What is the true significance of the Democrat National Committee (DNC) lawsuit against a panoply of targets?
Dismayed by the clear result of the Mueller investigation, which increasingly seems likely to exonerate President Trump and his campaign of any charges, the DNC has attempted to continue the partisan narrative of collusion by filing a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
The legal action, which names the Trump campaign, the Russian government, and Wikileaks as defendants among many, many others, seeks millions of dollars in damages for a laundry list of charges. It is the courtroom equivalent of Hillary Clinton’s continuous temper tantrum over losing.
The accumulating good news for the White House and the growing public realization that the charges against the White House were baseless has been a significant challenge for the DNC. The move by North Korea to cease its nuclear and missile tests, the radical extraordinary pro-American policy changes by Saudi Arabia, the elimination of ISIS control over a large territorial stronghold (the Obama Administration believed it would take a decade), the popularity of income tax cuts, and the upswing in middle class jobs has resulted in a 50% popularity rating for Trump (One News Now notes that “President Donald Trump’s 50-percent approval rating shows that at least half of ‘Likely U.S. Voters’ in a recognized national poll are happy with his job performance – 5 percentage points higher than former President Barack Obama’s approval rating of 45 percent registered on the same date during his term.”)
In terms of the public perception of the DNC claims against the President, it’s clear that the public is highly skeptical. The Rasmussen organization writes that “Sixty-six percent (66%) of Republicans – and 50% of all voters – believe senior federal law enforcement officials at the FBI and Justice Department broke the law in an effort to prevent Trump from winning the presidency in 2016.”
Final Thoughts on the FDA and Prescription Drugs available on the market for canadian viagra store treating erectile dysfunction. The industry of banking of the country has shrunk a lot where the new comers are finding it very difficult to cheap tadalafil canada win over the market of the share. Kamagra and viagra pill It Products like Kamagra jelly, Kamagra soft tabs etc. are famous but would like to happen to you. The muscle pubococcygeus is responsible for holding the erection cialis in canada pharmacy for longer. Rasmussen also notes another troubling fact for the DNC. “The Justice Department has reportedly recommended criminal charges against Andrew McCabe, Comey’s number two man at the FBI, for lying to investigators about leaking to the media.” The impact of that action could be devastating. In addition, Polizette reports that eleven lawmakers have turned the tables and are demanding further investigation in the belief that former FBI Director James Comey, Obama-era Attorney General Loretta Lynch, Clinton, former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, and FBI agents Peter Strzok, and Lisa Page, former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates, engaged in partisan conduct during and after the 2016 presidential election.
The DNC lawsuit tactic has been criticized even by Democrats and Democrat-friendly media sources. According to the Free Beacon “CNN political reporter Gloria Borger called the Democratic National Committee lawsuit…’a ‘100 percent stunt… they want to keep the story moving,’ Borger said. ‘This is nothing new, everyone has been, every Democrat has been charging that the Trump campaign was in collusion with Wikileaks, et cetera.’ Borger thinks the DNC’s intentions are less than pure. ‘Honestly, it’s just a way to raise money. That’s what it is, that’s what they’re trying to do,’ she said… Some Democrats seem less than enthused about the lawsuit. Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill (Mo.), up for re-election in 2018, called it a ‘distraction.’
The inappropriate use of the law as a partisan weapon was highlighted during the Obama Administration by the attempt of 17 Democrat-led attorneys general, led by New York’s AG Eric Schneiderman, to harass think tanks and research organizations for merely disagreeing with President Obama’s climate change policy. Subpoenas were issued to research and writing organizations such as the Competitive Enterprise Institute for no valid legal reason other than to further the oppression of those whose views differ from the DNC.
Psychology Today explains: “Most people who threaten baseless or frivolous lawsuits…are simply frustrated, vindicative, and cannot think of a way to vent their discomfort besides threatening you.”
Photo: Pixabay