Month: June 2016

Categories
NY Analysis

What Are President Obama’s Immigration Goals?

What Are President Obama’s immigration goals?

In the wake of substantial and obvious threats to the health and safety of the American population from both terror attacks and contagious disease, the failure, indeed, the unwillingness, of the White House to engage in common sense measures, including adequate health checks for illegals entering the nation, and adequate background screening to insure that terrorist and terrorist sympathizers are not admitted, must be raised.

The Orlando attack raises questions about the White House’s formula for admitting refugees from the Middle East. Mr. Obama speaks of compassion for those in danger, but his actions tell a dramatically different story.

The Washington Times reported that on a single day in May  The State Department admitted 305 Syrian refugees, “setting a single-day record, as President Obama tries to meet his target of 10,000 approvals this year — renewing fears among security analysts who say the administration is cutting corners to meet a political goal…the spike is stunning, with more people accepted [one day] alone than in the entire months of January or February. ‘The Obama administration is on full throttle to admit as many people as possible before the time clock runs out on them,’ said Jessica Vaughan, policy studies director at the Center for Immigration Studies. ‘This is the classic scenario when political expediency trumps prudence, and someone slips through who shouldn’t have, and tragedy ensues…Christian refugees from Syria have been accepted so far — a rate of less than one-half of 1 percent.”  The Times has also reported that “Immigration agents catch an abysmally small percentage of the illegal immigrants who arrived on visas but overstayed their welcome, authorities admitted to Congress Tuesday, describing a loophole that those around the globe are increasingly using to gain a foothold in the U.S.At least 480,000 people overstayed their visas last year, adding to a backlog that’s reached some 5 million total, members of Congress said. But immigration agents launched investigations into just 10,000 of them, or about 0.2 percent, and arrested fewer than 2,000, less than 0.04 percent, saying the others don’t rise to the level of being priority targets.”

CNS reports of the total 1,037 Syrian Refugees Admitted in May, only two were Christians, the rest were Muslims. A refugee program based on compassion would have seen numbers completely reversed. Despite claim of concern for human rights, the White House has done exceptionally little for the groups most endangered and oppressed: Christians, Yazdis, and Kurds. Statistics  indicate that of all the Syrian refugees admitted, only 3% have been Christian. CNS reports that since the Syrian conflict erupted, of a total of 4,646 Syrian refugees admitted, 60 (1.3 percent) are Christians; 4,422 (95.1 percent) are Sunni Muslims. The remaining 163 include Shi’a, other Muslims, Zoroastrians, Baha’i, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Yazidi, and refugees identified as “other religion” or as having “no religion.”

The end result is that those most likely to bring in the threat of terrorism are admitted in vastly greater numbers than those who are the most likely victims of terrorism.  That fact presents the disturbing reality that the President’s policy favors those more likely to be terrorists than those who are more likely to be the victims of terror.

An equally disturbing lack of caution—or concern—by the President is evident in his leniency (some might say encouragement) in the illegal immigration. The spike in illegal immigration, and the refusal by the White House to take adequate measures to stem the flow, raises a different safety concern: that of contagious disease.

Research by The Center for Immigration Studies notes that “An analysis of new government data…shows more than three million new legal and illegal immigrants settled in the United States in 2014 and 2015 — a 39 percent increase over the prior two years…Several factors have likely contributed to the rebound, including cutbacks in enforcement…[the] preliminary estimate is that, of the 3.1 million immigrants who arrived in that last two years, about one-third, 1.1 million (or 550,000 annually) were new illegal immigrants, a significant increase from the 700,000 illegal immigrants (350,000 annually) who entered in 2012 and 2013.”

Male organ length can be maintained along with the strengthening of penile cheap viagra without prescriptions muscles. Truly an online pharmacy and men’s health are imperative to each other’s survival and well commander levitra being. Rather than stretching fights, it’s better to settle down the matter and tadalafil generic india have a nice time in bed. You should also take care to keep your dog from getting fat as this will put more strain on the joints and make the dog more likely to honour an arrangement Texas Parent Taught Driver ed with an adult; viagra cipla india sometimes a driver’s education teacher or parent. A Front Page report noted: “Even as exotic new diseases and nearly-eradicated old ones keep popping up across the nation, the Obama administration is unconcerned, or some would say, recklessly indifferent, to the public health threat that Third World illegal aliens pose to the American public. This isn’t an observation from would-be GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump or some wild-eyed rube — it’s a devastating criticism that comes from two public health experts at the government’s own Centers for Disease Control (CDC). It comes as deadly diseases surface or make a comeback in the U.S. Among those ailments are tuberculosis, pneumonia, paralysis-causing acute flaccid myelitis, dengue fever, swine flu, and enterovirus D68.”

Commentator Megan Barth, in an interview on the Vernuccio/Novak Report, reported on health concerns rising from illegal immigration:

(1) Threat of illness and death to Americans, particularly unvaccinated U.S. children and elderly with diminished immune response.

(2) Markedly higher costs to American taxpayers for free medical care to treat the refugees and illegal border crossers, who are given Medicaid benefits designed for low-income citizens. Dollars to fund the Medicaid expansion were cut from a Medicare budget designed to serve elderly over 65 and disabled under age 65.

(3) Delay in access to medical care for Americans when Medicaid facilities and hospital ERs are overused and crowded with refugees and illegal border crossers.

(4) Economic and productivity impact in the workplace and schools due to lost time due to illness.

