Speaking at the 35th Space Symposium in Colorado, Acting Defense Secretary Patrick M/ Shanahan described the national security threats America faces in space, and outlined the necessary response to them.
We must confront reality. Weapons are
currently deployed by our competitors, that can attack our assets in
space.
Both China and Russia have weaponized space with
the intent to hold American space capabilities at risk. China’s communist
government has exercised and continues to develop the capability to jam,
targeting SATCOM, ISR and GPS.
The PLA is also deploying directed-energy
weapons. And we expect them to field a ground-based laser system aimed at
low-earth orbit space sensors by next year.
They’re also prepared to use cyber-attacks
against our space systems, and have deployed an operational ground-based ASAT
missile system. And China has moved rapidly at advanced weapon
capabilities, particularly hypersonics, that we are not capable of
tracking. Russia is doing many of the exact same things.
Meanwhile, in the United Nations, both of them
are pushing international agreements that we know they won’t abide by.
The threat is clear. We’re in an era of great power competition.
And the next major conflict may be won or lost in space.
Because of their actions, space is no longer a
sanctuary. It is now a warfighting domain. This is not a future or
theoretical threat. This is today’s threat.
We are not going to sit back and watch. We
are going to act. We are going to deter conflict from extending into
space, and ensure we can respond decisively if deterrence fails.
Because the stakes are so high, we need to move
with urgency. Our presence in space underpins the department’s ability to
defend our nation, deter aggression and project power globally. Space is
fundamental to our modern way of war.
And our $19 trillion economy increasingly relies
on space, from the GPS you use to navigate, to the delivery drones and
self-driving cars of the future, to the phone you will tweet quotes from my
remarks today, space is fundamental to our modern way of life.
Looking forward, space power will not just be as
vital to strength — it will be just as vital to strength and prosperity of our
country as sea power was, centuries ago.
And just as we developed the U.S. Navy to ensure
freedom, free navigation of the seas, we need a military organization to ensure
free navigation of the stars. America’s future depends on space. We
will develop the forces and capabilities to protect and defend our space
interests.
In addition to the threat, we also see thousands
of satellites going into space in the next few years, as the cost of launch
continues to come down and space technology rapidly advances. This will
unlock new opportunities and increase the importance of space for the American
economy.
Unfortunately, the department is not moving fast
enough to stay ahead. In the language of the private sector, the market
has shifted and our old business model won’t survive.
We have a choice. Change now, or maintain
the status quo. Facing this challenge, senior Pentagon leaders asked a
fundamental question, what does a plan to win in space require? This led
to more questions such as should the department confront the contested space
environment in a dozen different organizations, or as one enterprise?
Should we continue integrating space
capabilities at the level of the Deputy Secretary or should there be a senior
leader in the Pentagon who is accountable for space? Should we man, train
and equip for space in three separate services or consolidate based on one
physical domain?
Should protecting and defending space continue
to be the third priority of the STRATCOM Commander or should there be a
combatant commander focused on space every day? We realized that although
we have the talent we need and the technology at our fingertips, the department
does not currently have the organizational and leadership structure necessary
to move fast, leverage new technology and defend our space interests.
Rather than watch the world evolve around us, we are seizing the strategic initiative. We went back to the drawing board and came up with a new plan. This plan will impose costs on our would-be adversaries and deny them any perceived benefits.
To paraphrase President Reagan, peace in space
requires strength in space. In order to do this, we will consolidate our
space efforts into three parts, U.S. Space Force, U.S. Space Command and the
Space Development Agency.
Part one, and the largest change, is
establishing the United States Space Force, the future sixth branch of our
Armed Forces. Our military is structured around physical domains, Navy on
sea, Army on land, Air Force on air.
Given the changes in the environment, we now
need a military service dedicated to protecting and defending space, the Space
Force. Just like the other military services, the Space Force will be
responsible for organizing, training and equipping the military force.
Two elements of this organized train and equip
mission are worth elaborating on. First, professional development.
This is recruiting, educating and promoting space personnel. Today, space
experts, go through professional military education system focused on either
air, land, or sea power. Space is an add-on, a supporting effort, not the
focus.
The Space Force will build a professional
development system that recruits technical talent, educates them in space from
the beginning and provides a clear promotion path, all to produce the quantity
and quality of space leaders we need to protect and defend space.
Second, organizing and equipping includes force
design and force development. This means understanding the domain, the
technology and warfare deeply enough to design future capabilities and deliver
them, ensuring space power not only today but in the future.
The Space Force will develop requirements, work
with interagency partners, engage with Congress and drive the organizational
focus we need to win in space as the domain evolves. In short, the Space
Force will be responsible for developing military units that can protect and
defend America’s space interests.
The initial numbers of the Space Force are
small, 15[,000] to 20,000 people drawn from existing forces, and by creating
the new service inside the Air Force, the additional cost is less than
one-tenth of one percent of the DOD budget, or put another way, the Space Force
will cost about $1.50 per American per year.
To achieve great outer cialis samples mouthsofthesouth.com looks you have to start from the colon. If you are unable to perform better due to viagra tablets india go now erectile dysfunction, it leads to relationship issues. If you have gone through with any get viagra in canada over at this site surgery, then it may affect your reproductive system. Erectile dysfunction is amongst most common and embarrassing health conditions that let a male personality purchasing this levitra vardenafil generic down in front of their partners.
