Category: Quick Analysis

Categories
Quick Analysis

Obama’s Iran Deception: Does it Apply to his Entire Foreign Policy?

The Obama Administration is nearing the conclusion of its final term, and the rationale behind its foreign policy choices remains a mystery.

There is little doubt that it has (apparently) blundered its way into some of the worst international relations mistakes any White House has ever made, including the failed “Reset” with Russia, the inability to deal with (or, for a time, even recognize) the rise of extremism in the Middle East, the alienation of key allies, and its diplomatic passivity in the face of Chinese aggression. Throughout all of its global missteps, there has been one constant: its refusal to explain its goals or even its core beliefs.

Nowhere is this more apparent than in its actions towards Iran.

The latest example is another startling departure from common sense. Despite the Tehran government’s continuous provocations and hostile acts, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry is encouraging European enterprises to do business with Iran. It remains unclear why a U.S. official would engage in any activities for the benefit of another government, particularly one with a record of hostility towards America.

In remarks to the press before attending an anti-corruption summit in London reported by the Wall Street Journal, Kerry bizarrely stated that European business executives shouldn’t use the excuse of poor U.S.-Iranian relations as a reason not to do business with Iran. There has been no explanation why an American Secretary of State should have any involvement in business relations between private concerns and a foreign government, let alone one with a pronounced animosity towards the U.S.

The comments come at roughly the same time that remarks by White House deputy national security adviser for strategic communications Ben Rhodes have created a firestorm of controversy. Rhodes indicates that the Administration essentially misled the American people about the Iran nuclear agreement.

A New York Times description  of how the Iran deal was “sold” to the American public by Rhodes notes: “The way in which most Americans have heard the story of the Iran deal presented — that the Obama administration began seriously engaging with Iranian officials in 2013 in order to take advantage of a new political reality in Iran, which came about because of elections that brought moderates to power in that country — was largely manufactured for the purpose for selling the deal. Even where the particulars of that story are true, the implications that readers and viewers are encouraged to take away from those particulars are often misleading or false.”
Both of the medicine contains in stock cialis sale sildenafil citrate and work the same way to relieve the condition of a sufferer. Women around the buying levitra online Full Article world say that getting pregnant is made easier with this pregnancy system. The cialis generico uk inhibitor (PDE-5) quickly combines with blood and organ can have a physical appearance of rigidity. It cleanses blood off its toxins so that the blood reaching the destined organs is purufied. levitra consultation
The White House lied—there is no gentler way of stating this—about a “moderate” faction in the Tehran regime. It lied about the fact that President Obama had a long-standing desire to conclude a deal that would lift the economic sanctions on Iran.

Even news outlets normally favorable towards the White House have criticized the Administration’s Iran deception. The NY Daily News, a very pro-Administration outlet, editorialized: “Iranian propaganda went as the mullahs hoped for relief from economic sanctions via a nuclear deal with the U.S. and Western powers. Why would anyone believe such obvious nonsense? One reason — in fact the key reason — is that Obama joined Iran in knowingly peddling the same false propaganda to America”

The White House has also glossed over the fact that the inspection regime was going to be inadequate, and that Iran would be free to develop nuclear weapons in about a decade. Since the deal was completed, Iran’s supposedly forbidden testing of extended range missiles has proceeded unchallenged.

According to The Hill, House oversight chairman Jason Chaffetz is threatening to subpoena Rhodes.

Despite the lessening of economic sanctions and the refusal by the White House to respond to Iranian missile test violations, Tehran continues to expand its aggressive actions. According to Israel National News  Iran is threatening U.S. warships in the Persian Gulf.

The Iran deception is just a part of the Obama Administration’s foreign policy puzzle. Is this White House extremely unlucky, or just wholly unskilled in international matters? Is the President blinded by the hard-left ideology that has nurtured his career? Most worrisomely, particularly in light of the Iran deception, it is now appropriate to ask whether these results, In Russia, Asia, the Middle East and elsewhere are actually the results Mr. Obama hoped for, a product of a worldview so alien from that favored and expected by the vast majority of Americans that the President dare not reveal his true goals.

Categories
Quick Analysis

American Revolution Finally Receives Attention

The New York Analysis of Policy & Government has frequently expressed concern regarding the lack of education in the proud history of the United States. In particular, the extraordinary sacrifices and the profound ideals that led to America’s creation have not been adequately taught to the youth of the nation. It was, then, greatly satisfying to learn that an institution dedicated to the American Revolution was in the process of being formed. We asked the staff of the Museum of the American Revolution to describe their institution. They prepared this exclusive article in response.

 Nearly a century in the making, the Museum of the American Revolution will open to the public in spring 2017 in the heart of historic Philadelphia – the headquarters of the American Revolution.

The Museum experience takes visitors on a chronological journey from the roots of conflict in the 1760s to the rise of armed resistance, and from the bold Declaration of Independence of 1776 through the long years of warfare that achieved victory. The exhibits also examine the challenges of creating a new nation and the Revolution’s enduring legacy for people around the globe.

Through the Museum’s distinguished collection of original historic artifacts, visitors will have the opportunity to will explore and engage with the remarkable story of the American Revolution. One of the premier collections of its kind, it includes several thousand objects that span the scope of the Revolutionary War, from General Washington’s Headquarters Tent and a number of his personal belongings, to an impressive assortment of period weaponry, soldiers’ and civilians’ personal accoutrements, fine art, and printed works and manuscripts.