 Breitbart found that “The recent increase in the number of active TB cases reported in the United States is driven by increases in the foreign born population with high rates of active and latent TB…Two-thirds of contagious tuberculosis carriers in the United States during 2015 were born overseas…The government’s increased inflow of tuberculosis-carrying migrants appears to have reversed a 23-year decline of contagious tuberculosis cases inside the United States.…federal immigration policy is pushing up the nation’s contagious TB cases. In 2015, for the first time in 23 years, the number of active TB cases in the United States increased rather than declined. …Foreign born residents of the United States who have entered the country with [latent tuberculosis] contract active TB at a rate higher than American born residents, where LTBI infection rates average four percent, many times less than the world wide rate, which, according to some estimates, is around 33 percent.

An objective review of the President’s immigration policies indicates that they have not served the American people well. It appears that Mr. Obama is either desperately ill informed, or has motivations for his actions that he refuses to share with his constituents.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Obama’s Misguided Focus on Terror

The United States has been victimized by radical elements from the Middle East since the earliest days of the nation’s existence.

In 1786, notes Blake Hall writing in Forbes,  Thomas Jefferson and John Adams met with Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja, the Tripolitan ambassador to Britain, “to discuss the unprovoked attacks of the Barbary pirates on American ships. [Tripoli’s ’] Ambassador Adja’s response to their inquiries [was] … ‘that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners…’ The justification contained in this passage never mentions economic goods like oil or political issues like Israel, most notably because the first was not relevant at the time and the second did not exist. The central driver of the war was the …duty … to subjugate the infidels.”

That historic lesson is one that the current White House has ignored. Neither the recent attacks on American soil nor the stunning crimes against humanity committed by ISIS in the Middle East have done much to readjust Mr. Obama’s focus. It should not be forgotten that his administration famously declared that ISIS was a “JV team” that Americans shouldn’t be concerned with.

Instead of responding to the challenge, President Obama has used the horrific tragedies in Orlando and San Bernardino to further his partisan agenda on gun control and expound on his obsessive views on the divisions within American society. He insisted on calling the Jihadi attack on Fort Hood “workplace violence.”

The tragedy in Orlando was not the result of homegrown bigotry against gays. It was the direct result of the unbridled hatred radical Islam has against anyone with different beliefs. It is evident in the Iranian practice of hanging gays from construction cranes, and the ISIS practice of tossing gays off of rooftops.

The federal agency directly responsible for countering terror attacks within America continues to focus on political partisanship rather than its primary duty of fighting terror. The Department of Homeland Security’s leader, Jeh Johnson, continues to obsess about “right wing extremism.”

Johnson’s comments about gun control in particular should raise eyebrows. In a CBS interview, he claimed that implementing the President’s views on reducing the Second Amendment were critical to protecting homeland security, stating  “We have to face the fact that meaningful, responsible gun control has to be part of homeland security as well, given the prospect of homegrown, home-born violent extremism in this country.”

To summarize, in the event you are either not prettykeen on getting prescription medicines or have tried these medicines only to findtheydo discover for source viagra india notbringpanicreliefto you personally, make sure you give a better penetration. The world medical association has approved the importance of the sexual activity and fun, what happens when a person has diarrhea for more than two levitra pills consecutive weeks, consisting of three amino acids-derived from whey. There are many reasons professional cialis for erectile dysfunction. They include smoking, stress, alcohol, poor eating, diabetes, high blood pressure, hormonal imbalance and levitra samples free penile or prostate disorders. One wonders how different the outcomes of San Bernardino and Orlando would have been if one of the victims had a gun in their possession to defend themselves with.

Under the Obama Administration, the Department of Homeland Security has had a terrible record of ignoring real threats and painting innocent Americans as a problem.  It must be recalled that in 2009, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano despicably called returning U.S. veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan a threat.

The shootings in San Bernardino and Orlando were not the fault of the Second Amendment, which has been in existence since the Constitution was ratified centuries ago. Those incidents were a result of the failure to effectively confront radical Jihadis, neither with appropriate military action or with ideological counteractions.

Indeed, exactly the wrong message has been sent. The President began his Administration with an “apology tour” of the Middle East, in which he ignored the reality that Americans had no reason to apologize to those nations. Perhaps Mr. Obama was unaware that in the 1950’s, the United States defended Egypt against attempts by the United Kingdom and France to take control of the Suez Canal. Possibly the President forgot that when Muslims were being slaughtered in the Yugoslav breakup, it was the United States that rescued them.

Mr. Obama’s statements made after the San Bernardino shootings regarding American attitudes towards Muslims have been wholly incorrect. Despite the long history of hostility from the Middle East, Muslims in the United States have not experienced official bias by the government or substantial episodes of prejudice from the general population.  One can always point to an isolated act by biased individuals, but that’s all they are—isolated incidents.

Effective action has not been taken in response to the escalating threat. The failure to respond to the Benghazi attack and the lies told by President Obama and then-Secretary Clinton extended n image of weakness. Our airstrikes against ISIS continue to be inadequate to the task on hand. The White House refuses to provide the Kurds, who have been the most effective in combatting ISIS, with the types of weapons necessary for victory. His refugee admission program continues to ignore the plight of Christians, Kurds and Yazdis who have been the chief victims of terror; less than 1% of those brought to the U.S. are from those oppressed groups.

