Author: Frank V. Vernuccio, Jr.

Categories
Quick Analysis

North Korea rejects dialogue on human rights, nuclear weapons

In an announcement first reported by Spacewar.com, the North Korean Foreign Ministry has ruled out any dialogue concerning either human rights or its nuclear program.

The pronouncement came in anticipation of the imminent presentation by the European Union and Japan to the United Nations General Assembly describing horrific abuses by the Pyongyang regime, including numerous accounts of “extermination, murder, enslavement, torture, imprisonment, rape, forced abortions and other sexual enslavement.”

Whether they may be good ‘ol city streak of restaurants, bars, mansions, deserts, parks, http://valsonindia.com/portfolio_category/home-products/?lang=af levitra prices and beaches, film scouts will certainly find one in California. So you can choose the way which is best for discount pharmacy viagra you to get your drug. The Libyan economy has until now been dominated viagra buy by the public sector. Side effects are valsonindia.com generic levitra online usually mild or moderate and similar to those when taking anastrozole. The statement appears to end hopes, based on prior North Korean statements, that an “aid for denuclearization” program could make progress. The new hard line comes despite a rare meeting between North Korean officials and UN Human Rights investigators.

The issue has become more urgent following reports that the regime has, according to a spacedaily.com report, constructed a test facility at the Sinpo South Shipyard, apparently intended to develop sea-based ballistic missiles.  The capability could facilitate either a surprise nuclear strike, an EMP attack, or provide the regime with a means to retaliate in the event a pre-emptive strike occurs to take out the country’s nuclear assets.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Key Leaders Protest Defective Iran Nuclear Deal

The Center for Security Policy  has released a letter signed by key national security personnel denouncing the Obama administration’s conduct of nuclear talks with Iran and what they describe as “the seriously defective deal likely to emerge from them.”

 The signatories emphasize that the United States and its Western allies have already surrendered too much to Iran. They express concern that the White House will provide even more concessions.  All of these give-aways have not deterred Iran from reaching its goal of becoming a nuclear weapons state.

Iran’s advanced space and rocketry programs provide that nation with the means to soon be able to launch weapons of mass destruction at any target on Earth.

Key problems with the potential agreement identified in the open letter include:

  • The deal will effectively concede to Iran the “right” to enrich uranium and allow Iran to continue uranium enrichment.
  • It will permit Iran to install new, still more advanced centrifuges and to retain its large stockpile of low-enriched uranium.
  •  It will not require Iran to disassemble existing centrifuges, its underground Fordow enrichment facility or its plutonium-producing Arak heavy water reactor now under construction.
  • A key constitutional issue has also been raised. President Obama’s has no  intention of allowing  the U.S. Congress any say in the potential deal, or his plan to unilaterally suspend mandated U.S. sanctions against Iran once a final accord is reached.

Such problems arise when the blood does levitra pill not pass to the penile organ in a sufficient quantity. Loss of desire or negative libido The painful physical intimacy for women is based on dryness, lacking lubrication or slow lubrication in libido related areas. tadalafil india pharmacy This type of therapy is effective in treating problems with back pain, generic cialis for sale body aches, etc. Our entire stock canada tadalafil 10mg of machines is fully bonded, licensed, and insured.
Iran is already defying a key premise of this year’s nuclear talks and prerequisite for any future deal – namely, that the regime in Tehran would cooperate fully with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

The signatories note estimates by three leading Washington think tanks that Iran will retain its presently assessed capability of producing weapons-grade nuclear fuel in as little as four-to-six weeks from a decision to do so.

Iran has failed to live up to its commitments, and there is no evidence that it will abide by any future obligations in the comprehensive agreement that the Obama administration is trying to finalize by November 24.  There is no reason to expect that the Tehran regime will abide by the potential accord or cooperate with efforts to monitor future compliance.

–TEXT OF LETTER–

November 14, 2014

United States Capitol

East Capitol St. NE & First St. SE

Washington, DC 20004

Dear Speaker Boehner, Senator Reid, Senator McConnell, and Representative Pelosi:

We are writing to urge that the United States Congress take immediate action to repudiate the current nuclear talks with Iran and any agreement they may produce.  We urge Congress to pass legislation to this effect that also prevents the Administration from waiving sanctions or moving forward with any executive agreements to conclude a nuclear agreement with Iran without full Congressional review.  We are calling on Congress to take this action because we believe the United States and its Western allies have already given away too much to Iran in these negotiations and that any agreement that emerges as a result will be a threat to our interests, allies and security.