The collection began more than a century ago when a history-minded minister in Valley Forge raised funds from around the nation to purchase the original tent that George Washington used as his command center during the Revolution. It was the beginning of a rich and diverse collection that continues to grow. These treasures are now in storage, waiting for a permanent home within the Museum.

In addition to original artifacts, the Museum will use immersive galleries, dynamic theaters and large-scale tableaux to bring to life the events, people, and ideals of the founding of the United States and inspire a deep appreciation of the importance of the struggle that created American democracy.

Immersive experiences include a gallery featuring a full-scale replica of Boston’s Liberty Tree, where the first stirrings of revolt were discussed and debated; the recreation of an Oneida Indian council house, where the tribe’s leaders made their decision to join the American cause; the Battlefield Theater, where visitors will experience the sensation of being on the Continental Army’s front line of battle, facing a British assault; a recreation of Independence Hall in disarray during a British occupation in Philadelphia; and a large model of an 18th-century privateer ship that visitors can board.
It has helped over 80% of men with erectile dysfunction, which is one of the major cialis on line issues pertaining to impotence in men. The sesame oil can cialis cipla be used in dry skin conditions. To end the pain, some bullied children and teens have tragically chosen to end their lives. female viagra 100mg Apart from improving the physical health of person, regular intake of safed musli extract in diet schedule also helps in reducing the flow of returning blood out of the penis making it hard cialis generic uk and erect and ready to be erect after penetration.
A dedicated theater will house General Washington’s Headquarters Tent – one of the most iconic surviving artifacts of the Revolution – which served as both his office and his sleeping quarters throughout much of the war. It was within the folds of this tent that decisions were made that changed the course of history. The tent will be presented as part of a multimedia presentation exploring Washington’s leadership.

Whether stepping into an Oneida Indian council house, or examining the 1773 volume “Poems on Various Subjects” by Phyllis Wheatley, America’s first published black female poet, museum visitors will appreciate the diversity of people and opinion that contributed to America’s founding.

The culminating museum experience will be the Legacy Theater, where visitors are invited to reflect on their new understanding of the struggle to create the first modern democracy, and the ongoing responsibility to perpetuate the ideals of America’s original “greatest generation.”

The Museum, now nearing completion, rises three stories above the street, encompassing 118,000 total square feet of permanent and temporary exhibit galleries, theaters, education spaces, collection storage, a café, a retail store, offices, and a welcoming lobby. The internationally recognized firm of Robert A.M. Stern Architects created a landmark design for the state-of-the-art facility in a style that reflect and honors the rich history of the neighborhood.

Located just steps away from Independence Hall, Carpenters’ Hall, Franklin Court, and the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier of the Revolution, the Museum will serve as a portal to the region’s many Revolutionary sites, sparking interest, providing context, and encouraging exploration. It will enrich the existing heritage community and make Philadelphia the most engaging and authentic destination for those interested in discovering America’s founding.

The Museum is a private, non-partisan, and non-profit organization. Group tickets are now available and can be purchased by calling 267-858-3308. Individual tickets will be available in January 2017. For more information about the Museum, or to join the mailing list, visit www.AmRevMuseum.org or call toll-free 877-740-1776.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Administration Fails in Bid to Ignore Constitutional Separation of Powers

Will the Courts finally begin enforcing the Constitution against a President who has sought to ignore it?

The ruling by United States District Court Judge Rosemary Collyer in the case United States House of Representatives v. Sylvia Mathews Burwell  stated that the Obama Administration unconstitutionally sought to spend money to subsidize health insurers under the Affordable Care Act. The amount in question—estimated to be upwards of  $175 billion throughout the next ten years, is enormous, but the ruling (The effects of which have been delayed pending an appeal)  has consequences beyond the immediate legal issue at hand.

From the time that the Democrat Party first lost control of the House of Representatives during Obama’s tenure, the President has run roughshod over the mandatary separation of powers in America’s fundamental law. He was not shy about his contempt for the Constitution, declaring that he “could not wait for Congress to act” and that he had “a pen and a phone” and knew how to use them.

While Congress was not as aggressive as it could, or indeed should, have been concerning past abuses of power by the current Administration, the act of spending money without the approval of Congress was a step too far.  Indeed, if the White House gained this authority, combined with the President’s overreaching Executive Orders and the use of the federal bureaucracy to enact regulations that should realistically have been legislative items, the entire reason for the existence of the legislative branch would have been dismantled.  The United States government would resemble one man rule—essentially, an elected dictatorship.

The Constitution is clear on the issue, plainly stating in Article 1, Section 9 that “No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law,” and only the legislative branch has the authority to initiate such a law.  Congress explicitly did not do so in this case, yet Obama has spent and is prepared to spend further funds anyway.

 
The sequence includes nerve impulses in the spinal column, curve around and are joined at the front of the chest area. cialis generika 5mg I have no doubt to india levitra recommend VigRX Plus to anyone who looking for better erection, sexual desire, orgasm quality and improving overall sexual health and performance. This gentle thrusting rapidly stretches soft tissue and stimulates the nervous system sildenafil best price to return normal motion to the spine. Kamagra is formulated with sildenafil citrate the basic component that works by relieving the discount levitra amerikabulteni.com penile muscles relax and the blood flow enhances.
The Administration, perhaps realizing that it had usurped Congressional authority, sought to prevent the case from proceeding forward by contending that the legislative branch lacked standing to sue. However, in a ruling handed down on September 9, 2015, the Court declared that Congress did indeed have the right to enforce its Constitutional privileges in a legal action.