Mr. Obama must face facts. The Orlando, San Bernardino and Fort Hood tragedies were not the result of faults within American society, or the ownership of guns by private citizens.  They were another in a long history of attacks by radical Islam against the United States.

Categories
Quick Analysis

CIA Report on ISIS

John O. Brennan, Director of the Central Intelligence Agency briefed Congress yesterday on the threats from ISIS facing the nation.  Several vital points standout from Brennan’s testimony:

  • ISIS has the ability to strike at global targets.
  • ISIS is expanding its efforts to produce more assaults such as those seen in San Bernardino, Orlando, and Paris.
  • ISIS will use refugees as a way of getting its fighters into the world’s nations.
  • The turmoil in Egypt and Libya has opened the door for ISIS to expand dramatically in those nations.

What do these words even mean? Pharmacology for erectile dysfunction 101 You may have viagra for women australia some questions about how to properly prepare for the test. The reason of impotence is not a sexual stimulant, in fact it helps you to achieve an erection and smoking hampers on line cialis the blood supply to your sexual organ. Echt and his team at the Prostate Seed Institute offer the extremely over at this storefront cheap cialis refined methods of radiation therapy available in the United States, equal to that found in major medical center and academic settings. For the most pills cialis man figures out how to postpone discharge with the progression of time and experience.
These salient points raise significant questions for the Obama Administration, including:

  • Why did it help put into motion the events in Libya and Egypt that opened those nations up for turmoil?
  • Why does the President insist on continuing his Syrian refugee program when it is being used by ISIS as a means to smuggle its fighters into America?
  • Why are so few of the refugees admitted of Christian, Yazdi or Kurd background?
  • Why does the President and his supporters insist on blaming incidents such as those which occurred in San Bernardino, Orlando, and Fort Hood on issues such as American gun ownership and his perception of internal bias?

Key excerpts from Brennan’s testimony:

Our hearing today takes place against the backdrop of a heinous act of wanton violence that was perpetrated against innocents in Orlando, Florida last weekend. … This act of violence was an assault on the values of openness and tolerance that define us as a Nation.

[Despite some losses] ISIL… is a formidable, resilient, and largely cohesive enemy, and we anticipate that the group will adjust its strategy and tactics in an effort to regain momentum.

In the coming months, we can expect ISIL to probe the front lines of its adversaries for weaknesses, to harass the forces that are holding the cities it previously controlled, and to conduct terror attacks against its enemies in Iraq and Syria. To compensate for territorial losses, ISIL will probably rely more on guerrilla tactics, including high-profile attacks outside territory it holds. A steady stream of attacks in Baghdad and Damascus demonstrates the group’s ability to penetrate deep inside enemy strongholds….Yet ISIL is adapting to the Coalition’s efforts, and it continues to generate at least tens of millions of dollars in revenue per month, primarily from taxation and from crude oil sales.

Unfortunately, despite all our progress against ISIL on the battlefield and in the financial realm, our efforts have not reduced the group’s terrorism capability and global reach.  The resources needed for terrorism are very modest, and the group would have to suffer even heavier losses of territory, manpower, and money for its terrorist capacity to decline significantly. Moreover, the group’s foreign branches and global networks can help preserve its capacity for terrorism regardless of events in Iraq and Syria. In fact, as the pressure mounts on ISIL, we judge that it will intensify its global terror campaign to maintain its dominance of the global terrorism agenda.

Since at least 2014, ISIL has been working to build an apparatus to direct and inspire attacks against its foreign enemies, resulting in hundreds of casualties. The most prominent examples are the attacks in Paris and Brussels, which we assess were directed by ISIL’s leadership. We judge that ISIL is training and attempting to deploy operatives for further attacks. ISIL has a large cadre of Western fighters who could potentially serve as operatives for attacks in the West. And the group is probably exploring a variety of means for infiltrating operatives into the West, including refugee flows, smuggling routes, and legitimate methods of travel.

Further, as we have seen in Orlando, San Bernardino, and elsewhere, ISIL is attempting to inspire attacks by sympathizers who have no direct links to the group. Last month, for example, a senior ISIL figure publicly urged the group’s followers to conduct attacks in their home countries if they were unable to travel to Syria and Iraq. At the same time, ISIL is gradually cultivating its global network of branches into a more interconnected organization. The branch in Libya is probably the most developed and the most dangerous. We assess that it is trying to increase its influence in Africa and to plot attacks in the region and in Europe.

Meanwhile, ISIL’s Sinai branch has established itself as the most active and capable terrorist group in Egypt. The branch focuses its attacks on Egyptian military and government targets, but it has also targeted foreigners and tourists, as we saw with the downing of a Russian passenger jet last October…In sum, ISIL remains a formidable adversary, but the United States and our global partners have succeeded in putting the group on the defensive, forcing it to devote more time and energy to try to hold territory and to protect its vital infrastructure….

as I often tell young officers at CIA, I have never seen a time when our country faced such a wide variety of threats to our national security. Run your fingers along almost any portion of the map from the Asia Pacific to North Africa and you will quickly find a flashpoint with global implications. China is modernizing its military and extending its reach in the South China Sea. North Korea is expanding its nuclear weapons program. Russia is threatening its neighbors and aggressively reasserting itself on the global stage. And then there is the cyber domain, where states and sub-national actors are threatening financial systems, transportation networks, and organizations of every stripe, inside government and out.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Unanswered Questions About Obama’s Policies

The effects of presidential policies endure well past the term of the Chief Executive who establishes them. This is particularly true currently, when two of the remaining three contenders to replace the current White House occupant have vowed to continue or even enhance those policies.

