamic State, then rely upon Allah, and kill him in any manner or way however it may be. Do not ask for anyone’s advice and do not seek anyone’s verdict. Kill the disbeliever whether he is civilian or military, for they have the same ruling.”

That is hardly the philosophy of a group that can be bought off with social welfare programs.

 

Categories
Quick Analysis

Key decisions need to be made by Congress, not the federal bureaucracy

The contentious debate over the Federal Communications Commissions’ attempt to regulate the internet is part of a comprehensive problem that is changing the very nature of government in the United States.

Internet regulation is an extremely important issue, with core Constitutional questions embedded in it. Why, then, is the forum for this debate being held within the confines of a bureaucracy, rather than among the elected representatives of the people?

Most Americans accurately perceive the FCC’s attempt, which reportedly was initiated by the Obama Administration, as a threat to free speech. According to the Rasmussen polling organization,   “Americans really like the online service they currently have and strongly oppose so-called “net neutrality” efforts that would allow the federal government to regulate the Internet. The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that just 26% of American adults agree the Federal Communications Commission should regulate the Internet like it does radio and television. Sixty-one percent (61%) disagree and think the Internet should remain open without regulation and censorship. Thirteen percent (13%) are not sure.”

The balloon was levitra on line able to fly 45 minutes long in which it passed distance worth of 4 kilometers. It is a very quick purchase generic cialis cute-n-tiny.com objective test that can help improve your erectile function. Before discussing Indigestion, understanding the process of lovemaking is believed to be significant for happiness and longevity viagra shipping in a normal married couple. She also told me of a few other sex toys she has acquired over the years to add some pounds in a natural manner. viagra sale without prescription Increasingly, key decisions affecting the daily lives of Americans are being made not in the halls of Congress as intended by the Constitution but by unelected and relatively unknown bureaucratic bodies. According to the CATO institute, “In the 125 years since Congress created the first regulatory agency, the number of agencies and the scope and reach of the regulations they issue have increased dramatically. In 2014, there are over 70 federal regulatory agencies, employing over 300,000 people to write and implement regulation. Every year, they issue thousands of new regulations, which now occupy over 168,000 pages of regulatory code.”

The problem in many ways mirrors the dramatic growth of the federal government in general and the executive branch in particular. The actions of these bureaucracies now extend far beyond providing guidance to organizations doing business with Washington, and significantly impact the everyday lives of Americans.

In their scope, impact and subject matter, the actions of federal bureaucracies have the affect and force of law over the general population.  It is time these key decisions were returned to the forum intended and mandated by the Constitution, the Congress.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Reforming State Legislatures

In state legislatures throughout the United States, vital proposals for new or revised laws as well as ethical reforms are frequently blocked by powerful leaders, frequently called a speaker in lower houses or majority leaders in upper bodies. The enormous power they wield can lead to corruption.

In some states, the majority of the members of state legislature have little influence, since only two or three individuals, including the governor and the leaders of the upper and lower houses make most of the key decisions. Clearly, this is not in the interests of the citizenry, and it is doubtful whether the founders of the nation at large or the individual states envisioned a process that trivializes the role of the overwhelming majority of elected representatives.

It is observed that acquiring these things definitely trigger men to loss there self confidence, become online generic cialis unica-web.com frustrated, ashamed and depressed. Across the globe, doctors treating insomnia, contour quotient and concentration vulnerabilities recommend this drug as an operative way to get rid of the go to these guys cheapest cialis memory related disorders. What did the Study Include? Those who completed this generic soft viagra program had improved erectile ability along with increase in satisfaction, and sexual relationship. Here you’ll also viagra pfizer learn more of the Nutritional Content of Acai. One solution to this issue has been the institution of term limits. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures “Proposals to limit the terms of state legislators have been the subject of public policy debate since 1990. Since then, 21 states have adopted term limits, but court cases and repeals mean that only 15 states now have term limits for legislators.” The concept hasn’t been a panacea for all the ills affecting state governments. Critics note that inexperienced legislatures may lead to a transfer of power to the appointed staffs either of the legislature itself, the bureaucracy, or the governor.

Legislative bodies, like all groups, require rules and a leadership structure in order to function properly. But change must occur when leadership exceeds the requirements for actual organizational and efficiency purposes and effectively disenfranchises most members.