 

In its decision the Court noted that “Article I of the United States Constitution established the Congress, which comprises a House of Representatives and a Senate. U.S. Const. art. I, § 1. Only these two bodies, acting together, can pass laws—including the laws necessary to spend public money. In this respect, Article I is very clear: ‘No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law . . . .’ U.S. Const. art. I, § 9, cl. 7. Through this lawsuit, the House of Representatives complains that Sylvia Burwell, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, Jacob Lew, the Secretary of the Treasury, and their respective departments (collectively the Secretaries) have spent billions of unappropriated dollars to support the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. The House further alleges that Secretary Lew and Treasury have, under the guise of implementing regulations, effectively amended the Affordable Care Act’s employer mandate by delaying its effect and narrowing its scope… The House sues, as an institutional plaintiff, to preserve its power of the purse and to maintain constitutional equilibrium between the Executive and the Legislature. If its non-appropriation claims have merit, which the Secretaries deny, the House has been injured in a concrete and particular way that is traceable to the Secretaries and remediable in court. The Court concludes that the House has standing to pursue those constitutional claims.”

It is truly chilling to realize how far from the Constitution this Administration has strayed, and how little opposition it has encountered as it violated one clause after another.  It has repeatedly enacted vast and broad changes to the U.S. economy that could only legally be enacted by legislation, yet were accomplished through executive orders and bureaucratic regulation.  It has entered into substantial treaties with foreign governments, but has prevented the Senate from voting on them as constitutionally mandated by simply labelling them as “agreements.” It has endangered a key portion of free speech rights by simply surrendering control of the internet to an international body comprised of many members that believe in censorship.

In two key legacy areas of the Obama Administration, the nuclear deal with Iran and the Affordable Care Act, members of the White House have actually bragged that they lied to Congress and the American people in order to achieve goals. A quiescent and biased media has failed to cover dissent over these outrages, and federal agencies under the control of the President have actively sought to unlawfully suppress dissent, the IRS being a prime example.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Wrong Decisions from White House Harm Middle Class and U.S. Economy

The U.S. Economy is severely mismanaged, and the impact is being felt most sharply by the middle class.  From high taxes which drive employers to move overseas, to the diversion of funds from crucial needs to nonessential programs, Washington has steered America in the wrong direction.

The U.S. Treasury reports that the federal debt as of May 10 had reached $19,204,514,007,221.38. CNS notes that this catastrophic figure exists despite the fact that FY2016 Taxes set a record through April– $12,679 Per Worker!  Revenue isn’t the problem. Government spending on the wrong priorities is.

Not to be overlooked in the factors affecting the economy is the White House’s environmental policies, emplaced without the consent of Congress. For example, Hot Air  reports that there is “visceral disgust” for Obama’s environmental policies in the Appalachian counties… West Virginia…energy costs are expected to go up 40 percent under Obama’s Clean Power Plan (CPP), which sets to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 32 percent by 2030 from 2005 levels. It’s a regulatory nightmare, a job killer, and a policy that Hillary Clinton plans to continue if she’s elected.”

The Stratfor intelligence organization reported in 2013: “The threat to the United States is the persistent decline in the middle class’ standard of living, a problem that is reshaping the social order that has been in place since World War II and that, if it continues, poses a threat to American power… In the 1950s and 1960s, the median income allowed you to live with a single earner — normally the husband, with the wife typically working as homemaker — and roughly three children. It permitted the purchase of modest tract housing, one late model car and an older one. It allowed a driving vacation somewhere and, with care, some savings as well…  Government programs frequently fail to fulfill even minimal intentions while squandering scarce resources…”

A just released report from the Pew Research Center  reveals that “The American middle class is losing ground in metropolitan areas across the country, affecting communities from Boston to Seattle and from Dallas to Milwaukee. From 2000 to 2014 the share of adults living in middle-income households fell in 203 of the 229 U.S. metropolitan areas examined in a new Pew Research Center analysis of government data. The decrease in the middle-class share was often substantial, measuring 6 percentage points or more in 53 metropolitan areas, compared with a 4-point drop nationally.
Apart from these, men who are taking these generic drugs more frequently, do not know that they are reducing viagra 50mg canada their chances of obtaining natural erections. Chiropractic is usually a life-style along ordine cialis on line Prices with a philosophy of residing. Yet, because Republican John McCain won the state, their votes were not buy uk viagra even tabulated in the results. Take this medication orally with or without food, 30 minutes prior cialis lowest price to the physical intimate sessions / activities.
“The shrinking of the middle class at the national level, to the point where it may no longer be the economic majority in the U.S., was documented in an earlier analysis by the Pew Research Center. The changes at the metropolitan level, the subject of this in-depth look at the American middle class, demonstrate that the national trend is the result of widespread declines in localities all around the country.”

The reason for the recent decline of the U.S. middle class and the general weakness in the U.S. economy is not the result of a cyclical downturn in business, or the bursting of a bubble.  It is not a reflection of the 2007—2009 recession.  It is the specific result of federal tax and spending practices which ignore the needs of the private sector, and redirects federal dollars away from essential needs such as economic growth, defense and infrastructure and towards entitlements (but NOT Social Security of Medicare.)

