Corruption Governs in Key State

Recent events in one of the nation’s largest states and in its largest city profoundly reflect upon the condition of American politics.

Since 2007, New York has experienced a bizarre period starting with the gubernatorial election held in 2006, in which Elliot Spitzer handily defeated his Republican challenger in a contest in which the state’s media overwhelming failed to provide equal coverage to the GOP candidate. During the campaign, various state news outlets decided to call Spitzer the “governor presumptive,” dismissing the election out of hand.

Governor Spitzer quickly became ensnared in a sex scandal after being in office only a relatively short period of time. After resigning in its wake, he was succeeded in 2008 by his lieutenant governor, David Paterson, who also became politically wounded due to scandals of his own involving sexual affairs, drug use, and wrongdoing by key aides. He chose not to run for re-election, and was succeeded in 2011 by fellow Democrat Andrew Cuomo, who, in turn, is now being investigated by Preet Bharara, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York.

Some teams have a whole moose family crowding them out. regencygrandenursing.com tadalafil buy in usa Screening vitamin D levels may prove to be a useful tool to https://regencygrandenursing.com/site-map purchase cheap viagra liven things up in the bedroom with your partner if you will be sharing the mattress on a regular basis. If the blood does not reach in proper amount near the area to cause browse content cialis 10 mg all favorable condition, you can have the difficulty in the middle of the game. Berries- find out for more info viagra usa price Many researchers have proven that berries are the best medicines. Since 2007, 11 state Assemblymembers, including 10 Democrats and one Republican, have left office, chose to not run again, or have been indicted due to criminal or ethical charges. Twelve State Senators, including 8 Democrats and four Republicans, have done the same.

The state’s federal elected officials have also faced troubles of their own. Former Rep. Anthony Weiner, a Brooklyn Democrat, was forced to resign in 2011 in the wake of revelations that he texted explicit photos of his genitals to several women. The state’s senior U.S. senator, Charles Schumer, Weiner’s mentor, has not been hit by these types of scandals and remains one of the most powerful men in Washington. However, he has raised many eyebrows by his proposal to alter the First Amendment to allow restrictions on free speech related to campaign contributions.

And then, there is the Mayor of the nation’s largest metropolis. New York City is the top target for terrorism, yet the federal government cannot include Democrat Mayor deBlasio in its planning because of his questionable past in which he assisted the Nicaraguan government at a time when it was assisting the Soviets. It has also been found that his wife’s top aide has a live-in boyfriend who is a convicted murderer.

Quick Analysis

Ukraine’s Frozen Conflict

As we approach winter in the northern hemisphere, the war in Ukraine is beginning to resemble a “frozen conflict” from many perspectives. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky recently told the media he hopes the war will end faster once President-elect Trump takes over in January. Opinions in Moscow, however, differ from that of the Ukrainian leader. Russian President Vladimir Putin argues that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) needs to exclude Ukraine from joining in “exchange” for peace. If it does not, he says, then no end to the war is in sight. So far there is no Christmas solution. Several NATO countries, according to Vladimir Socor of the Jamestown Foundation, are tentatively considering “coalitions-of-the-willing” to provide security for Ukraine outside of the formal NATO framework. There is, however, no collective mechanism today under which such an arrangement is viable. According to the NATO Charter, while Ukraine is a NATO partner country, it may not join as a full member since it has not fulfilled the requirements for membership. That has not stopped NATO and allies from continuing “to provide Ukraine with unprecedented levels of support, helping to uphold its fundamental right to self-defence,” according to the organization. Socor says that keeping Ukraine out of NATO will not advance peace with Russia. Waiting for a peace settlement, he suggests, would only serve to encourage Moscow to continue the war indefinitely. Although the Biden Administration officially withdrew its support for Ukrainian membership in 2021, NATO maintains an “open door” policy toward membership-seeking countries. The current White House position led the way for European states to oppose Ukraine’s membership saying that a decision should be delayed until “conditions are met.” Biden pushed for changing “open door” to a “bridge” metaphor. It is not intended as an across-the-board NATO policy and has been implemented in the past on a case-by-case basis, says Socor. “The alliance’s open-door policy was not fully insulated from Russia’s non-statutory blocking power, and NATO-aspirant countries’ path toward membership was not always irreversible.” Russia has successfully blocked states like Georgia from joining, first in 2008 and again after the war in Ukraine began in 2014. Russia recognizes the value add of Ukraine to NATO is enormous and that Kyiv has a better case than some other nations. Putin’s invasion was, in part, intended to foreclose that option. By 2021, Moscow was pushing hard to maximize its war objectives, which included further annexations of Ukrainian territory. A main goal for Putin was, and is, to ensure there is no Ukraine left to join NATO. As President-elect Trump prepares to assume office in January, he is faced with the historical challenges presented by the war. Post-conflict security guarantees were the center of several proposals made during the 2023 military stalemate. The incoming Trump Administration has yet to outline how it intends to handle the Russia-Ukraine war. Analysts in Washington believe that the new Administration will expect its European allies to guarantee the majority of Ukraine’s security needs. As we approach 2025, several European nations have acknowledged that they do not view Ukraine as eligible for NATO membership as it would draw the organization into the middle of the conflict. Others want to wait until the war is over or pending a “peace” settlement before considering Ukrainian membership. Socor reports that some “influential voices” are suggesting that “Kyiv should join NATO after “freezing” the war along a stable armistice line, de facto accepting Ukraine’s partition, with NATO security guarantees applying de jure to the government-controlled territory only.” This would mean starting accession talks soon with the actual talks to commence only after a ceasefire is in place. Trump arrives in Washington at a time when Putin’s hybrid strategies of war in Ukraine have eviscerated commonly-held differences between war and peace. “Absent a political consensus in NATO over Ukrainian membership, certain European allies, including France’s President Emmanuel Macron, are holding informal consultations about post-conflict security guarantees to Kyiv by NATO members outside of NATO’s framework,” according to the Jamestown Foundation. The Biden Administration downplayed the discussions on possible forms of military assistance and defense industry cooperation by sending only an Assistant Secretary of State. For a European peace to hold the Trump Administration would need to formally extend the United States’ nuclear deterrence to Ukraine. Options under discussion in Europe include a “coalition of the resolute” to deploy forces to Ukraine as part of a possible armistice package, deterring further Russian attacks, says Secor. European officials are also debating, without any agreement, whether its military forces could perform non-combat logistical roles to free Ukrainian forces to fight. None of the possible courses of action has moved forward as all eyes are waiting on the incoming Trump Administration for clues about its intended level of support for a NATO framework and other non-NATO proposals. Daria Novak served in the U.S. State Dept.