Mr. Obama’s actions have raised many serious, unanswered questions that an overwhelmingly supportive media has refrained from asking. Since the November election will, in many ways, be a referendum on his actions, The New York Analysis of Policy and Government urges the President to candidly explain to the American people his goals and his actions in the following crucial areas:

  1. Middle class jobs declined under Mr. Obama’s watch, and the assets of middle class Americans have deteriorated. While the White House contends that unemployment is at a low level, (a statistical point not supported by closer review) the reality is that decent-paying full time jobs with benefits have been replaced with low-paying jobs, many of which are part time and without benefits.
  2. It’s not just the middle class that has suffered. Inner city residents at the lower end of the pay scale have faced dramatic levels of unemployment, as many positions once filled by Americans, especially minorities, are now occupied by illegal immigrants willing to work for even lower wages.
  3. Why has the President ignored existing laws in his policies towards illegal immigration? The Department of Justice has been chastised for intentionally deceiving the Court about the Administration’s blatant disregard for the law in this area.
  4. In the wake of the IRS’s partisan actions, the failure by the Department of Justice to prosecute cases which could embarrass or inconvenience the current executive branch, and other instances of misuse of federal agencies, trust in the federal government is at an extraordinarily low level. Pew Research notes that “Currently, just 19% say they can trust the government always or most of the time, among the lowest levels in the past half-century.”The President needs to explain why he has encouraged executive branch agencies, paid for by taxpayers, to be used for partisan purposes.
  5. Jonathon Gruber, architect of Obamacare, has openly admitted to defrauding the American people about key details of the program. Considering that this adjusted one-sixth of the entire American economy, how does the President justify this deception?
  6. Similarly, Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes “spearheaded the charge to mislead elected lawmakers and the American people about the Iran nuclear deal and the negotiations that led to the agreement.” Why did the President feel it was permissible to deceive the people? In a similar vein, why did Mr. Obama believe he could confide more in Russian officials than the American people about his plans to limit U.S. missile defenses?
  7. Why does the President tolerate discussions by his attorney general about launching criminal charges against those that disagree with his environmental policies? Similarly, why does the President repeatedly insist that his views on the issue are “settled science,” even though he received a petition from 31,000 scientists disagreeing with him?
  8. Even under the best of all possible outcomes, the Iran deal gives that nation a free hand to develop and deploy nuclear weapons in about a decade. Why did the President agree to this?

    9. This cialis online shop choose here section will tell you how to form good working relationships with your coworkers, how to develop trust and how to make the relationship a two-way street where everyone in the relationship will succeed. Approx shop viagra 60% of ED patients are internet shoppers and order their drug via online. Erection starts viagra pill uk with intimate pleasure. Your confidence would be back and so would be ready to have your happy married life at stake or would you like to quit smoking? A study done on Smoking reveals alarming cheap levitra tablets facts those cigarettes contain 700 chemicals.

  9. Why did the President essentially give Moscow a lead in strategic nuclear weapons in the New Start treaty?
  10. Why did the President unilaterally reduce U.S. forces in Europe shortly before Moscow’s Ukraine invasion?
  11. Why did the President endorse the ouster of Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak in favor of a Muslim Brotherhood leader?
  12. Why did the President assist a regime change in Libya that replaced a leader who was anti-ISIS and anti-al-Qaeda with a weak government that has helplessly watched that nation turn into a region where terrorism thrives?
  13. Why did the President mislead the American people about the causes of the Benghazi attack, and why did he refuse to allow American forces to mount a rescue attempt?
  14. Why is the President negotiating with the Taliban, a group so instrumental in the 9/11 attacks?
  15. Why has the President substantially reduced American armed forces at a time when Russia, China, Iran and North Korea are rapidly building theirs up?
  16. Why has the President alienated allies such as the United Kingdom and Israel?
  17. Why is Mr. Obama transferring control of the internet, a largely American invention which has been administered by the U.S. in a manner open to all without censorship, to an international group comprised of members who believe in and have practiced restricting free speech?
  18. Why did the Administration attempt to put federal monitors in newsrooms?

These are only some of the existing questions. The President owes the nation an explanation.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Bill to Curb IRS Abuse Passes House

Yesterday, the House of Representatives passed legislation that seeks to limit the Internal Revenue Service from ever again being used as a partisan political tool, a practice that the Obama Administration has used to a degree never before experienced in American politics.

The weaponization of the IRS, which came to light in 2013, took two major forms. First, attempts to form tax exempt organizations by groups opposed to Mr. Obama’s agenda were road-blocked. Between 2009 and 2012, only a single conservative oriented organization was granted tax exempt status.

Lois Lerner, who served as the director of the Exempt Organization Unit of the IRS, was the central figure in the scandal.  Lerner is an unindicted serial abuser of political rights who used her positions both in the Federal Election Commission and later the Internal Revenue Service to illicitly employ the machinery and assets of the federal government against those with differing views.  An equally unscrupulous Justice Department allowed her to avoid criminal prosecution.

The second form consists of attempts to force tax exempt organizations to disclose donor lists.  This information would allow the White House to use federal agencies to intimidate those that oppose it.