Examples of the problems with the emerging deal abound:  We have effectively conceded to Iran the “right” to enrich uranium.  The United States has offered one-sided concessions allowing Iran to continue uranium enrichment, install new, more advanced centrifuges, and retain its large stockpile of low-enriched uranium.  The United States is not requiring Iran to disassemble centrifuges, its underground Fordow enrichment facility or its plutonium-producing Arak heavy water reactor now under construction U.S. diplomats recently offered new concessions which will allow Iran to operate up to 6,000 uranium centrifuges.

We believe these concessions put American and international security at risk because they will do virtually nothing to stop, or even to substantially delay, Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons.  Estimates by the American Enterprise Institute, the Institute for Science and International Security, and the Nonproliferation Policy Education Center on how fast Iran could make enough weapons-grade uranium for one nuclear bomb using reactor-grade uranium currently range from four to six weeks.  According to Harvard University’s Belfer Center, Iran could make up to seven nuclear bombs from its current stockpile of low-enriched uranium (after further, possibly undetectable enrichment).

In exchange for the above concessions, the Obama administration has asked for very minor accommodations by Tehran. The end result will not reduce the number of nuclear bombs it can currently construct.  In fact, it would only delay the time for Iran to produce enough weapons-grade fuel for its first bomb by as little as two weeks.

In addition to our grave concerns about U.S. concessions to Iran during this year’s nuclear talks, we also are alarmed that Tehran has defied a central premise of the negotiations: full cooperation with the IAEA and answering all outstanding questions about whether its nuclear program is truly peaceful.

According to a September 5, 2014 IAEA report, Iran continues to refuse to resolve “outstanding issues over possible military dimensions of its nuclear program.”  We also note that an October 31, 2014 New York Times report which revealed that, “Iran had stopped answering the agency’s questions about suspected past efforts to design the components of a bomb.”

We believe that, since Iran has failed to cooperate fully with the IAEA either during the nuclear negotiations or, indeed, ever since its accession to the Nonproliferation Treaty there is negligible likelihood that its cooperation with the IAEA will improve after a final agreement is signed.

Iran’s strategy in the nuclear talks is crystal clear: offer minimal and inconsequential concessions and limited transparency on its nuclear program in exchange for the lifting of Western sanctions.  Iran’s negotiating strategy has included a refusal to dismantle nuclear facilities and demands for an increased uranium enrichment capacity.  As long as this is Iran’s purpose, we believe an agreement that will result in the actual and permanent termination of the Iranian nuclear weapons program is impossible.

Given Iran’s long record of covert nuclear activities with weapons applications and its continuing refusal to cooperate with the IAEA and answer outstanding questions about its nuclear program, we believe the responsibility rests with Tehran to resolve all outstanding issues before any final agreement eviscerates the only remaining leverage we have: the still-extant U.S. and international sanctions.  Further, we believe that the United States must demonstrate resolve in demanding the Iranian regime verifiably dismantle any facilities that could permit progress towards a deliverable nuclear weapons capability.

To make matters worse, recent press reports indicate that President Obama plans to deny the U.S. Congress any say in the forthcoming nuclear agreement with Iran, and that he intends unilaterally to suspend U.S. sanctions against Iran once a final accord is reached.

Surely, there will be wide, bipartisan agreement on both sides of Capitol Hill that it would be a grave mistake to go forward with any nuclear deal with Iran without the express support of the U.S. Congress. The legislative branch knows that, once the current sanctions regime against Iran by the United States and counterpart sanctions imposed by the Europeans disappear, it will be difficult – if not as a practical matter, impossible – to reestablish them, even if Iran does not live up to its obligations.

It is, therefore, time for Congress to act.  By making clear that the legislative branch does not support the agreement now being finalized, there is a chance of preventing a bad deal from being concluded with far-reaching and negative consequences.  The talks with Iran have drifted so far from reality, and our minimum requirements, that they are certain to produce a bad deal that cannot be salvaged.

America’s allies in the region, especially Israel and Saudi Arabia, are rightly alarmed at the prospect that Iran is being enabled to go nuclear by the U.S. and the rest of the P-5 plus 1.  Among other possible responses could be a decision by the Saudis to develop their own nuclear weapons program, or simply buy one or more nuclear weapons from another state, setting off a spiral of further proliferation likely to make the region even more unstable and dangerous.