In the 1950s, Washington spent significantly on infrastructure, building the interstate highway system. The nation prospered. In the 1980s, President Reagan spent vast sums on the military, and the economy grew stronger. Just as it did in the period before World War II, the dollars spent on defense provided jobs—middle class jobs. The shrinking of programs to build badly needed replacement weapons for the aging equipment in the armed forces depresses the economy, and the shrinking manpower of the military increases unemployment.

The huge increase in entitlements (such as the 41% increase in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) drains funds from essential needs and provides a drag on economic growth.  If, instead of spending more on entitlements, the Obama Administration had lowered taxes and cut back on regulations, business would have expanded, more jobs would have been created, and the resulting growth would have strengthened the economy.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Facebook Accused of Biased News Coverage

On May 4, the New York Analysis of Policy and Government questioned whether popular social media sites tilted their news coverage in favor of left wing points of view. We worried that attempts to expand into the lucrative Chinese market, for example, by Facebook would enhance that problem.

On May 10, U.S. Senator John Thune (R-S.D.), chairman of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, asked Facebook Chairman and CEO Mark Zuckerberg to answer questions following reports that company employees actively suppressed news stories on topics of interest to politically conservative users of the social media platform.

A statement by the Committee noted:

“Facebook must answer these serious allegations and hold those responsible to account if there has been political bias in the dissemination of trending news,’ said Thune on sending the letter. ‘Any attempt by a neutral and inclusive social media platform to censor or manipulate political discussion is an abuse of trust and inconsistent with the values of an open Internet.’

“On May 9, a story in Gizmodo reported allegations by several former unnamed Facebook employees that the company routinely worked to suppress conservative viewpoints on the social network and artificially highlighted other news stories even when objective metrics did not indicate they were ‘trending.”

Thune’s letter asks Zuckerberg to provide answers to the following questions no later than May 24:

“1)    Please describe Facebook’s organizational structure for the Trending Topics feature, and the steps for determining included topics.  Who is ultimately responsible for approving its content?

2)    Have Facebook news curators in fact manipulated the content of the Trending Topics section, either by targeting news stories related to conservative views for exclusion or by injecting non-trending content?

3)    What steps is Facebook taking to investigate claims of politically motivated manipulation of news stories in the Trending Topics section?  If such claims are substantiated, what steps will Facebook take to hold the responsible individuals accountable?

4)    In a statement responding to the allegations, Facebook has claimed to have “rigorous guidelines in place for the review team” to prevent “the suppression of political perspectives” or the “prioritization of one viewpoint over another or one news outlet over another.”
During your sessions of couple counseling San Francisco you can get help in understanding what is the standard? Many patients with chronic prostatitis often determined whether the disease had been cured by their own feelings. viagra generic discount Thus if you have been captured by this dysfunction whether by excessive stress or by hormone misbalance then you can be escaped and spared from the miseries by using this solution by beating impotency. pill viagra for sale For the men suffering from the erectile dysfunction, but also to enhance the quality of erection is 100% natural and achieved purchase cialis unica-web.com in just a few minutes of consumption. As the men ages he experience decline in the levels of hormones present in the pharmacy on line viagra human system.
a.    When did Facebook first introduce these guidelines?

  1.  Please provide a copy of these guidelines, as well as any changes or amendments since January 2014.
  2.  Does Facebook provide training for its employees related to these guidelines?  If so, describe what the training consists of, as well as its frequency.
  3.  How does Facebook determine compliance with these guidelines?  Does it conduct audits?  If so, how often? What steps are taken when a violation occurs?

    5)    Does Facebook maintain a record of curators’ decisions to inject a story into the Trending Topics section or target a story for removal?  If such a record is not maintained, can such decisions be reconstructed or determined based on an analysis of the Trending Topics product?

    a.    If so, how many stories have curators excluded that represented conservative viewpoints or topics of interest to conservatives?  How many stories did curators inject that were not, in fact, trending?

  4.  Please provide a list of all news stories removed from or injected into the Trending Topics section since January 2014.

The Senate Commerce Committee exercises legislative and oversight jurisdiction over issues related to Internet communications, consumer protection, and media issues.”

In his letter to Zuckerberg, Senator Thune stated “Social networks such as Facebook are an increasingly important source of news for many Americans and people around the world.  The ability to connect with others to discuss and debate the issues of the day that such services offer has created a powerful platform for civic engagement.  Indeed, with over a billion daily active users on average, Facebook has enormous influence on users’ perceptions of current events, including political perspectives. If Facebook presents its Trending Topics section as the result of a neutral, objective algorithm, but it is in fact subjective and filtered to support or suppress particular political viewpoints, Facebook’s assertion that it maintains a ‘platform for people and perspectives from s the political spectrum’ misleads the public.”

That, of course, is the central issue.  Facebook, as an independent company not run by government, is free to present whatever viewpoint it so chooses, and should be able to do so without restriction.  However, if it solicits participation from the public based in part upon assertions that it provides nonbiased coverage of the news, then it has intentionally misled those who utilize the service.

The New York Analysis of Policy and Government is highly critical of attempts to rein in free speech in the political or any other arena. However, we find it deeply hypocritical that leftist/progressive activists continue to criticize expressions of centrist and conservative thought and seek to regulate it through campaign finance restrictions, in addition to the various attempts by the Obama Administration to oversee media activities. Meanwhile, actions such as that Facebook is accused of and which many other outlets in print and television media engage in which are clearly biased towards the left end of the spectrum go un-criticized.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Middle Class Jobs Continue to Lag

Nonfarm payroll employment gains were 160,000 in April according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, a drop of 40,000 from the prior three month average. Job gains occurred in professional and business services, health care, and financial activities, while mining employment continued to decline.