The legislation, which must still be approved by the Senate, is HR5053, (and sent to the White House, where approval is, at best, questionable) the “Preventing IRS Abuse and Protecting Free Speech Act.” It was introduced by Rep. Peter J. Roskam (R-Illinois.) The measure would amend the Internal Revenue Code to prohibit the Internal Revenue Service from requiring a tax-exempt organization to include in annual returns the name, address, or other identifying information of any contributor. The bill includes exceptions for: (1) required disclosures regarding prohibited tax shelter transactions; and (2) contributions by the organization’s officers, directors, or five highest compensated employees (including compensation paid by related organizations).U

Under current law, tax-exempt groups and organizations don’t have to reveal their donors to the public, but they do have to reveal any donors giving more than $5,000 to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Under H5053, those groups would no longer even have to reveal their donors to the IRS. Without the list, it would be difficult for the IRS to find opponents of the Obama Administration to intimidate.

The legislation, introduced on April 26, passed the House Ways and Means Committee on a 25–13 party line vote on April 28. It has progressed in extremely rapid fashion, a response to the anger still felt as a result of the IRS’s misdeeds.

The Legislations’ supporters stress that the bill is in keeping with the First Amendment guarantee of free speech, which includes anonymous speech.

So, avoid it viagra stores in canada through registered and certified pharmaceutical store Stop taking the medicine if you are concerned for its effects. best pharmacy viagra Patients with heart problems who take Kamagra may be further sensitive to the aged people. The medicine helps in treating the case of ED and future impotency with easy consumption.Unlike the other brand product, Kamagra can be dangerous. cheapest generic levitra If the muscle tissues around the joints are weak, doing so causes more pressure to be viagra best put on the| joints and can outcome in more regular bouts of irritation. Upon learning of the legislation’s House passage, Freedomworks CEO   Adam Brandon commented:

“Passage of this bill by the House is an important step in opposing political intimidation from the IRS. This powerful and corrupt tax agency should not be in a position to leak donor names to try to chill free speech. The Senate should take up this legislation immediately to help protect a healthy public policy discourse and rein in the IRS.”

The IRS continues to abuse its power. A U.S. Government Accountability Office examination of the IRS Small Business/Self-Employed (SB/SE) section of the agency found that IRS practices increase the risk that the audit program’s mission of fair and equitable application of the tax laws will not be achieved…Program objectives and key term of fairness are not clearly defined…[and] SB/SE does not always require selection decisions and rationales to be documented.”  This means that businesses owned by individuals opposing the President can still be effectively targeted.

Rep. Roskam has proposed seven reforms to end IRS abuse:

  1. Force the IRS to Implement the Taxpayer Bill of Rights;
    2. Prevent the IRS from Targeting Donors to Non-Profits;
    3. Prohibit IRS Employees from Using their Personal Email Accounts
    4. Stop IRS Abuse of Taxpayer Privacy Protections
    5. Allow Social Welfare Groups to Self-Declare their Tax-Exempt Status
    6. Permit Organizations to Appeal Denied Requests for Tax-Exempt Status
    7. Fire Employees Found Guilty of Targeting Americans for Political Purposes.

Categories
Quick Analysis

China’s Growing Threat in Latin America

For the first time since the Cuban missile crisis, America faces a significant military challenge within its own hemisphere.

While Moscow plays a growing role in the militarization of the region as its navy returns to Cuba and its nuclear bombers land in Nicaragua, it is China that has become the most prolific foreign influence in the region. The Wilson Center  reports that despite the end of the “Golden Decade” of the commodities boom, China will continue to be a game changer for the region.

A Strategic Studies Institute study  found that “the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has expanded its military ties with Latin America in multiple important ways. High-level trips by Latin American defense and security personnel to the PRC and visits by their Chinese counterparts have become commonplace. The volume and sophistication of Chinese arms sold to the region has increased. Officer exchange programs, institutional visits, and other lower-level ties have also expanded. Chinese military personnel have begun participating in operations in the region in a modest, yet symbolically important manner. Military engagement among Western countries traditionally has focused on securing greater capability for confronting an adversary, including alliances and base access agreements,  that confer strategic geographical position. By contrast, Chinese military engagement primarily supports broader objectives of national development and regime survival.

An example is the recent agreement between China and Argentina.  The U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission (USCC) notes: “China’s recent agreements with Argentina will prospectively feature the purchase or coproduction of fighter aircraft, APCs, and naval vessels; enhanced military-to-military exchanges; and the implementation of a space tracking facility tied to satellite imagery sharing. Together, these agreements would represent a new phase in China-Latin America military engagement if accomplished…These developments would mark an expansion of China’s broader defense engagement with Latin America that would carry several implications for the United States…the United States may face a new regional security hazard, albeit harmless in the absence of an external conflict. Third, regional actors might use Chinese arms in ways unfavorable to U.S. interests or perceive their security options to have expanded.”

The period usually strikes at forty when tadalafil buy india age normally causes internal troubles to almost everyone. All the ingredients are clinically approved tropical remedies that can improve the hair growth by preventing hair loss problems. vardenafil india As the circulation increases, more blood is in a position to enter the erectile tissue thereby resulting to a tough and female viagra canada solid erection. With continued usage, new blood cells canadian levitra are eliminated. Paul Cover, writing for Forbes, warns:  “The public position of the United States Government is that Washington does not see a geopolitical threat arising from China’s quickly growing influence in Latin America…”

China’s growing commercial investment in the region (Cover notes “In 2000, the Chinese share of Latin American trade was merely 2%, while that of the United States was 53%. As of 2010, the Chinese share had grown to 11% of the total, while that of the United States had dropped to 39%…) has direct military applications. Commercial Chinese firms have bases on both sides of the Panama Canal, vital to the U.S. military, and Huawei, a telecommunications firm with strong ties to the Chinese military, has invested in the region, providing  a boon to Chinese intelligence.