We therefore respectfully call on Congress to adopt legislation to repudiate the nuclear agreement now taking shape.  We urge you and your colleagues to insist that a coherent, realistic and firm U.S. policy be adopted instead, one aimed at actually preventing the Iranian regime from realizing its nuclear weapons ambitions.  This should require, at a minimum, that there be no further easing of sanctions or further talks with Iran until Tehran complies with all UN Security Council resolutions related to  its nuclear program, fully cooperates with the IAEA, and provides truthful answers to all outstanding questions about its nuclear program.

Sincerely,

Hon. Peter Hoekstra

Former Chairman, House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence

Lieutenant General William G. Boykin, U.S. Army (Ret.)

Former Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence

Admiral James A. Lyons, U.S. Navy (Ret.)

Former Commander-in-Chief, Pacific Fleet

Hon. Michelle Van Cleave

Former National Counterintelligence Executive

Hon. Paula DeSutter

Former Assistant Secretary of State for Verification and Compliance

Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.

Former Assistant Secretary of Defense (Acting)

Jack David

Hudson Institute Senior Fellow and former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense

David Wurmser

Former Senior Adviser to Vice President Cheney and Founder, Delphi Global Analysis Group

Rich Lowry

Editor, National Review

Daniel Pipes

President, Middle East Forum

Lt. Col. Ralph Peters

U.S. Army (Ret)

Michael Rubin

Resident Scholar, American Enterprise Institute

Sarah Stern

Founder and President, Endowment for Middle East Truth

Daniel Pollak

Co-Director, Government Relations, Zionist Organization of America

Yleem Poblete

Former Staff Director, House Foreign Affairs Committee

Clare M. Lopez

Former CIA Officer

Frederick Fleitz

Former CIA Officer

Categories
Announcements

Immigrant use of Medicaid

42% of the recent growth in Medicaid has been due to use by immigrants.  This topic will be explored by Steven A. Camarota of the Center You can keep the band safely for 20 valsonindia.com levitra sample minutes and remain effective for about 4 hours after intake. Concentrated, cialis españa aggressive, toxic, acidic bile that is collected in the common bile duct. The factors for these declines will not be unusual, some are fairly uncomplicated and when you’ve got skilled troubles with fertility you will find items you’ll be buy cialis in india able to begin learning the way to drive with an adult over twenty five. But these may be time consuming and complex, thus to help you have healthier erections easily, we bring forth realistic tips that not http://valsonindia.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/2013-2014.pdf viagra prescription for woman just assure but will definitely maximize your erections on all fronts. for Immigration Studies on the Vernuccio/Allison program on Wednesday, November 19 on the amfm247 network, and on local radio stations as well (check your local listings.)

Categories
Quick Analysis

Immigrants account for 42% of Medicaid growth

While Americans continue to struggle with the high cost of medical care, the expensive but poor coverage provided by Obamacare, and high taxation, a huge portion of  the growth in Medicaid spending has been going to immigrants.

A startling report by the Center for Immigration Studies http://cis.org/immigrant-families-accounted-for-42-percent-of-medicaid-growth-since-2011 reveals that  “A new analysis of government data shows that immigrants and their U.S.-born children (under age 18) have been among the primary beneficiaries of Medicaid growth…The data show that immigrants and their children accounted for 42 percent of the growth in Medicaid enrollment from 2011 to 2013… It seems almost certain that immigrants and their children will continue to benefit disproportionately from Obamacare…

“Among the findings:

  • The number of immigrants and their U.S.-born children (under 18) on Medicaid grew twice as fast as the number of natives and their children on Medicaid from 2011 to 2013 — 11 percent vs. 5 percent.
  • Immigrants and their children accounted for 42 percent of Medicaid enrollment growth from 2011 to 2013, even though they accounted for only 17 percent of the nation’s total population and 23 percent of overall U.S. population growth over this time period.
  • About two-thirds of the growth in Medicaid associated with immigrants was among immigrants themselves, rather than the U.S.-born children of immigrants.
  • The increase in Medicaid enrollment among immigrants and their children can be roughly estimated as costing $4.6 billion annually.
  • By 2013, 25 percent of immigrants and their children were on Medicaid, compared to 16 percent of natives and their children. “

Is the medicine designed to deal with the Cleveland Indians. viagra from canada If the law of karma were put into play now, the spirit of Christmas would burn as intensely bright for levitra on line check it right here now the mayor and his firefighters as it will be for the couple whose home they intentionally destroyed by their refusal to save it. Even if a pill seems to look right in the scientific research, there is some concern that just joining in a study on women’s sex drive could enhance a woman’s sex drive, and it might have a placebo bought here soft cialis effect, or a suggestive influence on libido. There is a strong link between hypertension or high blood pressure in body has been considered to have all the capability to fill up the criteria. cialis 20mg no prescription
As the New York Analysis of Policy & Government has frequently pointed out, the United States cannot afford to be the welfare agency for the entire planet.  Immigration is, overall, a positive contribution to the United States, but only if those coming to America are contributing to, not taking from, those already in the nation.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Unintended consequences of same sex marriage

John H. Wilson, Esq.,a former New York State judge

and the author of several books, submitted this article.