The reason for the decline in the U.S. economy and the continuing problem in the American balance of trade can be gleaned from delving into the areas that continue to be the weakest. Manufacturing employment changed little in April (+4,000), after losing 45,000 jobs over the prior 2 months. Mining employment continued to decline in April (-7,000). The industry has lost 191,000 jobs since a recent peak in September 2014. More than three-fourths of the job losses over this period have been in support activities for mining.

Middle income jobs are suffering. A jobs market that is based on health care, retail, and consulting services produces little that can be exported.

While the White House continues to tout an unemployment rate of 5%, the reality is far different.  The number is made artificially low by the declining number of Americans in the workforce (a four decade low) and it fails to reflect that a substantial number of jobs created are low-paying or part time positions that replace full time, lost middle income jobs. Additionally, a worrisome large number of the unemployed, 25.7%, have been unemployed for a prolonged period.

Among the employed, the number working part time for economic reasons, also referred to as involuntary part-time workers, was 6.0 million in April. This measure has shown little movement since November. (Involuntary part-time workers are those who would have preferred full-time employment but were working part time because their hours had been cut back or because they were unable to find full-time work.)

Reuters reports that “Manufacturing’s job problem undercuts hopeful forecasts that U.S. companies would bring significant numbers of jobs back from overseas. That’s simply not happening to a degree sufficient to offset the continuing exodus of work and suggest deeper problems roiling factory floors…The slowdown in oil and gas has radiated deep into the economy and huge cuts by heavy equipment and farm machinery manufacturers are battering thousands of smaller suppliers across the industrial belt….the downturn has spread gloom across the U.S. industrial heartland…many Midwest manufacturers say they are as disillusioned with Washington’s view of the economy as their hourly workers.”
Learn more significant order cheap viagra points about this medicine then do not panic as you can refer the manual without any hesitation and doubts. The name of the following disorder that has shattered dreams of millions generic cialis from canada http://djpaulkom.tv/sim-djs-new-years-2012-mixes/ of men’s. Men, these days, take modern medicines buy viagra from india like Kamagra, Caverta, or Tadalis to overcome anxiety induced impotence. Men can have good relationships only if they keep their mates generic sildenafil india satisfied.
While manufacturing jobs had been declining for several decades, the dramatic downward slide can be traced to President Clinton’s allowing China off the hook from yearly reviews of its policies.

It is deeply frustrating that the current employment crisis in middle income jobs is not just  the temporary result of a cyclical downturn.  It is the direct result of the White House’s tax and environmental policies. Taxes for U.S. corporations are the highest in the developed world, which encourages companies to move their jobs overseas. The Obama Administration’s regulatory tidal wave, especially those designed to destroy the coal industry, have targeted not only a large number of jobs, but also some of the best paying middle income jobs in the economy.

CNS  notes that “Over the course of the 86 full months that President Barack Obama has completed serving in the White House—from February 2009 through March 2016–the U.S. Treasury has collected approximately $18,764,164,000,000 in tax revenues (in non-inflation-adjusted dollars), according to the Monthly Treasury Statements issued during that period…That equals approximately $124,003 for each of the 151,320,000 persons who, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, had either a full- or part-time job during March 2016. During the same 86-month stretch of the Obama presidency, the total debt of the federal government increased from $10,632,005,246,736.97 to $19,264,938,619,643.07, according to the Treasury. That is an increase in the debt of $8,632,933,372,906.10—or approximately $57,051 for each of the 151,320,000 people with jobs as of March.

HotAir reports that there is “visceral disgust” for Obama’s environmental policies in the Appalachian counties… West Virginia…energy costs are expected to go up 40 percent under Obama’s Clean Power Plan (CPP), which sets to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 32 percent by 2030 from 2005 levels. It’s a regulatory nightmare, a job killer, and a policy that Hillary Clinton plans to continue if she’s elected.”

Investors.com believes that Obama’s “policies have made it harder than ever for manufacturers to hire…New Environmental Protection Agency regulations to slash carbon emissions 30% by 2030 will have a devastating effect on factory jobs. A study by the Heritage Foundation found that this regulation by itself would cost each American $7,000 in income while killing 500,000 factory jobs and 45% of all coal-industry jobs. Then there’s the just-released ozone standards, also from the EPA’s job-killing policy shop. A study by NERA Economic Consulting for the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) estimated a $140 billion hit to GDP and as many as 1.4 million jobs lost each year. Since Obama took office, thousands of new regulations have gone into effect. In 2012, regulation cost the U.S. economy about $2 trillion, or 12% of GDP. And manufacturers have been hit hardest. The average factory today spends $19,564 per worker to comply with regulations. For small manufacturers, it’s bigger: $34,671 per worker.”

Categories
Quick Analysis

Russia’s Next Invasion

Another Russian invasion of an Eastern European nation is brewing, and this time the consequences will be enormous.

Moscow has combined the threat of overwhelming military force with economic and internal political pressure to pull Bulgaria into its orbit. Russian reconnaissance and transport planes are frequently flying on Bulgaria’s eastern border, straining the nation’s antiquated air defense systems. Sources also indicate that Russia has also attempted to gain dominance in Bulgaria by buying influence in local media.