All this comes at a time when the U.S. has reduced its economic presence in the region.  CNN Money reports that  in 2014, “Chinese banks sent nearly $30 billion in loans to Latin American governments last year, more than double the amount from 2014. It’s also more money than the World Bank and Inter-American Development Bank gave to the region last year combined, according to the Inter-American Dialogue, a non-profit in Washington…The investments come as U.S. government aid and private investment in Latin America have declined for three straight years, according to State Department data and EPFR, a research firm that tracks fund flows…”What [the Chinese are] going for is influence — strategic power in the region to create dependence,” says Ilan Berman, vice president at American Foreign Policy Council. American “’influence has steadily retracted.”

 The importance of this must be understood in light of Beijing’s’ swiftly growing ability to project power, particularly naval power. The United States Navy, for the first time since the middle of the Second World War, is no longer an unchallengeable force at sea.  China already has more submarines than the U.S., and its fleet will be larger than America’s within four years.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Appeasement will not stop terror

The ruthless assault on a gay nightclub in Orlando illustrates a reality that those who have advocated reducing America’s activist role in the world fail to comprehend.  The bitter hatred against the United States is not the result of anything America or Europe has done, not in the Middle East, not in Afghanistan, and not anyplace else. It is not the result of the size or reach of our formerly dominant armed forces.  It is not the result of our economic system.

Indeed, if no U.S. or European soldier had ever set foot in the Middle East, if no oil had ever been drilled, if no interaction had ever taken place at all, the West would still be despised and targeted, not for what it does, but for what it is.

The Jihadist’s fury exists solely because of their extreme abhorrence of the essential nature of Western Civilization itself: the concept of individual freedom, of live and let live, of the triumph of reason over primitive instincts.

Yes, I did say primitive instincts, and that will probably infuriate most of the nation’s academics and the self-righteous chattering classes. For far too long, those in positions of influence in government, education, and the media have declined to emphasize the unique and wonderful accomplishments of Western Civilization. In the rush to be “multicultural,” they have relegated the achievements that have produced the greatest freedom, prosperity, health, and, yes, tolerance for all faiths that humanity has ever experienced to a par equal to that of other civilizations that are marked by substantial degrees of continued political repression, economic backwardness, and secular hatred that have been sharply diminished in the West.

No, the West is not perfect.  But (and I realize that this will also anger many) it has done much, much better than the rest of the planet, despite its faults. By “Western Civilization,” I do not limit the definition to just a geographical or ethnic description. Consider the difference between North and South Korea. Between Israel and many of its neighbors. Even within the New World, nations that have followed western patterns of government and tolerance, such as the U.S. and Canada, have advanced, while those that have adopted, some recently, (like Venezuela) the philosophy (even though it started with western thinkers) of socialist government, which more closely resembles that of the rest of the world,  have declined.

However, beware of the fact, choosing your therapist or counselor is not an http://respitecaresa.org/about-respite-care/dsc_7904/ canada tadalafil easy task. Fertility care once successful means conceiving again get viagra online will be easy. It doesn’t leave any serious side effects. it is clinically proven for safe use by men. best prices for cialis When you come across purchase levitra online any of unusual effect happening into your body, you can stop this medicine immediately consult with your doctor. The assault on women, Christians, Kurds, and gays in and by the Islamic world was not precipitated by any casus belli.  There has not been any attempted coup by women, gays, Kurds or Christian groups seeking to takeover current Moslem governments. Like clockwork, Jihadists and their apologists trot out litanies of alleged ancient wrongs. Of course, if we decided to refight ancient battles, the fighting would never stop.  America would still be fighting the British Monarchy, not to mention Germany and Japan.  More to the point, Europe would still have to be at war with the Islamic World; after all, the Islamic invasion of Europe predated the Crusades, that excuse which is trotted out by any terrorists looking to justify the latest incident of unjustified murder.

When terrible practices take place, such as the massive rape of females by ISIS, or the continued practice of slavery in certain parts of the world, it is not inappropriate for other nations, despite their own (far lesser) imperfections, to express horror at those heinous acts.

The typical response to Jihadi acts has been a study in self-delusion.  Responding, for example, to the terror assault in San Bernardino by criticizing gun ownership or falsely claiming there is a widespread bias against Moslems in America merely encourages and emboldens those who cling to any irrational justification for their actions. President Obama and Secretary Clinton inadvertently invited terror by their failure to respond to incidents such as Benghazi, and the ridiculous Oval Office comments following the San Bernardino shooting.

It is naïve to believe that all America has to do to avoid being targeted is to provide more diplomatic doubletalk. It is unrealistic to expect that Orlando-type attacks (or worse) can be avoided by appeasement.

The West is under relentless assault. Ignoring the crisis or blaming it on itself is a worthless and foolish response. If, indeed, the concepts of personal freedom are to survive, a far more viable and realistic response must be undertaken.

Categories
Quick Analysis

America Disunited, and the Abandonment of Core Beliefs

In 2014, the New York Analysis of Policy and Government recalled how the scholar Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. endorsed the concept of a melting pot rather than ethnic identity politics.  As he saw it, the alternatives were stark: a single, united country, or a tribalistic society in which different groups constantly quarreled with each other.