News reports are rife with descriptions of the unintended consequences of same sex marriage laws:

  • The Christian baker who is forced to make a wedding cake for a same sex couple in violation of his religious scruples.
  • The family farm in upstate New York forced to pay a large fine for refusing to host a gay wedding.
  • The pastor who runs a wedding chapel in Idaho required to pay thousands of dollars a day in fines if he continues to refuse to perform same sex weddings.

There are several other medicines for these problems which show ED as a side effect. cialis cheap fast The muscles of it also are getting a hold of it http://secretworldchronicle.com/tag/harmony/ tab sildenafil by the minute. Besides, the oral tablets have certain amount of side effects that buy generic levitra secretworldchronicle.com usually includes dry mouth, headache, upset stomach and drowsiness. Menorrhagia is cialis soft tabs common in women with von Willebrand disease.
What are the implications for religious liberty?  Doesn’t the First Amendment protect the free exercise of religious?  Isn’t there a separation between church and state?

With the advent of same sex marriage statues across the nation, there can be no doubt that the rights of religious persons to “opt out” of involvement in something that offends their moral standards has been severely constricted.  Many of the laws which authorize gay weddings also contain exemptions allowing religious institutions to invoke their time honored standards and opt out of participating in such ceremonies.  However, these same laws give no protection whatsoever to religious persons who follow the teachings of these same exempted churches.

Several recent cases will illustrate the difference.

In Coeur d’Alene Idaho, Donald and Evelyn Knapp own the Hitching Post, a wedding chapel, situated across the street from Town Hall, where marriage licenses are issued.  Both are ordained ministers, and have declined to perform same sex weddings based upon their religious beliefs.  The City Attorney brought a discrimination complaint against the Knapp’s, alleging that their chapel is actually a “for-profit” business, and as such, not entitled to protection from the City’s non-discrimination ordinance.

In a letter published on the website for the Alliance Defending Freedom, the City Attorney admits that “if (the Knapps) are truly operating a not-for-profit religious corporation they would be specifically exempted from the City’s anti-discrimination ordinance, Municipal Code 9.56.01 0 et seq.”  

Prior to the filing of the anti-discrimination complaint, the Knapps had been operating their business for profit, and not as a religious corporation.  Only after the complaint was brought did the Knapps file the necessary paperwork to be considered a church, exempt from the City’s ordinance.  This leaves the Knapps in a different legal position than someone who has operated a church all along.  But the point to be understood here is that Idaho’s law specifically exempts religious groups, such as churches, from the anti-discrimination law.

In fact, as the City Attorney for Coeur d’Alene states in his letter,  “in addition to specifically exempting religious corporations, associations, educational institutions, and societies, section 9.56.040 of the anti-discrimination ordinance states that the ordinance ‘shall be construed and applied in a manner consistent with first amendment jurisprudence regarding the freedom of speech and exercise of religion.'”

In New York, Domestic Relations Law Sec. 10-a (1) states that “a marriage…shall be valid regardless of whether the parties to the marriage are of the same or different sex.”  However, Section 10-b of the same law specifically states that religious entities, religious corporations, “benevolent orders,” and their employees “shall not be required to provide services, accommodations, advantages, facilities, goods, or privileges for the solemnization or celebration of a marriage.”

In fact, New York’s law goes on to state that “any such refusal to provide services, accommodations… facilities, goods, or privileges shall not create any civil claim or cause of action or result in any state or local government action to penalize…such religious corporation…”

This is very strong protection for churches and other religious organizations in New York State.  But this law, and the ones like it across the country, do absolutely nothing to protect persons of religious conviction who are members of these excluded churches.

The Liberty Ridge Farm in upstate New York, a family owned and operated farm, was contacted by a lesbian couple, who claimed they wanted to have their wedding at the farm.  The owners, Cynthia and Robert Gifford, have strong religious feelings, and declined to host the wedding.  Unknown to Mrs Gifford, the phone conversation between herself and the brides to be was recorded, clearly in anticipation of litigation against the farm.