Bulgaria is a member both of NATO and the European Union. By treaty, aggressive acts on one NATO member must be treated as an attack on all, including the United States.

Last fall, According to reports in the U.K.’s Independent,   Bulgaria’s President Rosen Plevneliev warned that after its invasion of the Ukraine, Russia was targeting Bulgaria.  “Russia has trained its sights on the Balkans to wage a ‘hybrid warfare’ campaign aimed at destabilising the whole of Europe.”  Plevneliev accused the Kremlin of launching “massive cyber attacks on Bulgaria’s government institutions and increasingly testing Bulgaria’s airspace…The very efficient and secure way for Russia to destabilise Europe is through the Balkans, so that is what Mr. Putin is focusing on,”

It contains Sildenafil Citrate which is utilized as a possible anti-hypertensive drug yet since it can successfully treat disorder, it really is being used as yet. online levitra prescription amerikabulteni.com Do not skip this step ever while you take this medicine, make sure your have asked prescription viagra buy online amerikabulteni.com form your doctor. Teenage is the time for experiments in life, it is the cheap generic viagra simplest way to get rid of the problem. Visit here: order viagra online amerikabulteni.com The life of today’s men is ruled by various adverse habits like drugs, alcohol, smoking, stress, poor diet, and much more. A Bulgarian defense document describes the nation’s security concerns about Russia:  “Hard to predict challenges, risks and threats to the national and global security are generated by the crisis in Ukraine and the development of the ‘hybrid war’; … the unsolved security problems in the Western Balkans; the frozen conflicts in the Black Sea region… In response to the deteriorating security environment NATO is increasing its Rapid Reaction Force to 40,000 troops. A brigade-strength very High Readiness Joint Task Force and enhancement of the Command and Control system with new elements is under way. Their reaction time is substantially reduced. New adequate measures will be taken in case of continued trends towards the increase in threats of asymmetric and hybrid activities adjacent to or on Allied territory. In this regard the Republic of Bulgaria is ready to contribute to the NATO Interim Very High Readiness Joint Task Force (VJTF) Capability/Solution…the conclusion is that there is a durable and long-term deterioration of the security environment in the immediate vicinity of the Eastern and the South-Eastern NATO flanks. The international order in Europe and the international relations principles of the inviolability of the legitimate international borders, the non-interference in internal affairs of other countries and the respect for the right of self-determination of the nations are now considerably undermined.”

Observers believe that this isn’t just an attack on one nation, but on the whole of Europe. The European Reform organization stressed: “It is time that we properly understand Russian activities in Bulgaria, especially in light of recent developments taking place in Ukraine, Syria, and a number of Eastern European countries. Using its old divide et impera tactics, Russia is challenging the unity among EU Member States by taking advantage of a number of different factors including economic links or support for political parties which have especially strong ties with Moscow (like Ataka in Bulgaria). It is time we look closer at Putin’s game, a big part of which is a conflict in the East of Ukraine, and react before it is too late.”

“If the Ukrainian conflict has taught us anything, it is that Russia has recently diverted much of its resources and focus from mobilising hard power in protecting its interests to soft power, including funding media outlets and political parties. This shift can be seen very clearly in Bulgaria which is suffering from Moscow’s harmful interferences.  In November 2006, Vladimir Chizhov, Moscow’s Ambassador to the EU, famously called Bulgaria ‘Russia’s would-be Trojan horse in the EU’. Although Bulgaria has long been regarded as the European country most vulnerable to Russian influence, there is no place for a passive reaction from the European side.”

Defense News reports that in response to the Russian threat, “The governments of Ukraine, Romania and Bulgaria are discussing plans to set up a joint military brigade, according to an announcement by Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko following a meeting with his Romanian counterpart, Klaus Iohannis, in Bucharest…The latest move by the three countries follows an earlier initiative by Ukraine, Poland and Lithuania to set up a joint military brigade, dubbed the Litpolukrbrig. The brigade will comprise about 4,000 troops, and it is expected to reach full combat readiness in 2017.”

Categories
Quick Analysis

Mayor de Blasio Wants Nationwide Influence, May First Have to Fight Ethics Charges

Why should anyone outside of the Big Apple even remotely care about a scandal involving horses (yes, horses) in New York City?

There is, indeed, a very good reason.  The city’s now beleaguered hard-left mayor, Bill de Blasio, who has sought to take a leadership position in the nationwide progressive movement, is thoroughly emblematic of the venality and hypocrisy of the extremist movement throughout the United States.

Mayor de Blasio has a personal history that is rather stunning, but apparently acceptable to his Progressive supporters.  At a time when the Soviet Union was, thanks to the Sandinista regime,  using Nicaragua as an anti-American forward base for its military, de Blasio was an ardent supporter of the Sandinistas. He violated federal law by spending his honeymoon in Cuba. How bad was the Sandinista regime so beloved by de Blasio?  Judicial Watch notes that “By 1983 there were about 20,000 political prisoners held in the Marxist regime’s jails, the highest number of political prisoners of any nation in the hemisphere with the exception of Fidel Castro’s communist Cuba.” A New York Times review quotes de Blasio as being an “advocate of democratic socialism.”

The central goal of the Progressive Movement is the centralization of power in a national government which they lead. Like extremist movements everywhere, they believe the ends justify the means. To amass power, they play the system, use Trojan horse issues, and ignore ethical rules.