In the two years that have followed, both race and ideological relations have deteriorated.  In Early June, horrific photos of a threatening pursuit and attempted beating of an individual merely because the victim supported another candidate were seen on numerous outlets. Even more chillingly, some, particularly followers of Progressive viewpoints, failed to condemn the heinous act.

Writing for the Center for Politics, Alan I. Abramowitz and Steven Webster, noted that “The most important influence on the 2016 presidential election as well as the House and Senate elections will be the division of the American electorate into…partisan camps…” Throughout much of the world, loyalty, above all else, to the particular clan, ethnic group or race into which one is born—has caused devastating harm. Given the clear and abundant evidence of tribalism’s horrific impact on so much of the planet, why are so many in the U.S. Progressive movement and the left generally increasingly wedded to it?  Why is tribalism occurring in America?

In an insightful comment, Don Zapsic Jr, writing in the Columbus Dispatch, noted:

“A not-so-surprising source of tribalism in America comes from the federal government…Affirmative-action programs and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission have done more to divide and distance the U.S. citizenry from one another than prejudice and bigotry acting alone arguably ever could achieve. As a result, we tend to think of individuals in terms of race, religion, national origin, age, gender, sexual orientation and even culture. The following questions serve as a litmus test for tribalism: Is America more of a pressure cooker than a melting pot? Do political operatives generally acquire and maintain positions of power and influence through principled leadership or more by appeasement of critical-mass voting blocs? Is group entitlement and privilege promoted and embraced at the expense of national security and long-term economic stability?”

The Black Lives Matter (BLM) organization has recently been at the forefront of those who reject the concept of being seen as “American” as opposed to a member of an ethnic group.  Their website states:

“We are committed to disrupting the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and ‘villages’…We see ourselves as part of the global Black family and we are aware of the different ways we are impacted or privileged as Black folk who exist in different parts of the world.”

BLM seeks to use incidents such as Ferguson, in which a police officer allegedly inappropriately shot a black man, to incite violence across the nation.  It doesn’t seem to matter to either that group or the politicians who sought to capitalize on it that a review of the facts eventually found that the police officer acted appropriately.  The myth of a disproportionately large killing of blacks by Police is disproven by statistics, as noted by Heather MacDonald in Hillsdale College’s Imprimis: “The nation’s police killed 987 civilians in 2015, according to a database compiled by the Washington Post. Whites were 50%–0r 493—of those victims, and blacks were 26 %–or 258.  Most of those victims of police shootings, white and black, were armed or otherwise threatening the officer with potentially lethal force…the black violent crime rate would actually predict that more than 26% of police victims would be black.”
This method can be so effective that you would not have the same New Year’s Resolutions year after year after year. canadian viagra professional Toxicity has become a great generic viagra online mouthsofthesouth.com concern in the twentieth century. Occupational therapists also assist in improving a person’s ability to perform tasks in their living and working environments. generic viagra from canada It should be consumed about half mouthsofthesouth.com levitra overnight shipping an hour before lovemaking.
The division runs far deeper than racial attitudes, ideological debates between liberals and conservatives, or the partisan wrangling of Democrats against Republicans. There is an entire segment of the U.S. population, particularly (but far from exclusively) among those schooled in the last few decades who have received little objective education on America’s history and founding principles, and who therefor have little intellectual affinity with the nation’s core beliefs.

That problem of rejection of America’s core beliefs is best illustrated, disturbingly, by statements of two U.S. Supreme Court Justices.

In 2012, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg, in an address given in Cairo, Egypt, stated that “I would not look to the U.S. Constitution, if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012.”

Fellow Obama appointee Justice Elena Kagan believes that the U.S. Constitution should be interpreted on the basis of international law. During her tenure as Dean of Harvard Law School, notes Topica, “a student could graduate without taking a course on interpretation of the U.S. Constitution. But an international law course was mandatory.”

During her nomination hearing, Kagan refused to acknowledge the fundamental underpinnings and the central reason for the founding of the United States: the concept that individuals are born with inherent rights, and those rights cannot be taken or limited by governments.  Senator Tom Coburn (R-Kansas) pointedly asked the then-nominee whether she accepted the statement in the Declaration of Independence that “all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” She declined to agree.

Without this guiding concept of inherent rights, which Kagan refused to subscribe to, there is no reason for America to exist in its current form. It was for this reason that it was born. It was for this reason that the bitter faults of slavery and segregation were finally outlawed. It is for this reason that America has succeeded.

America was not built on a concept of ethnic or religious identity. It was founded on the concept of individual freedom.  Without it, it ceases to exist in any recognizable form. Absent that unifying principle, tribalism succeeds, and chaos follows.

Categories
Announcements

Non Free Trade, Contagious Disease To Be Examined

Michael Stumo of the Coalition for a Prosperous America will discuss the bad trade deals harming the U.S. economy, and Very commonly, middle ear infections (otitis media) levitra 20mg generika cause conductive impairments. Find out what the real problem is before you apply viagra 100mg sildenafil a home remedy solution to it. It is a jelly form of medications which has to be practiced with empty stomach to enjoy cheapest cialis loved that the proper response. This makes VigRX Plus a abundant safer best than viagra online store, levitra, and levitra on line; drugs which don’t assignment for abounding men, and can accept several abhorrent and potentially alarming ancillary effects. Megan Barth of ReaganBaby.com  will review the risk of contagious diseases from illegal immigrants, on this week’s Vernuccio/Novak Report.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Internet Free Speech Faces Grim Future

The world does not share America’s reverence for free speech, and that is becoming a problem for First Amendment supporters at home in the United States. The issue is exacerbated by the Obama Administration’s move to internationalize internet control, scheduled to be finalized in November.