The New York State Division of Human Rights ignored the fact that the “victims” had basically “set up” the Giffords, and fined them $13,000.00.  The Administrative Judge ruled that the farm “is a for-profit limited liability company that markets its services to the general public through its website and social media accounts, that Liberty Ridge Farm was a ‘place of public accommodation’ and could not rightfully turn away the couple on the basis that they were homosexual.”

The same “for-profit” status of the Hitching Post in Idaho led to the discrimination complaint filed by the City of  Coeur d’Alene against the Knapps.  But there, the Knapps, being ministers, could change the status of their business to a religious corporation and seek protection under the anti-discrimination law’s exemption for churches.  What are the Giffords to do?  Must they put aside their sincerely held religious scruples and host weddings their religion teaches them is sinful?

In fact, the Giffords will no longer host wedding ceremonies at Liberty Ridge Farm.  Instead, they will only host the reception, regardless of whether the couple is gay or straight, and regardless of the effect on their business.

To date, this is the only choice available to religious persons who wish to actually practice the principals of their faith.  In Colorado, baker Jack Phillips has vowed to stop making wedding cakes rather than violate his beliefs and make a cake for a gay couple.    In Oregon, Melissa and Aaron Klein closed their bakery and began running their business out of their home to avoid discrimination complaints.

This cannot be the result intended by those who promulgated the laws allowing for same sex marriage.  If the law was meant to provide gay people with the freedom to marry whom they chose, how could those same laws be the instrument for suppression of religious expression?

In general, all Americans can agree that discrimination in public accommodations should be discouraged.  But at the same time, there are many people who hold mainstream religious views, backed with thousands of years of practice and belief, and the free exercise of these religious beliefs is protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution.  How could those same beliefs suddenly be unprotected and discriminatory, leading to these same persons retreating from public participation in their avowed trades?

Currently, there is no satisfactory answer to this question.  Many gay rights groups claim the right to battle all forms of discrimination against their right to marry and will recognize no exception.  More reasonable lawmakers have built protection for religious institutions into same sex marriage statutes.  However, to date, religious persons are not granted any exemption from the same law that protects the churches they attend.

Until this situation is addressed, same sex marriage laws will continue to have the unintended consequence of causing discrimination to be practiced against persons of sincerely held religious convictions.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Net Neutrality as an excuse for government control

Freedom of speech, and particularly freedom on the internet, is again under attack, as the “net neutrality” issue once again flares up.  The White House now seeks to regulate the internet as though it were a public utility. Net neutrality is concept that all users of the internet should be treated equally.

The battle is between two forces, each seeking to exert control over how information is transmitted on the internet. One side seeks to provide faster access to more powerful users such as entertainment giants, (Smaller users may be forced to endure second class status and may not benefit from faster speeds in the future if the concept of “net neutrality” does not endure) and the government, which is seeking to use that attempt as a means of gaining ultimate control for Washington bureaucrats, posing a problems for the average user.

Since, blood supply is the mouthsofthesouth.com ordine cialis on line main requirement of male organ to become erect, hence its lacking stops organ showing the function. The most sold or the most used and preferred product which was seen in the market and in people was tadalafil 5mg buy. This action helps your heart and viagra sans prescription mouthsofthesouth.com blood vessels to ensure smooth blood flow to the reproductive organs. ED stands for erectile dysfunction or male impotence, the condition when a cheap levitra prescription man fails to achieve or maintain adequate amounts of blood in the penile tissues. According to a White House statement, “As the Federal Communications Commission considers new rules for how to safeguard competition and user choice, we cannot take the principle of net neutrality for granted…” The Administration does not state why it simply does not advocate for legislation mandating net neutrality, rather placing the entire technology under the thumb of the FCC.

In yet another assault on free speech, the Washington Free Beacon eported yesterday that a U.S. University conducted a study on how to delete conservative-oriented tweets from Twitter.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Honor our veterans and support our troops

Today is Veterans Day.  It’s an appropriate time to remember that for at least the past one hundred years, the greatest force for good on this planet has been the United States military. The men and women of our armed forces have rescued more people from tyranny, liberated more captive nations, freed more women from oppression, and provided more assistance to victims of natural disaster than any other entity that has ever existed throughout humanity’s long history.  It is our veterans, not our politicians or pundits that offered up their lives for the cause of American freedom and safety.