During his 2013 campaign for Mayor, de Blasio weirdly decided to make an issue of the use of the famous horse-drawn carriages in and around Central Park, seeking to end the tradition so popular with tourist and locals alike.  He alleged that he was concerned with the welfare of the horses, but the argument was unconvincing, at best.  It was later discovered that a substantial donor wanted the land the horse stable was located on, but the owner wouldn’t sell. The Mayor then suggested using taxpayer dollars to build a new stable in Central Park. The animal rights group involved has now been subpoenaed.

The Mayor, according to reports, engaged in other similar schemes, masked by supposedly progressive causes, as a way gaining donations. Rather than go to further social causes, the funds were instead routed to like-minded progressive candidates.
Exercising regularly:- It is one of the buy viagra without consultation http://www.icks.org/html/04_publication.php?cate=FALL%2FWINTER+2004 best techniques for accomplishing otherworldly existence and illuminating the brain. But in the vast majority of http://icks.org/n/data/ijks/2019-2.pdf levitra 60 mg cases, it might be related to some medical causes such as hormonal problems, injury or side effects of some drugs. It is buy viagra sale also available in 100mg strength and enables men to attain and maintain powerful erections. This is done by pulling the ankle joint and maintain viagra cheap canada the amount of surface area to weight ratio.
Interestingly enough, it is Progressives who constantly advocate for tough campaign finance rules, but only when it applies to their opponents.  For decades, left-leaning organizations, many financed by public dollars, have funneled funds and assistance to candidates. However, should anyone on the opposing side do the same, excuses are found to restrict them. That is the reason Progressives have opposed the Citizens United decision so bitterly.

According to the New York Post the state Board of Elections has accused de Blasio of “willful and flagrant” violations of campaign finance laws,” the very same type of laws Progressives advocate to keep money out of politics (except, of course, dollars from left wing groups,  supportive unions, etc.)

Progressives are quick to criticize contributions from the Koch brothers, but turn a blind eye towards the enormous cash funneled from billionaires such as George Soros, (who has a highly questionable reputation) and Tom Speyer. De Blasio’s recent fundraiser for Hillary Clinton (He served as Clinton’s campaign manager for U.S. Senate) was composed, notes the NY Daily News of a “a who’s who of top lobbyists” who “served on the host committee of Bill de Blasio’s $1 million fund-raiser with Hillary Clinton.”

In addition to taking jobs away from carriage drivers and funding leftist candidates, de Blasio’s other passion apparently is criticizing cops. His verbal attacks on his own city’s police force, which most believe to be the most professional and unbiased in the nation, has been so severe that at one point officers mounted a work slow down of nonemergency activities in response. A National Review study notes that “public safety remains at risk from an activist mayor who sees his base as the anti-police Left.”

True to Progressive tactics, de Blasio has sought taxpayer funding for his partisan national political crusades using a variety of unconvincing excuses. Wherever you live in the USA, Mayor de Blasio, friend of the Castros and Sandinistas, wants to influence your local government.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Inappropriate Campaign Tactics

Presidential elections are generally hard fought, no-holds barred contests. However, several disturbing occurrences in the 2016 campaign have gone far beyond the usual rough and tumble of the quadrennial slugfest.

The initial salvo began even before the start of the campaign season, and has already been widely discussed. The inappropriate opposition of the Democrat Party to common-sense measures to insure the accuracy of voter registration rolls and to verify that only qualified voters actually cast ballots has been clearly documented.

Several new strategies have recently been added.

The GOP has generally been identified as tougher on crime, and in favor of more stringent sentencing. It follows, then, that those on the receiving end of that philosophy have not been favorably disposed towards Republican candidates. That has not placed the GOP at a disadvantage, since convicted felons, under current law in most states, have forfeited their right to vote as a consequence of their misdeeds.

In late April, Terry McAuliffe, Governor of the key swing state of Virginia and a personal friend of Hillary Clinton, announced that he was restoring voting rights of more than 200,000 Virginians who were convicted of felonies such as murder, rape, armed assault and other crimes.  Some analyses indicate that the governor’s restoration would be permitted despite the status of any unpaid fines or restitution requirements. A press release from McAuliffe’s office noted these ex-cons had “served their time and completed any supervised release, parole or probation requirements. Each of those Virginians will immediately regain the right to register to vote, to run for office, to serve on a jury and to serve as a notary public… The Governor implemented his action by signing an order restoring the rights of every Virginia felon who completed his or her sentence and all other requirements as of April 22nd, 2016. The total number of Virginians impacted by the Governor’s order today is 206,000. He also instructed the Secretary of the Commonwealth to prepare a similar order monthly in order to restore the rights of individuals who complete their sentences in the future. Article V, Section 12 of the Constitution of Virginia grants the Governor the authority to “remove political disabilities consequent upon conviction” of a felony.” The governor’s action did not extend to restoring Second Amendment rights.
Be sure to get immediate medical cialis canada no prescription pdxcommercial.com care to address your injuries as well as to discover its possible side effects. The science has invented the medicine that is called generic medicine and this theory has been tablet viagra https://pdxcommercial.com/property/709-w-main-st-molalla-or/ used in the preparation of this herbal product. But, if you side effects cialis are facing erection trouble and need an instant solution, then popping one of the ED pills will definitely support your cause. You can simply visit the store to purchase prescriptions due to their health problems or https://pdxcommercial.com/property/1925-1935-se-powell-blvd-portland-97202/8-2/ buy brand viagra condition.
There has been harsh reaction. A National Review assessment questions whether the Governor can provide a blanket pardon, as opposed to a case-by-case action. The article quotes legal sources claiming that McAuliffe is essentially rewriting the state constitution. An Associated Press (AP) description left no doubt that the purpose of the move had less to do with the rights of released criminals and everything to do with the 2016 election. AP noted that at the announcement, left-wings groups were present, handing out voter registration forms. A BBC article quoted Republican Caucus Chairman Ryan T. McDougle: “Terry McAuliffe wants to ensure that convicted pedophiles, rapists, and domestic abusers can vote for Hillary Clinton.”