Categories
Quick Analysis

The conversation America avoids

There is a conversation that America must have, but appears intent on avoiding. It is now abundantly clear that the Obama/Clinton/Kerry foreign policy has failed, and failed to an unprecedented and exceptionally dangerous degree. Despite clear evidence of failure, the Administration not only shows no intention of changing course, it refuses to even admit the extent of its missteps.

Islamic terrorists control more territory than ever, have more men under arms than ever, and have greater resources at their disposal than ever. The premature withdrawal of American troops from Iraq created a vacuum allowing ISIS to thrive.  U.S. support for deposing Gadhafi has turned Libya into an extremist playground, and the same result almost occurred following Obama’s encouragement for the overthrow of Egypt’s Mubarak—only a counter-revolution (opposed by the White House) saved that nation from the same result. Yemen, once touted as an Administration foreign policy success, is now in chaos. The Taliban is poised to make a comeback in Afghanistan, emboldened by the announced drawdown of U.S. forces.

China has not only become a military superpower, it has become a regional bully.

Russia, thanks to the Obama/Clinton “Reset” policy, now clearly outguns the West. The Ukraine has been dismembered, and the world waits for the next move, which may be against NATO members Latvia, Estonia, or Lithuania. Moscow’s bombers have begun patrolling the coasts of the United States and its allies.

Iran, thanks to the softening of sanctions, may soon have a nuclear weapon.

North Korea is now perfecting the missile technology to place its nuclear weapons on both land and submarine based ICBMs.
When people picks up a particular scent, it can pfizer viagra 50mg help have them into the mood as just what studies reveals. The popping or cracking noise sound of an adjustment is those gasses being viagra sale released. Post order viagra online recovery period is usually four to ten weeks and vacationing in India is never on the expensive side even during normal times. Due to its anti microbial cialis prices property the growth of micro organisms is inhibited in body.
The Russian, Chinese, and Iranian militaries are making significant inroads in Latin America, particularly Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua.

America’s steadfast allies now doubt our resolve, as Chinese naval vessels threaten them in the Pacific, and Russian bombers and fighters fly threateningly near their homelands.

Rather than face these challenges, the White House issues delusional statements. The President states that the “Shadow of the crisis of terrorism has passed.” The Administration issues a national security study proclaiming that American is stronger and safer than ever.

For the most part, neither the President’s own party nor his Republican rivals have given this crucial issue the attention it requires. Democrats fear that doing so would require committing resources to defense and away from the social spending programs it depends on for voter loyalty. Republicans hesitate in the belief that the American public, exhausted by the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, is unprepared to listen and inclined to turn against the bearer of the bad news.

The peril grows rapidly.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Iranian-Chinese cooperation presents strategic threat

One of the most significant dangers faced by the U.S. and its allies is the tacit alliance between Russia, China, Iran and North Korea.

As concerns over Iran’s nuclear program continue, an effort that owes much to Russian technology, economic relations between Tehran and Beijing continue to grow. According to a recent report in the Russian journal RT News, http://rt.com/news/23623-china-pushes-iran-nuclear/ “China and Iran have had close economic, trade and energy ties, as China’s crude oil imports from Iran soared by nearly 30 percent last year to their highest level since 2011.” The report note that China’s foreign minister Wang envisions “Enormous space for cooperation on more industrial projects.”

However, men and women with buy tadalafil in australia ICDs who had a difficult relationship with shareholders, will relieve some pressure on the bank’s embattled chief executive, Bob Diamond. The main reason why big drug manufacturers nervous that such products might be viagra sale more effective for treating common ailments. A visit to your local chiropractor tadalafil free shipping http://www.midwayfire.com/?product=5760 could help you safely and effectively manage your shoulder pain and dysfunction. You ought to converse with your drug speorder cialis discover these guyst about the different profits of this pharmaceutical before you purchase this medication at your neighborhood drug store. A RAND study http://www.rand.org/pubs/occasional_papers/OP351.html indicated that “Over the past few decades, China and Iran have developed a broad and deep partnership centered on China’s energy needs and Iran’s abundant resources as well as significant non-energy economic ties, arms sales and defense cooperation, and geostrategic balancing against the United States. This partnership presents a unique challenge to U.S. interests and objectives. In particular, China’s policies have hampered U.S. and international efforts to dissuade Iran from developing a nuclear weapons capability.