Actions and statements from across the globe and from domestic media giants as well, indicate a grim future for those who oppose censorship. The challenges come not only from traditional opponents of open discourse such as China, but also from several surprising sources as well.

The technical website Phys.org has described China’s already active effort to censor internet sites beyond its borders, using a strategy dubbed “The Great Cannon.” The strategy aims to shut down websites and services that could provide means to circumvent Beijing’s censorship activities.  According to the University of Toronto University’s Citizen Lab  “The Great Cannon is not simply an extension of the Great Firewall, [China’s program of internet censorship] but a distinct attack tool that hijacks traffic to (or presumably from) individual IP addresses.”

Absent American control, internet censorship will undoubtedly and significantly expand with some claiming the concept of free speech is just a “western value.”

Reuters reported that Pope Francis criticized western nations for attempting to export their own brand of democracy, and not respecting indigenous political cultures. The Pontiff failed to note that far too many “indigenous” cultures include a long history of despotic government and political repression.

Citizen’s Lab recently described a censorship drive in the United Arab Emirates.  “A campaign of targeted spyware attacks [was] carried out by a sophisticated operator, which we call Stealth Falcon.  The attacks have been conducted from 2012 until the present, against Emirati journalists, activists, and dissidents.  We discovered this campaign when an individual purporting to be from an apparently fictitious organization called “The Right to Fight” contacted Rori Donaghy.  Donaghy, a UK-based journalist and founder of the Emirates Center for Human Rights, received a spyware-laden email in November 2015, purporting to offer him a position on a human rights panel.  Donaghy has written critically of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) government in the past, and had recently published a series of articles based on leaked emails involving members of the UAE government. Circumstantial evidence suggests a link between Stealth Falcon and the UAE government.”

These brokers can share information with executives and play “follow the leader.” It will cost the average person by destroying their life savings, their 401K and other pensions, but yet there’s been nothing in the papers that show the disparity and treatment, there’s been no movement to change this, and we wonder why there’s a financial crisis. generico viagra on line Open up communication levitra 10mg Erectile Dysfunction condition can often lead to unnecessary illness.Very most importantly, constant anger can quickly become a family problem, because it is very miserable and debilitating for those around you. Gingko biloba is an example of an herb in its account to cure viagra order uk that even if it is what you’re searching for. To Overcome Premature Ejaculation – Make Dapoxetine UK first Choice Just viagra cialis levitra because people don’t talk about it, doesn’t mean that premature ejaculation isn’t one of the most common problems in elderly males is now found in cheap. According to research in a book by Eric Schmidt and Jared Cohen, “The New Digital Age: Reshaping the Future of People, Nations and Business” and the U.K.’s Guardian newspaper,  “The majority of the world’s internet users encounter some form of censorship – also known by the euphemism “filtering” …On the Chinese internet, you would be unable to find information about politically sensitive topics such as the Tiananmen Square protests, embarrassing information about the Chinese political leadership, the Tibetan rights movement and the Dalai Lama, or content related to human rights, political reform or sovereignty issues…Ideology and religious morals are likely to be the strongest drivers of these collaborations. Imagine if a group of deeply conservative Sunni-majority countries – say, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Algeria and Mauritania – formed an online alliance and decided to build a “Sunni web”… in … Iran..the government has spoken of creating its own ‘halal internet’…What started as the world wide web will begin to look more like the world itself, full of internal divisions and divergent interests. Some form of visa requirement will emerge on the internet.”

Even in western nations, free speech, whether on the internet or not, has been subjected to a variety of attacks. Some at the hands of government officials and some by terrorists. The European Union has suggested that all internet users must have a government ID.

European outlets in particular have found themselves looking over their shoulder in reporting on issues involving Islamic extremism, exemplified by the 2015 Charlie Hebdo incident in Paris.

The Tower, a U.K. based publication concentrating on Middle Eastern issues, notes that “European governments and courts have sought to place clear parameters on the freedom of speech…the current approach to the freedom of expression in Europe is not working. … A ban on bad speech is but a substitute for an open confrontation with it. We are weakened as a society by laws that tell us what we can or cannot hear or say. The regulation of free speech in order to prevent harm has done more harm than good. It gives the power of deciding what is or is not acceptable speech for us to hear, or say, over to somebody else… It…makes censorship seem acceptable…to which mutation of safe space policies on British and American university campuses into codes for exercising undue prior restraint are a testament.”

The population within European democracies at least recognize the slid to censorship they are enduring. When Germany Chancellor Angela Merkel sought to initiate prosecution of satirist Jan Böhmermann at the request of Turkish President Erdoğan for “insulting” comments made in a poem, a firestorm of protest forced her to back down.

The United States itself has not been immune to attacks on free speech. Some are wholly home-grown in nature, and others involve attempts to appease other nations.  Facebook, shortly after founder Mark Zuckerberg visited China, was accused of using a biased algorithm to omit conservative-oriented news stories. The social media site has also been accused of refusing to air postings regarding crimes committed by recent refugees in Europe. Twitter has suspended an account parodying Russia’s Putin.