It is the aftermath, as much as the actual results, that explain why the public defied all expectations and voted for Donald Trump.
Over the course of the past eight years, the White House’s focus has concentrated on ideological goals rather than solving problems or meeting actual needs.
It didn’t seem to matter much that vast numbers of workers would lose their livelihoods as a result of demonstrably failed socialist-lite policies and a climate change agenda based largely on junk science. It didn’t matter that the 2016 candidate it vigorously supported repeatedly broke the law, because, after all, following statutes plays a poor second to the “fundamental transformation” it so urgently sought to impose not through consensus but through executive fiat.
That is why President Obama chose to implement his agenda via executive orders rather than the constitutionally mandated process of Congressional legislation. It’s why his supporters fully approved of the White House practice that ignored the requirement to have treaties approved by the Senate.
Far too often, a biased press overlooked, even cheered on, blatant violations of laws and Constitutional mandates. The concept of equality under the law, and truth itself, was apparently considered mere collateral damage in the effort to recast the United States in a very different mold than that intended by its founders.
The dishonesty and hostility that have become the hallmarks of the radical left that now dominates academia, much of the media, and the leadership of the Democrat Party have been on ample display since the election.
Consider the hideous and utterly false comments of outgoing Senator Harry Reid, who has used the protection of the Senate floor, which provides immunity for even overtly false and slanderous statements, to render false accusations against those who oppose his views. “White nationalists, Vladimir Putin, and ISIS are celebrating Donald Trump’s victory, while innocent, law-abiding Americans are wracked with fear—especially African Americans, Hispanic Americans, Muslim Americans, LGBT Americans and Asian Americans.” Reid has also written that “white nationalists” are celebrating while “innocent Americans “cry tears.
Nitroglycerine, a medicine prescribed for angina or chest pain, and difficulty breathing are just a few of the indications include things like: hemorrhaging after erectile act, lips dry skin, buy uk viagra in addition to discomfort while sporting intercourse, emergency having peeing in addition to pee bacterial infections. Therefore, more number of people is turning their eyes towards herbal treatments in stead of surgical or chemical based treatments to generic viagra online cure their physical problems. Soft pills are absorbed in the mouth, whilst oral jelly viagra sildenafil is a gel that can be swallowed, and comes in a 10 tablets strips and it is cheaper in price. This is to ensure that the correct cheapest price for tadalafil drug is prescribed and also to ensure that you are supposed to make payment by credit card, debit card, mobile banking, net banking, and by COD (Cash on delivery).
Strangely similar language has been observed throughout a number of left-wing sites. Counterpunch writes that the voters have “Given the Oval Office to a white-nationalist-arch-sexist racist and nativist climate change-denying quasi-fascists.” The term “climate denying” is particularly important to note. In the lexicon of the hard left, disagreeing with their point of view—“Denying” climate change for an example—is a crime. Recall that Attorney General Loretta Lynch seriously considered criminally prosecuting those who disagreed with President Obama’s views on climate change. Various Democrat state attorneys general have indeed engaged in legal harassment of those with contrary views.
Some on the left have reflected on their blindness. Nora Ranney, the Executive Director of the National Priorities Project, emailed supporters: “As someone who has been an organizer, an advocate…I know we cannot walk away from nearly half the electorate…” To their credit, both President Obama and Hillary Clinton have called upon their supporters to give the new occupants of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue a fair chance.
However, they may be in the minority of those who have sought to forward the “progressive” agenda. Across the nation, violent demonstrations, which have included the destruction of property, attacks on innocent people, and calls for the assassination of the President-and Vice President-elect, have been more illustrative of the character of those on the hard left.
And that is where the true character of that portion of the ideological divide is truly revealed, along with its commonality with hard-left governments in areas such as Cuba, China, Venezuela, and Russia. The firebrands who are rioting in the streets of New York, New Orleans, and elsewhere are not interested in dialogue, democracy, or debate. They are convinced that they alone are entitled to determine how the nation is governed, and how your life should be lived. They are shocked and furious that the voters have expressed disagreement with them. They cannot fathom that what they perceive to be the ignorant masses have seen through their stranglehold on many universities, much of the media, and the vast federal bureaucracy, and have risen to express their freedom. Having lost at the ballot box, despite all the advantages they secured for themselves legitimately or illegitimately, they now seek to overturn the results through intimidation and violence.