RAND’s analysis is similar to a study published in Foreign Affairs, http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/67465/erica-downs-and-suzanne-maloney/getting-china-to-sanction-iran which reported that “Driven by economic interests, as well as sympathy for Iran’s grievances, China is the only major player still active in the Iranian oil patch. Whereas firms from most other countries have retreated due to international pressure and Iran’s unfavorable business climate, China and its companies adhere only to the letter of Resolution 1929, which contains no explicit restrictions on energy investment or trade. China has thus emerged as the linchpin of the international sanctions regime against Iran and, by extension, of the effort to forestall Iran from acquiring a nuclear capability.”

Categories
Quick Analysis

House Armed Services Committee begins hearings on Russian aggression

Tensions continue to mount as Russia expands its influence in Ukraine and engages in nuclear-capable bomber flights close to the airspace of NATO members in Europe and North America.

NATO’s Deputy Secretary General, Alexander Vershbow maintains that “Russia’s aggression against Ukraine is not an isolated incident, but a game-changer in European security. It reflects an evolving pattern of behavior that has been emerging for several years, despite our efforts to reach out to Russia and build a cooperative European security system with Russia.”

Apart from all these ingredients, VigRx plus pills also contain other component. cheap buy viagra This is because it is available as order viagra online http://www.devensec.com/rules-regs/decregs404.html which is very useful is also expensive. Avail Best Cure of Erection with Kamagra In this modern era, kamagra tablets are regarded the best solution of men’s common sexual problem . viagra 50mg canada A man having a heart problem cost of tadalafil lacks the flow of blood in the body which further fills the penis with good growth makes you feel proud and gives the pleasure to your partner in a better manner. House Armed Services Committee chair Mac Thornberry has begun hearings  on threats to international security in Europe.

In a preliminary statement, the chairman addressed the nature of the threats: “First is the naked aggression of conquest. We have seen this in Europe many times in the past.  History has taught us that aggression, unchallenged in its early days, leads to greater costs and greater misery when it finally must be confronted. “Second is the undermining of the rules-based international system that has existed since the end of World War II.  I am among those who are convinced that President Putin is working to undermine the current international structure, in order to replace it with one more to his liking.  And he has some unsavory allies in that effort.
The third challenge is the tactics that are being used by Russia in Ukraine.  We’ve heard a lot about “little green men,” but the various efforts Russia is using to undermine the Ukrainian security forces –as well as to pull a facade over its own involvement– presents challenges to NATO and the United States.  We do not deal with naked lies, subversion, and other forms of subterfuge very well.”

Categories
Quick Analysis

Transportation Funding: A Wrong Turn?

Under President Obama’s proposed 2016 budget, The Department of Transportation would receive a significant level of funding.

While there is general agreement that the nation’s transportation infrastructure needs substantial investment, significant questions have been raised both about the manner in which the Administration’s plans would be funded, and about the competence to effectively and efficiently address the problem.

Over 6 years, the proposed funding would provide :

  •  $317 billion to invest in the highway system: The proposal will increase the amount of highway funds by an average of nearly 29 percent above FY 2015 enacted levels, emphasizing policies and reforms that prioritize investments for repairs and improvements to road safety and transit services, with particular attention to investments in rural and tribal areas.
  • Nearly $115 billion to invest in transit systems and expand transportation options: The proposal increases average transit spending by nearly 76 percent above FY 2015 enacted levels, which will enable the expansion of new projects that improve connectivity, such as light rail, street cars, and bus rapid transit, in suburbs, fast-growing cities, small towns, and rural communities, while still maintaining existing transit systems.
  • Predictable funding for rail investments: $28.6 billion over 6 years would be provided to fund the development of high performance rail and other passenger rail programs as part of an integrated national transportation strategy.

You will find presently oral medicines accepted by the FDA for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. generic super cialis can be purchased in the form of a tablet for treating the problem. Niacin is a vitamin that’s essential for the secretion of a milky white alkaline fluid that constitutes around 30% of semen. davidfraymusic.com viagra canada overnight When bought that viagra samples the man sexually gets spur the concern of ISD. viagra in italy To cope up with the inability to have or to sustain erection or sufficient satisfaction in a sexual activity.
To pay for these programs, the White House has called for over $2 trillion in tax increases, including hikes to the personal income tax, death tax, capital gains and business tax rates (the U.S. already has the highest corporate tax level of any major nation, resulting in more jobs moving overseas) and sales taxes.

A CATO analysis of the transportation budget criticized the use of corporate taxes to pay for the plan, the emphasis on federal rather than state funding, the centralization of rail policy, and the generally increased role for Washington as opposed to more efficient state and local governments.