With help from Congress, we will create the
Space Force and ensure the focus is on growing warfighter capability, not
bureaucracy. The Space Force is a low cost, low bureaucracy proposal that
will ensure that America will have the ability to protect and defend our space
interests for decades to come.
Part two is our new joint combatant command, the
United States Space Command. Currently, space operations are under the
purview of U.S. Strategic Command.
The Commander, a friend to many of you, General
John Hyten, is one of our nation’s leading thinkers on space, but as General
Hyten himself says, space is never better than his third priority, he must
focus on strategic deterrence and nuclear command and control.
This construct worked well when space was
primarily an uncontested supporting mission for others. Today, we need a
command and a commander that spends 100 percent of their time focused on
space. That is – that is why the President directed the establishment of
the new unified U.S. Space Command and recently nominated General Jay Raymond,
another friend of this audience, to take the helm.
I urge the Senate to take up his
nomination. We’re ready to establish the new command shortly
thereafter. Part three is the Space Development Agency, what I call the
pacing element of our plan, which will architect our future space ecosystem.
The SDA will focus on developing and delivering
the next generation of space-based communications and earth observation, while
existing organizations continue their efforts – their current efforts.
Let me use satellite communications as an example of the value SDA is going to
bring.
First, consolidation of activity and integration
at scale. Currently, the U.S. military relies on a patchwork of Navy NUOS
and Army WGS and Air Force AHF military satellite programs with heavy lifting
done by spot market buys and commercial bandwidth from providers. The
result is we have deployed over 130 different types of wide band terminals, in
addition to narrow band and protected SATCOM terminals.
As we look to future architectures, we have a
once in a generation opportunity to consolidate and provide the department a
unified, multi-domain command and control system for the first time.
Second, SDA will lead a true national team
systems engineering effort. This is similar to the systems engineering
required for the Aegis system, or Navy’s strategic support program, which
integrates missiles, nuclear weapons, shore infrastructure, communications in a
submarine, all to produce a critical leg of our nuclear triad.
The space systems engineering challenge is
similar. The launch vehicle, the satellite bus, the payload. The
standards and protocols, the mesh network, the ground stations, the
terminals. All of it.
Third, SDA will harness the innovation and investment that’s taking place in commercial space. The revenue generated by the global space industry may increase to over $1.1 trillion by 2040. DOD must leverage the private sector investment, chasing this opportunity.
Our space R and D needs to include our own
research and development as well as other forms of R and D. I refer it to
as “rip off and deploy.” The rip off and deploy is the
commercial market innovations.
Finally, SDA will judiciously combine commercial
innovation with exquisite capabilities unique to DOD. These will include
sensors that can detect and track hypersonic threats, machine learning to make
sense of the enormous data we will collect, A.I. to link sensors and shooters,
and cyber-security designed in from the beginning.
The result will be a space architecture that is
resilient, responsive and ahead of the threat. These breakthroughs will
empower our forces with multi-domain command and control.
We are moving with purpose and speed to get
these plans in motion. Dr. Fred Kennedy is already at the helm of the
SDA. He will drive the SDA to explore, prototype and demonstrate systems
and architectures at a rapid pace that allows them to risk, try, fail, learn
and succeed.
We don’t intend to go at it alone. Our
objectives are too far-reaching to be achieved by any one entity, even one as
large as the Department of Defense. We need to leverage the asymmetric
advantages provided by American industry and our allies that no competitor can
match. Together, we’re going to maximize and protect space.
The end state is a national security space
architecture that is proliferated, affordable, persistent and provisioned for A.I.
When we’re done, it should look something like the cell phone network we have
on Earth. Different devices can connect and be upgraded, and subscribe to
the network. Allies and partners will work together to make this
happen.
This will go beyond technology
development. As with all warfighting domains, we will not fight
alone. We will have allies with us every step of the way, partnering with
our Space Force and stationed at Space Command.
The new space economy is American-led. Men
and women in this room and across the country are coming up with new ideas and
putting amazing new things into orbit. We want to be a part of
that.
Of course, the department is just one piece of
the puzzle. Congressmen Rogers and Cooper got us started on this path,
and I want to thank them for their leadership.
President Trump cast a bold vision. Vice
President Pence is driving change to achieve it through the National Space
Council. Secretary Ross, our NASA administrator have been pioneers as
they drive their organizations to go faster in developing space assets and
pursuing exploration.
As DOD accelerates our efforts, we will partner
closely with the interagency, industry, allies and partners. I look
forward to our continued engagement and partnership with Congress, as we work
together in crafting the F.Y. ’20 NDAA.
Today, we need to establish the Space Force to
protect our future. As President Trump has stated, our destiny beyond the
earth is not only a matter of national identity, but a matter of national
security.
Our competitors have made their choices.
Space is under threat. But we are ready today and we will remain ready as
these threats expand.
To those who want to partner with us, buckle up. We are seizing on a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. We are starting now because we refuse to fall behind. We can outpace our competitors and make it impossible for them to contest our dominance in space.
Illustration: Chinese anti-satellite weapon, Fengyun-1C (From youtube video)