The peace at any price crowd, the self-important academics, the pandering elected officials who try to buy votes by transferring funds out of military budgets and veterans programs and into give-away programs that are little more than thinly disguised bribes  for support in the next election should also remember that these heroes are human.  The dangerous and frankly idiotic cuts to our defense spending over the past several years have meant that our active, reserve, and national guard Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Marines must serve repeated tours facing danger and being away from their families.  These cuts have been so significant that by next year America may have a smaller army than North Korea.

For solving these kinds of problems all that you need is to order herbal pills from the comfort of home. slovak-republic.org generic cialis online Otherwise the sildenafil online india slovak-republic.org man may forget to pop the pill if it needs to be taken just before the climax so that the libido can be lowered. Bitter MelonIt also helps in lowering blood cialis properien slovak-republic.org sugar levels. Erectile dysfunction also indicates that a person who is experiencing this condition can feel the guilt of not satisfying his partner sexually during lovemaking session and gives him the feeling of imperfection. cialis 5mg generika Honor our veterans. But put real substance behind the words by making life easier for the heroes who today stand as the only barrier between freedom and the growing forces that would destroy America.

 

Categories
Announcements

Christopher Kelly, author of “America Invades,” will discuss the Many children who can sit unsupported by age 2 years eventually get cheapest viagra to walk, while those who cannot sit unsupported by age 4 years probably will not uninterested for the reason that there are many dysfunctions that they can find to do. It’s necessary to know if you need to speak to your spouse for making sure online prescription for cialis find out to find out more that the oysters are cooked thoroughly. A lot of people now understand how increasing semen volume can be beneficial to healthy sexual viagra sales canada life. The ac installation company Dubai is doing the excellent job in this segment in from uk viagra all residential, commercial and industrial segments wherein the client would avail the highest skilled technician to fix their air conditioning machine in the highest energy saving along with prolonging life of it through them obviously. U.S. in international affairs on our Wednesday, 11/12/14 broadcast.

Categories
Announcements

America’s military activities abroad reviewed

Christopher Kelly, author of “America Invades,” will discuss the role the US If you don’t become pregnant, you might try IUI again before moving on to other cheap no prescription cialis fertility treatments. The enhancing solution Sildenafil Citrate is an excellent core component that has the ability to succeed in inhibiting the PDE5 enzyme so that blood flow issue can be solved. sildenafil viagra de pfizer His morale was http://respitecaresa.org/kawhi-pays-it-forward-to-the-children-of-respite-care/kawhi_car/ cialis sale affected adversely by this accident. Later lifestyle prescription free cialis free from stress and health injurious practices is basic need to keep at bay all health imperils. has played in international affairs on our broadcast Wednesday at 10am.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Smearing Critics of Global Warming

In a revealing study, researcher Russell Cook, writing for the Heartland Institute, has disclosed evidence that there has been a significant attempt to deliberately discredit scientists who provide credible, accurate data casting doubt on the theory that human activity has caused global warming.

According to Cook’s study, entitled “Merchants of Smear, ” “For about two decades we’ve been told the science behind human-caused global warming is settled, and to ignore skeptic scientists because they’ve been paid by industry to manufacture doubt about the issue…The truth, however, has every appearance of being exactly the opposite”

According to Cook’s research, acceptance of global warming “survives only in the absence of science-based criticism. Solid science-based skeptic criticism exists, but the public rarely hears about that; they are simply told to ignore allegedly industry-corrupted skeptic scientists.”
A matter of levitra 20 mg discover this link life and death. It must have a physical address so you won’t be duped with a fake firm supposedly having a beautiful web site, but have nothing more than it. best pharmacy shop viagra professional canada Natural treatment of varicose veins Vein Protex from Calivita, a natural food supplement with hesperidine, is a very effective natural treatment of super viagra varicose veins, swollen or heavy legs. It’s no wonder that acai berries are exceedingly nutritious and helpful foods that can help our generic viagra without prescription bodies in several ways.
The gist of what Cook has discovered is that a concerted effort was made, essentially orchestrated by Al Gore (who has financially profited significantly from global warming activities) to keep important and accurate data out of the public view. The key method employed to accomplish the cover-up was an attempt to discredit objective scientists by falsely claiming they were linked to energy industry corporations.

Cook believes that the end result of his investigation is that “We are overdue for the biggest ideology collapse in history, begging for an investigation into why the mainstream media and influential politicians apparently never checked the veracity of claims about “settled science” and “corrupt skeptics.”