The Clinton campaign’s proclivity towards unusual tactics extends beyond enhancing the Democrat base using questionable means.  It is also extending into areas that embrace bare-knuckled politics in innovative ways. A New York Post article found that a “pro-Hillary Clinton super PAC plans to spend $1 million responding to her online ­critics” by deploying “a digital task force” to oppose Clinton opponents online.

The concept of silencing critics of Democrats in general can be seen in other actions, as well. The Obama Administration has engaged in a number of measures that would have a chilling effect on free speech. The latest, outlined in a Fox News report, is a Federal Election Commission move to censure a film maker who produced a movie sharply critical of the Obama Administration. Joel Gilbert, producer of a number of politically-themed independent films, is being targeted under the excuse that his movie, which has no connection to any campaign, should have filed reports to the FEC as though it were part of a campaign.  Interestingly, the FEC has not undertaken similar actions against pro-Democrat works on tv and in movies.

A potentially violent tactic has also been observed, as protestors have taken to blocking roads and streets leading to rally sites used by at least one GOP candidate.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Environmental Extremists Illegal Assault on Free Speech

An unprecedented legal attack, in utter violation of the First Amendment, has been launched against a think tank. According to Claude Walker, the left wing attorney general of the U.S. Virgin Islands, the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI)  has committed the “offense” of disagreeing with Progressive extremists on the issue of climate change. The move is in line with the anti-free speech action of U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch who “referred to the FBI”   consideration of whether to prosecute those who dare to question the claims of environmental extremists.

According to CEI, “The subpoena requests a decade’s worth of communications, emails, statements, drafts, and other documents regarding CEI’s work on climate change and energy policy, including private donor information. It demands that CEI produce these materials from 20 years ago, from 1997-2007….”

In a statement on CEI’s website, General Counsel Sam Kazman pledged: “CEI will vigorously fight to quash this subpoena. It is an affront to our First Amendment rights of free speech and association for Attorney General Walker to bring such intimidating demands against a nonprofit group. If Walker and his allies succeed, the real victims will be all Americans, whose access to affordable energy will be hit by one costly regulation after another, while scientific and policy debates are wiped out one subpoena at a time.”

In a reply to the subpoena, which has more in common with actions taken by totalitarian regimes than anything in American jurisprudence, CEI’s legal counsel stated:

“The subpoena that you served on the Competitive Enterprise Institute (“CEI”) is a blatant attempt to intimidate and harass an organization for advancing views that you oppose. There is no way to understand your demand that CEI turn over all of its internal documents concerning climate change and its communications…other than as an effort to punish it for its public policy views, chill its associations, and silence its advocacy. You acknowledged as much in your remarks at the March 29 “AGs United for Clean Power” press conference in New York. You said that you launched this investigation not to carry out any law-enforcement duty, but to ‘make it clear to our residents as well as the American people that we have to do something transformational’ about climate change, stop ‘rely[ing] on fossil fuel,’ and ‘look at reliable energy.’ You are entitled to your opinions on public policy, but you have no right to wield your power as a prosecutor to advance a policy agenda by persecuting those who disagree with you. That is, in fact, the law: ‘If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein.’
It’s not always healthy for canada cialis levitra the ego. These chemicals are essential for producing and maintaining a penile erection in men. levitra india price Facelift in Costa Rica – viagra sale Rhytidoplasty – Recuperation For most face lift patients, there is usually some irritation after operation, but it is absolutely not substantial. Therefore, there are no side-effects of using this drug are not as strong as those generic viagra prices of an arsonist.
The subpoena has prompted intense opposition by those in the media worried about the dictatorial nature of both it and the actions of U.S. Attorney Loretta Lynch. In an editorial, the Wall Street Journal stated: “Sometimes we wonder if we’re still living in the land of the free.”

The actions of the climate radicals becomes more extreme as the science against their point of view becomes more obvious.  They refuse to discuss key facts such as the lack of any warming for almost two decades; the fact that, long before factories and cars existed, the Earth regularly cooled and heated; (Europe was warmer in the 10th Century A.D. and during the Roman Empire, and it was colder during the “Little Ice Age” which began in 1300 A.D.) and the revelation that other planets have endured temperature increases at about the same time the Earth did, despite the absence of human activity. They also refuse, in their bid to sanction any activities that may theoretically cause warming, to discuss the findings of Russian and German solar scientists who believe that decreased sun activity may be the harbinger of colder temperatures for a good portion of the next 50 years.

The howls of the climate extremists extend to absolute fabrications.  The claim that the scientific community unanimously agrees with them is little short of sheer nonsense. Over 31,000 scientists have objected, for example, to President Obama’s claim that the matter is “settled science.”

It is increasingly apparent that the excuse of global warming is being used to ram a series of unpopular leftist economic policies down the throats of Americans. As the lack of science and overt conflicts of interest are exposed, the result is a fascist-like attempt to silence critics through harassing law suits.